1998-99 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA (No. 4)
UNIVERSITY SENATE MINUTES
FACULTY SENATE MINUTES
STUDENT SENATE MINUTES

UNIVERSITY SENATE MINUTES
APRIL 22, 1999

The fourth meeting of the University Senate for 1998-99 was convened in 25 Law Building, Minneapolis campus, on Thursday, April 22, 1999, at 2:54 p.m. Coordinate campuses were linked by telephone. Checking or signing the roll as present were 118 voting faculty/academic professional members, 24 voting student members, 1 ex officio member, and 9 nonmembers. President Mark Yudof presided.

__________________________________

CONSENT AGENDA
Action


Agenda Items I and II are considered to be noncontroversial or "housekeeping" in nature and are offered as a "Consent Agenda" to be taken up as a single item with one vote. Any item will be taken up separately at the request of a senator. A simple majority is required for approval.

I. MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 18

The Senate minutes are available on the Web at the following URL:

http://www1.umn.edu/usenate/u_senate/990218sen.html

II. SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
Amendments to Policies

MOTION:

The Senate authorizes the Senate Consultative Committee to make technical changes in all Senate policies and practices to accommodate the change to semesters, with the understanding that such changes will be clerical only, and that any changes of a substantive nature, or that are subsequently in need of clarification, will be brought to the Senate for action.

SARA EVANS, Chair
SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

DISCUSSION:

The Consent Agenda was approved with no discussion.

APPROVED

__________________________________
[End of Consent Agenda]

III. COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES
Bylaws Amendment
Action

MOTION:

To amend the University Senate Bylaws, Article III, Section 9 as follows; (additions are in CAPS).

9. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES COMMITTEE

The Information Technologies Committee represents faculty, academic professional, CIVIL SERVICE and student interests in the development, implementation, and distribution of information technologies at the University. Information technologies include information systems (including their associated hardware and software) and the electronic exchange of information among faculty, staff and students.

Membership

The Information Technologies Committee shall be composed of 10 faculty/academic professional members (with at least 7 of these members being regular teaching/research faculty), 1 CIVIL SERVICE STAFF MEMBER, and 3 student members (with at least one undergraduate and one graduate student). The membership shall be selected to represent the University broadly, including the colleges, coordinate campuses or research institutes. The Chief Information Officer, or his/her designate, shall serve in an ex-officio capacity. Other designated representatives of University departments or agencies with strong information technology interests are also encouraged to participate. These include equivalent committees at the college or campus level, the University Librarian, and the directors of distance education and administrative systems. Members shall be nominated by the Committee on Committees with the approval of the Senate. The terms of members shall be staggered so as to provide continuity in the activities of the committee.

COMMENT:

Per the request of the Civil Service Committee, Committee on Committees agreed that it would be appropriate for the Information Technologies Committee membership to include one civil service representative due to the nature of most civil service employees' positions. As a bylaw amendment, 101 affirmative votes are required for approval.

SALLY GREGORY KOHLSTEDT, Chair
COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES

DISCUSSION:

A vote was then taken and the change motion was approved with 125 votes in favor and none opposed.

APPROVED

IV. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
Changes to reflect Semester Conversion, Other Housekeeping Matters,
and Bylaws Amendment Requirements
Action

[This Item will be considered concurrently with the parallel
Item IV of the Twin Cities Campus Assembly docket.]

MOTION:

To approve the following amendments to the University Senate Constitution (additions are underlined, deletions are struck out).

A. Changes to reflect Semester Conversion and Other Housekeeping Matters

. . . .

ARTICLE III. UNIVERSITY SENATE

. . . .

4. Election of University Senate Members

a. . . . .

For the purpose of electing representatives to the Senate, the members of each faculty holding the rank of instructor (including research fellows) and above shall be eligible to vote, providing that they hold regular appointment as defined in the Faculty Tenure Code . Academic professionals eligible to serve in the Senate shall be eligible to vote.

b. . . . .

To be eligible for election to the University Senate, a student must have earned the required number of credits in residence at the University, as described below:

University College students shall be eligible for election if they have earned at least twelve eight credits in residence during the previous five years and are carrying at least three credits at the time of voting.

. . . .

e. Elections to the Senate shall be held no later than the 20th 30th day of May April. One third, or as near to one third as arithmetically possible, of the faculty/academic professional representatives of each institute, college, or school shall be elected each year by each institute, college, or school.

. . . .

5. Removal for Neglect of Meetings

a. A member of the University Senate shall be said to have neglected a meeting if the member does not attend and does not provide an alternate and does not notify the clerk, in writing, of the impending absence.

. . . .

6. University Senate and Student Senate Officers

a. The president of the University shall chair the University Senate. A vice chair shall be elected by the Senate at its first meeting in the spring last regularly scheduled meeting in the spring semester of the academic year from among its current members for a term of one year and shall be eligible for re-election. The president, with the consent of the Senate, shall appoint a clerk and a parliamentarian of the Senate (non-members of the Senate), whose duties shall be prescribed in the Senate Bylaws.

b. The officers of the Student Senate shall be a chair and a vice chair.

The chair and vice chair shall be elected at a special spring quarter semester session of the Student Senate attended only by student senators elected for the following year. . .

The duties of the vice chair are (1) to assume the duties of the chair in the event of an absence or incapacity of the chair; (2) to assume responsibilities delegated by the chair; (3) to submit to the Senate Office an annual budget request for the Student Senate and Student Consultative Committee, to be approved by the Student Senate during its fall quarter semester meeting; . . .

c. The president of the University shall chair the Faculty Senate. A vice chair shall be elected by the Faculty Senate in the spring at the last regularly scheduled meeting in the spring semester of the academic year for a term of one year and shall be eligible for re-election. . .

. . . .

8. University Senate Meetings--Call--Quorum

The University Senate shall hold regular meetings, at least once twice in each quarter semester of the academic year, at a time and place determined by the president. Special meetings of the University Senate and meetings of the Faculty or Student Senate may be held upon the call of the president or upon request of the appropriate Consultative Committee, or upon written request of ten members of the Senate in question.

At any regular or special meeting of any Senate, a majority of its membership shall constitute a quorum. Any member of the faculty and any student or academic professional eligible to vote for senators may be admitted to University Senate meetings and shall be entitled to speak at the discretion of the Senate. Only elected Senate members (or their designated alternates), Senate Consultative Committee members, and, in the case of a tie, the presiding officer, shall be entitled to vote. All members of the faculty who hold regular appointment as defined in the Faculty Tenure Code may be present at Faculty Senate meetings and shall be entitled to speak and to offer motions for Faculty Senate action. Only elected faculty members (or designated faculty alternates) shall be entitled to vote.

. . . .

B. Change to Bylaws Amendment Requirements

. . . .

ARTICLE VIII. AMENDING PROCEDURE

An amendment to this Constitution shall be approved either by a two-thirds majority of all voting members of the University Senate at a regular or special meeting, or by a majority of all voting members of the Senate at each of two meetings, the second of which shall be the next regular meeting; and provided the proposed amendment has been distributed, in writing, to the persons and in the manner provided in Article III, Section 7, for distribution of the Senate agenda, at least ten days prior to the date of the vote on the approval of the proposed amendment. An Amendment shall be effective following approval by the University Senate and by the Board of Regents.

ARTICLE IX. BYLAWS

The University Senate may enact or amend its Bylaws either by a majority vote of the total membership of all voting members of the University Senate at a regular or special meeting, or by a majority of all members of the Senate present and voting at each of two meetings, the second of which shall be the next regular meeting provided the proposed change has been submitted, in writing, to each member of the Senate at least ten days prior to the date of the vote on the approval of the proposed change.

. . . .

COMMENT ON PART A:

At the request of the chair and vice chair of the Faculty Consultative Committee, the Senate staff went through the Senate and Assembly constitution, bylaws, and rules and identified all the changes that would be needed in order to accommodate the change to semesters. In addition, the Business and Rules Committee identified a number of additional housekeeping amendments that would clean up processes and bring the language up to date. It is believed that all of these changes are non-controversial, and each set should be voted on as a package. As a constitutional amendment 134 affirmative votes are required at one meeting or 101 at each of two consecutive meetings. The motion received 119 affirmative votes at the February 18, 1999, meeting.

COMMENT ON PART B:

[The Senate Parliamentarian ruled, in March, 1999, that in ARTICLES VIII AND IX, "all voting members" shall mean Senate seats filled and does not include vacant seats.]

At present, it can be more difficult to amend the bylaws of the Senate than it is to amend the constitution, which is the opposite of what most deliberative bodies require. As the language now reads, constitutional amendments require EITHER a two-thirds vote at one meeting or a majority vote at two consecutive meetings, the vote totals based on the number of filled seats in the body. Bylaw amendments require a majority vote, with the vote total based on the total possible number of seats in the body, irrespective of whether or not they are filled. It is frequently difficult to achieve the majority vote needed simply because there are not enough of the members of the body present. (It appears, however, that the practice--contrary to what seems to be the meaning of the language--has been to count only filled seats when calculating the majorities required for bylaw amendments. Even with that practice, it has often been impossible to adopt bylaw amendments that the overwhelming majority of the body approves.)

This amendment changes the rules so that bylaws may also be amended by EITHER a majority vote (of seats filled) at one meeting or a majority vote (of those present and voting) at two meetings.

It is common practice in virtually all deliberative bodies to have bylaw changes made by a majority vote of those present and voting. The Senate requirements now in place run contrary to both widespread practice as well as the recommendation of Robert's Rules of Order; the result is that in order to accomplish its business, the Consultative Committees and other Senate committees must resort to extra-constitutional or perverse methods to achieve what everyone agrees is desirable.

In order to retain a safeguard to protect the interests of any who believe their interests might be ignored, however, the Consultative Committee recommends that for bylaw changes, a majority vote of all filled seats be required for one vote (as is now the requirement) or that a majority of those present and voting be required at two consecutive meetings. This would allow the Senate to accomplish what it needed to do, but provides that if there were less than absolute majorities of the full membership, it would take two meetings to approve the changes.

SARA EVANS, Chair
SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

DISCUSSION:

A vote was taken on Part A and there were 124 votes in favor and none opposed. Part A was approved. A vote was then taken on Part B and there were 125 votes in favor and none opposed. Part B was not approved and will be brought back to the Senate in May.

PART A WAS APPROVED
PART B WAS NOT APPROVED

V. SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
ACADEMIC HEALTH CENTER FACULTY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

Statement on Laboratory Vandalism
Information

FOR INFORMATION:

Faculty Consultative Committee
Academic Health Center Faculty Consultative Committee
Senate Committee on Research

The Faculty Consultative Committee (FCC) of the University Senate, the elected representatives of the University of Minnesota faculty from all campuses, makes the following statement about the recent vandalism committed in Lions Research Building and Elliott Hall on the Twin Cities campus of the University. The Faculty Consultative Committee of the Academic Health Center and the Senate Committee on Research join in this statement.

We are dismayed and alarmed at the recent acts of vandalism committed in University research facilities. These acts are a threat to academic freedom and to the integrity of the University. They reflect an anti-intellectualism and irrationality that is frightening. We are also saddened by the harm that such attacks have on research intended to advance human health.

We encourage the University administration and the civil authorities to take all necessary steps to identify and prosecute those who committed these acts of vandalism against University research facilities. We also extend our deep regrets and support to those faculty members, staff, and graduate students whose work has been affected, and ask that the administration provide resources to restore the records and facilities of those faculty members and graduate students.

Adopted unanimously April 7, 1999

SARA EVANS, Chair
SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

LEN KUHI, Chair
RESEARCH COMMITTEE

MURIEL BEBEAU, Chair
ACADEMIC HEALTH CENTER
FACULTY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

DISCUSSION:

Professor Sara Evans, chair of the Senate Consultative Committee (SCC), said that this statement was approved by several committees to express their dismay at the vandalism to various labs. The committees also expressed their support and regret to the faculty, staff and graduate students whose work was affected.

VI. EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Amendments to Uniform Grading and Transcript Policy
Information

FOR INFORMATION:

The Senate Committee on Educational Policy (SCEP) reports to the Senate that it makes the following editorial clarifications to the Uniform Grading and Transcript Policy (new language is underlined):

II. PERMANENT GRADES FOR ACADEMIC WORK

1. There are five permanent grades given for a single course for which credit shall be awarded. . . .

S Represents achievement that is satisfactory, which is equivalent to a C- or better.

. . . .

3. In connection with all symbols of achievement, and especially for the S, instructors shall define for a class, at one of its earliest meetings and as explicitly as possible, the performance that will be necessary to earn each (subject to the provision in this policy that the amount and quality of work required for an S may not be less than that required for a C-). [In any class, instructors have the right to set the level of performance required for an S at any level. They may not set it at less than a C-.]

. . . .

IV. OTHER PROVISIONS

. . . .

5. The course syllabus for every course which enrolls undergraduates shall include the definitions of grades set out in Section II (1) of this policy, as follows, and shall also include the workload expectations set forth in the Senate Policy Statement on Class Hour-Credit Ratio, as follows.

A - achievement that is outstanding relative to the level necessary to meet course requirements.
B - achievement that is significantly above the level necessary to meet course requirements.
C - achievement that meets the course requirements in every respect.
D - achievement that is worthy of credit even though it fails to meet fully the course requirements.
S - achievement that is satisfactory, which is equivalent to a C- or better (achievement required for an S is at the discretion of the instructor but may be no lower than equivalent to a C-).
----
F (or N) - Represents failure (or no credit) and signifies that the work was either (1) completed but at a level of achievement that is not worthy of credit or (2) was not completed and there was no agreement between the instructor and the student that the student would be awarded an I (see also I).

I - (Incomplete) Assigned at the discretion of the instructor when, due to extraordinary circumstances, e.g., hospitalization, a student is prevented from completing the work of the course on time. Requires a written agreement between instructor and student.

Academic Dishonesty

Academic dishonesty in any portion of the academic work for a course shall be grounds for awarding a grade of F or N for the entire course.

-----

One conventional credit is hereby defined as equivalent to three hours of learning effort per week, averaged over an appropriate time interval, necessary for an average student taking that course to achieve an average grade in that course.

COMMENT:

The Senate office and members of SCEP have received inquiries about setting the level of performance required for an S. The provisions of the existing Senate Uniform Grading and Transcript Policy are cited above, with a proposed editorial clarification. The language of the policy implies, but does not explicitly state, that instructors may set the performance required for an S at any level. The only requirement of the policy is that it not be less than equivalent to a C-.

Inasmuch as this is already implied in the policy, SCEP reports this clarification for information only, because Senate action is not required. The clarification is also reflected in the language recommended for use on course syllabi.

JUDITH MARTIN, Chair
EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE

VII. EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Semester Conversion Standards
Action

MOTION:

That the Senate adopt the following changes to the semester conversion standards, as follows (new language is underlined; language to be deleted is struck out):

STANDARDS FOR THE SEMESTER CONVERSION

[A note on use of terms: For the purposes of this document, references to "class hour" or "contact hour" or "hour" are defined as a 50-minute period.]

SECTION 1A: There shall be two semesters, each of which shall include a minimum of 70 days of instruction, and a maximum of 75 days of instruction, at least one study day, and approximately one week of final examinations (including Saturdays but not Sundays).

For the fall semester, classes shall begin after Labor Day and the exam period shall end not later than December 23.

For the spring semester, classes shall begin on the Tuesday following the third Monday of January and provide 74 or 75 class days of instruction.

Departments may schedule a short three-week intersession following the end of the spring semester and before the first summer term, using Summer Session compensation and tuition practices. No department shall be obligated to offer courses or academic work during this three-week term.

There shall be a standard eight-week summer session, which may not begin before K-12 public school classes are completed. No department shall be obligated to offer courses or academic work during this eight week session. Departments and programs may also work with Summer Session to deliver courses over either shorter or longer periods of time and with different starting and ending dates.

Colleges and campuses may authorize courses shorter than the term of enrollment, subject to the approval of appropriate curriculum review committees.

Final examinations normally shall be two (clock) hours long; instructors may schedule longer examinations with the approval of their department. Instructors and departments must decide in advance of scheduling a course if the examination is to exceed two hours. Any examinations which exceed two hours must be noted in the class schedule, in order that students are informed and can accommodate the longer examination in their schedule of final examinations.

Final grades shall be submitted to the Registrar no later than three business days following the date of the scheduled final examination (whether or not there is actually a final examination for the course). In the case of Fall Semester grades, the Registrar shall have the authority to extend the deadline if the due dates fall on or over the holidays.

The standard class period during fall and spring semester shall be 50 minutes. The standard cla period during the summer term(s) shall be in proportion to the length of the summer term vis-à-vis the two semesters.

SECTION 1B: Section 1A shall apply to all campuses of the University.

SECTION 1C: All campuses of the University shall have the same calendar.

COMMENT:

The Committee on Educational Policy, after reviewing numerous proposed calendars for future years, and after considering the academic calendars that have been adopted for next year, has concluded that the Standards for the Semester Conversion regarding uniformity of calendars are not, cannot, and probably should not be followed. We have listened to explanations of why particular colleges or campuses are unable to conform their calendars to a uniform University calendar. These explanations made sense to us. We do not believe there is any particular virtue in having a University-wide calendar that is exactly uniform on all campuses and colleges, so recommend to the Senate that the requirement be eliminated.

JUDITH MARTIN, Chair
EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE

DISCUSSION:

Professor Judith Martin, chair of the Educational Policy Committee (SCEP), said that when this policy was originally passed, SCEP had a wish for uniformity with the change to semesters. Unfortunately, whatever proposal is made for the Twin Cities does not work for the coordinate campuses. This motion then removes the uniform calendar piece from the Semester Conversion Standards. The floor was then opened for questions.

Q: Will the standard 50 minute class period be changed?

A: That is not included in the current motion.

With no further questions, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.

APPROVED

VIII. FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Principal Investigator Eligibility on Sponsored Projects Policy
Action

MOTION:

To approve the following policy:

Principal Investigator Eligibility on Sponsored Projects Policy

PREAMBLE

University of Minnesota faculty on regular appointments are expected to contribute to the University's research, teaching and outreach mission. The following policy has been developed to provide guidance to department and collegiate officials in reviewing research and/or training applications to be submitted for sponsored support. Units may develop additional or more restrictive standards regarding this matter; however, the minimum standards of this policy must be incorporated into department or collegiate policies and procedures.

POLICY

SECTION I: ELIGIBILITY FOR PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR STATUS

  1. Faculty who hold regular appointments are automatically eligible to serve as principal investigators.

  2. Term and non-regular faculty, and other academic employees (such as P & A employees) may serve as principal or co- investigators on research grants and contracts and other sponsored projects upon approval by the department head and/or the dean of the unit in which the individual is employed, according to policies established by the unit.

  3. Individuals holding "graduate student/professional training" academic appointments may serve as principal investigators on sponsored projects that the funding agency has specified as programs for which students are eligible. Applications in this category must receive the approval of the department head and/or the dean of the college or school in which the student is registered. The department head and/or the dean must inform the applicant that his or her position as principal investigator in no way affects his or her status as a student, nor does it commit the University to any future employment.

  4. In unusual circumstances, employees holding non-academic titles may serve as principal investigators, subject to approval by the department head and/or the dean of the unit in which the individual is employed.

  5. Some funding sources stipulate the criteria for principal investigators for their grants. Those criteria can be followed if they are compatible with the University's criteria.

  6. Principal investigator roles and responsibilities are listed in the "Roles and responsibilities " section of the Vice President for Research's web site at: http://www.research.umn.edu/research.html.

SECTION II: DETERMINATION OF PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR STATUS

  1. The responsibility for determining the status of an individual (other than regular faculty) as principal investigator rests with the department head or the dean who must exercise appropriate judgment regarding the individual's capability to provide the scientific/technical leadership and administrative management of the project. These must be the primary criteria for the determination of principal investigator status.

SECTION III: APPROVAL OF PROPOSALS

  1. Responsibility for the approval for all research and training project proposals rests with department heads, deans or comparable University officers, and ultimately the Sponsored Projects Administration (SPA). The SPA will not forward any application for sponsored support without the approval of the appropriate department head(s) and dean(s).

  2. At least three factors may enter the decision of department heads and deans when approving or disapproving the Proposal. The most important is that the proposer must have principal investigator status. Other factors include the space available to house the project and the availability of the resources necessary to conduct or complete the project.

  3. Principal investigators must have completed all required training before any award documents will be released by the SPA.

SECTION IV

  1. Grants and contracts for sponsored research and training projects are awarded to the University of Minnesota, rather than to individual investigators. Should the principal investigator, of whatever title, leave the University prior to completion of the project, the future of that project shall be governed by the terms of that contract/grant agreement, the wishes of the sponsor, or negotiations among the sponsor, the University, and the principal investigator, as is appropriate in the specific circumstances.

  2. The relationship of principal investigator to the University is governed by the appointment document. The approval of individuals as principal investigators or co-investigators in no way affects the rights, claims, and duties of such persons as may be specified in the tenure code or elsewhere. In particular, responsibilities as principal investigator or co-investigator do not imply any commitment on the part of the University of Minnesota to any subsequent appointment beyond the term of appointment then in effect.

  3. Appropriate affirmative action/equal opportunity policies and procedures apply to hiring non-regular or term academic and non-academic staff on sponsored research and training projects. Regardless of the availability or presumed availability of sponsored support, staff may not be hired independent of appropriate affirmative action policies and procedures.

  4. The status of principal investigator is granted by the department head or the dean before the approval of the proposal by the department head and/or dean and the SPA. However principal investigator status may be rescinded for just cause in accord with applicable University policies with the right of review through the Judicial Committee or the all-University grievance process as appropriate.

KENT BALES, Chair
FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

LEN KUHI, Chair
RESEARCH COMMITTEE

DISCUSSION:

Professor Kent Bales, chair of the Faculty Affairs Committee (SCFA), informed the senators that friendly amendments were made to the policy to include emerti professors in the list of faculty automatically eligible to be principal investigators and to make sure that space was available to conduct research.

Professor David Hamilton added that this updates a policy from 1980.

Q: In Section I, number 2 it states "...upon approval by the department head and/or dean of the unit..." Does this mean that the individual principal investigator is approved? Can someone be turned down?

A: Faculty as defined by the policy are automatically principal investigators. There are people who were not addressed in the previous policy who the University feels could now serve in this capacity. There are a number of criteria to be met, such as space and funding, which could allow the department head and/or dean to not approve a project.

Q: It seems to imply that contract employees could be approved, not approved, and/or removed by the action of the dean and/or department head.

A: The policy does not read this way and seems fair and equitable to all parties.

With no further questions, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.

APPROVED

IX. FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Education in the Responsible Conduct of Sponsored Research
and Grants Management Policy
Action

MOTION:

To approve the following policy:

Education in the Responsible Conduct of Sponsored Research
and Grants Management Policy

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

Faculty, staff and students serve in various roles on projects and activities in support of the research, scholarship and artistic mission of the University. The commitment to the highest standards of ethical behavior and fulfillment of the fiduciary duties of public funding are fundamental to the responsibility of serving as principal investigator or in another role on these projects. The University in turn has the responsibility to ensure that principal investigators, researchers, artists, scholars, and their staff and students have access to the necessary information and supporting resources to meet these expectations.

To help meet these shared responsibilities the Vice President for Research and Dean of the Graduate School has established a program to address the current and continuing educational needs of all personnel involved in externally and internally funded research, instructional and public service activities.

GUIDELINES

The following guidelines are adopted to direct the implementation of an educational program to address the needs of faculty, staff and students:

  1. The program will be under the direction of the Vice President for Research and Dean of the Graduate School.

  2. The Vice President and Dean will establish and sustain three advisory committees, one for each of the major constituencies having organizational and functional responsibility on projects:
    • academic personnel (including faculty, department heads, directors, Deans and other academic administrators),
    • administrative staff (including all personnel who perform administrative tasks),
    • technical and research staff and students serving on projects (including graduate, undergraduate, and post-doctorate students).

  3. Each advisory committee will
    • identify the educational needs of its constituency,
    • develop a comprehensive curriculum,
    • oversee the content of the programming,
    • recommend delivery formats,
    • propose appropriate recognition or accreditation,
    • establish continuing education requirements as appropriate.

  4. In conjunction with the Vice President and Dean, the Center for Human Resource Development will maintain information on participation in educational activities and develop mechanisms to assess the effectiveness of the educational program.

  5. The University has the responsibility to publicize the educational requirements of this policy to all employees, to commit the resources necessary to establish and sustain the ongoing educational program, and to see that it is actually carried out.

KENT BALES, Chair
FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

LEN KUHI, Chair
RESEARCH COMMITTEE

DISCUSSION:

Professor Kent Bales, chair of the Faculty Affairs Committee (SCFA), said that this policy initiates "...the implementation of an educational program to address the needs of faculty, staff, and students..." in the responsible conduct of sponsored research and grants management. The floor was then opened for questions.

With no questions, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.

APPROVED

X. PRESIDENT'S REPORT

President Yudof began by thanking the Faculty Consultative Committee (FCC) and the Student Senate for their resolutions on the allegations of academic misconduct in the Men's Basketball program. These resolutions are helpful and show that the University is united in its determination to see that this matter is quickly, thoroughly, and fairly investigated. Two independent law firms are investigating the allegations. Faculty and students will need to take a careful look at the policies in this area once the investigations are completed, since the academic integrity of the University must be valued above any game.

He then thanked the FCC for their resolution on the vandalism that destroyed many University labs. 12 labs were vandalized at Elliott Hall and Lions Lab with the estimated damage at $1 - 2 million. Over 100 animals were stolen and then subsequently released. Efforts are beingm ade to recover data from the equipment that was damaged. Security will also be examined. The FBI, University Police, and the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension of Hennepin County are all involved in the investigation. Both buildings are operating, but on a reduced scale and without many of the animals. Senior Vice President Frank Cerra and I authorized expenditures to replace equipment and other losses before the insurance funds were available.

In its biennial request, the University requested $198 million from the Legislature to support initiatives in 5 areas. The Governor was supportive of this proposal and recommended $122 million along with a $36 million endowment to be managed by the University Medical Foundation in support of health profession education. The House appropriated $121.7 million with no provision for an endowment for the Academic Health Center (AHC). Their bill did include a place saver for this item, so it is still part of the conference bill and can be included in the conference debates. The Senate bill appears to provide only $82 million.

There are many competing demands for funding, including the expectation of citizens that a significant share of the current surplus, as well as the tobacco settlement funds, will be returned to the citizens of Minnesota. However, in the view of many people in the state, given the large size of the budget surplus, the Legislature also has an historic opportunity to make investments that will stimulate the state's economy and have lasting benefits for the citizens and the University. Included in this is the ability to offer competitive compensation for faculty, a first class undergraduate education, and save the future of the AHC. The AHC is currently running a deficit of $4 - 5 million per year. Similar problems are also being seen at other institutions around the country. People throughout the state seem to be in support of continued funding, as well as using some of the tobacco settlement to create an endowment. He then asked everyone to write letters or talk to their representative. He concluded by thanking Professor Marvin Marshak, Cheryl Jorgensen, and Institutional Relations for their efforts.

XI. QUESTIONS TO THE PRESIDENT

NONE


XII. SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT

Professor Sara Evans, chair of the Senate Consultative Committee (SCC), said that many projects this year have been under the themes of shared governance and the intellectual future of the University. Lately, the University has been concerned with its intellectual present. Resolutions have been passed about academic integrity in response to the basketball allegations and academic freedom in response to the vandalism of labs. The University's intellectual future is bound to the University's fate in the Legislature. She asked that everyone write and talk with legislators in support of the University.

She then reminded the faculty that Academic Appointments and Intellectual Property were going to be discussed later this afternoon and faculty discussion was greatly needed.

The Faculty Consultative Committee (FCC), in association with the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), has sponsored a series of three evenings with professors who were hired within the last three years. The hope of these dinners is to draw the new faculty into the community as a whole, to help them avoid being isolated in their departments. The FCC and the AHC administrators are also in the middle of another series of workshops on the topic of shared governance.

Today, SCC leadership was elected for the following year. Professor Fred Morrison will serve as the chair and Professor David Hamilton will serve as the vice chair. These two individuals will be able to work with the administration on the issues confronting the University today, the budget and grants management.

President Yudof thanked Professor Evans for all of her work. He has attended the workshops with the AHC and finds them special in that groups of faculty are volunteering to help other groups of faculty at the University.

XIII. TRIBUTE TO DECEASED MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY

FACULTY

William F. Bear
Professor
Agricultural Engineering
1927-1999

Caroline A. Brede
Associate Professor
Law School
1912-1999

Caroline A. Brede, a 64-year employee of the Law School and one of the University's longest-serving employees, died Thursday, April 1, 1999

Miss Brede graduated cum laude from the University of Minnesota in 1933 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Library Science. She was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and a charter member of the Sigma Epsilon Sigma Women's Honor Society. Upon graduation, she was hired as a cataloger at the University Library. Two years later, Arthur C. Pulling recruited her to fill a similar position at the Law Library. In 1945, she was appointed Assistant Director of the Law Library and served in that capacity until 1982. She served as Acting Director of the Library in 1960 upon the departure of Library Director Leon Liddell and again in 1978 with the departure of George Grossman. Since her retirement from the Library in 1982, Ms. Brede served as Special Assistant to the Dean of the Law School.

Throughout her career, she was dedicated to her work at the Law School and to the importance of education. She was very active in the American Association of Law Libraries at both the national and regional level. She served as President of the Minnesota Association of Law Libraries in 1958. She also was an active member of the University Women's Club and was a volunteer at Fairview University Medical Center.

William C. Gemeinhardt
Associate Dean
College of Education and Student Affairs-UMD
1927-1999

Dr. William C. Gemeinhardt, retired Associate Dean of the College of Education and Human Service Professions at the University of Minnesota Duluth, died on Wednesday, February 24, 1999, in his home.

He was born in Milwaukee. He received his master's degree and a doctorate degree in philosophy from the University of Minnesota. He headed the Department of Education at Northern State Teachers College in Aberdeen, South Dakota, where he taught from 1955 to 1965. He taught at Winona State Teachers College in 1965 and 1966. He began teaching at the University of Minnesota Duluth in 1966, and taught in the Department of Elementary Education and the Department of Child and Family Development. He became Associate Dean of the College of Education and Human Service Professions in 1986 and held that position until his retirement in 1992.

He served in Guam during World War II in the U.S. Navy. He was a member of Pilgrim Congregational Church, and of Phi Delta Kappa, serving as its area coordinator for several years. He had also been active in the PTA at Cobb School in Duluth, Minnesota. His parents were William E. and Caroline Gemeinhardt.

He is survived by his wife, Dorothy, a daughter Patricia (Lonne) Isaacson of Maplewood, Minnesota, and grandchildren John and Jason. Services were held in Duluth.

Archie L. Good
Professor
Veterinary Biology
1921-1999

Archie Leroy Good was born on January 8, 1921, the son of Harry Harrison and Susan (Weiser) Good at Marysville, Pennsylvania. He was the second to last child of 11 children. At the death of both parents when Archie was 7 years old, he was placed in the Milton Hershey School, for orphan children at Hershey, PA, where he stayed through Junior College. Even at a young age his trustworthiness and reliability singled him out for special privileges and responsibilities. During Junior College, convinced of his outstanding aptitude and ability, they supported him in his bid for a gubernatorial grant which was awarded allowing him to attend the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine on a full scholarship. In 1975 he was honored as their distinguished alumnus of the year.

Archie graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1943 as a Veterinary Medical Doctor (VMD). That same year he married Ruth (Hess) Good and after only seven months together he was shipped to the South Pacific during World War II to serve in the U.S. Army Veterinary Corps for three years. After Archie's discharge in 1946 as a Major, he immediately began and completed his Master of Science degree at Kansas State University and taught there for five years. They then moved to Minnesota where he taught Physiology in the Veterinary College at the University of Minnesota from 1951 - 1987. During his early teaching years he also earned his Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota.

As an academic, Archie had a wide range of interests chief among them temperature regulation and blood clotting. He has to withstand kidding for the USAF sponsored research early in his a career on the effect of low environmental temperature on body heat regulation. He would sit in a walk-in freezer at 40 below zero when Minnesota outdoor temperatures were 20 below doing his research. Only a devoted physiologist would indulge his curiosity in such extremes. Archie returned to his research interests in body temperature regulation late in his career cooperating with others researching the outdoor calf hutch rearing practice. He was interested in hypothermia and fever and never felt that the two conditions were adequately differentiated. He authored many significant articles which have appeared in professional journals and other noted publications. Mentally, he was always doing research.

Archie cared a great deal about his role as a teacher and researcher in Veterinary Physiology. He did not seek recognition. He was an effective teacher and an example to students, undergraduate, professional and graduate students at all levels of accomplishment. He knew that, in addition to knowledge of veterinary science and manipulative skills, concern for others, integrity, reliability and fairness were very important characteristics for those who entered the Veterinary Medical profession. Those that worked with him knew that Archie had those qualities.

From the veterinary student's perspective, he was a teacher who was tough and demanding, supportive and a good mentor. From a colleague's perspective, he was a man known for his keen sense of humor and ready story to share. He could be distinguished by his crew cut, bow tie, honesty, ability to keep a confidence, no indulgence in gossip or character assassination, generosity, spiritually rooted, always gentle and constructive language, devoted husband and father, and challenging teacher. All that knew him have been privileged to have been in his company.

Archie continued to seek out ways to continue to be a responsible, productive citizen and so continued to serve the community after his retirement from the University by volunteering at the Hubbs Learning Center where he taught reading and math. Archie also volunteered many hours of service to his church, doing whatever was in his capacity to do. In his love for animals, he was an avid bird watcher and imparted his love of birds to his children and grandchildren.

His marriage of 55 years produced four children: Thomas (Nancy), Susan (Charles) West, Stephen (Deborah), and Barbara (Daniel) Roloff; and seven grandchildren: Julie and Taryn Good, David West, Scott and Kimberly Good, and Thomas and Cara Roloff.

Archie was a man who made family a priority and showed his devotion by giving us his time, love, care and generosity. Though we are proud of Archie's academic record and accomplishments and his willingness to serve the community, we will remember him for his wonderful, endearing personal qualities that caused us to know and be secure in his love for us.

Paul R. Hasbargen
Professor
Agriculture Economics
1929-1999

Carole Y. Keels
Professor
Social Sciences-UMM
1944-1999

Iftikhar A. Khan
Associate Professor
English
1924-1999

Burtrum C. Schiele
Professor
Psychiatry
1904-1999

Clark D. Starr
Professor
Communication Disorders
1927-1999

Eric N. Stokes
Professor
Music
1930-1999

George T. Tani
Professor
Ophthalmology
1915-1999

Dr. George T. Tani, ophthalmologist and retired clinical professor at the University of Minnesota School of Medicine, died of pulmonary cardiac arrest on March 22, 1999 at the age of 83.

Tani was born on December 16, 1915 in Oakland, California. He graduated from the University of California School of Optometry in 1939. During World War II, he was interned at a relocation camp in Idaho for Japanese-Americans where he served as the camp tometrist. He was released in 1943 to serve as an autopsy assistant in Chicago. In 1944, he joined the Army's U.S. Military Intelligence Language School at Fort Snelling. Tani married his wife, Yoshi, in 1945 at the Fort Snelling Chapel.

Tani was accepted by the University of Minnesota Medical School in 1947, and graduated in 1950. His Ophthalmology Residency was at the Mayo Clinic. He established his own clinic, Tani Eye Associates, where he was later joined by his sons, Doug and Paul, practice. He dedicated more than 30 years of his life to teaching at the University of Minnesota and Regions Hospital in St. Paul. In addition, he worked hard to secure philanthropic support for the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Minnesota. To recognize 30 years of volunteers service to the University's ophthalmology department and the Lion's Eye Bank, Tani was awarded the first Outstanding Alumni Service Award from the Vision Foundation in 1991. In 1993, he received the Asian-Pacific Leadership Award from the State of Minnesota Council on Asian-Pacific Minnesotans for providing community and health services. Tani was former president of the Mayo Clinic Ophthalmology Alumni Association, the University of Minnesota Medical Alumni Association, the Japan American Society of Minnesota and the North Maplewood Lions Club.

At his memorial service, colleagues remembered Tani as a generous, caring man dedicated to his students, his clients and his country. He is survived by his wife, Yoshi; a daughter, Kay; two sons, Paul and Doug; a brother, three sisters, seven granddaughters and a great-grandson.

STUDENTS

Kristopher Jung Jae Clyne
College of Liberal Arts

XIV. OLD BUSINESS

NONE


XV. NEW BUSINESS

NONE


XVI. ADJOURNMENT

The meeting was adjourned at 3:44 p.m.

Rebecca Hippert
Abstractor