VI. EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Amendments to Uniform Grading and Transcript Policy
Information
FOR INFORMATION:
The Senate Committee on Educational Policy (SCEP) reports to the Senate that it
makes the following editorial clarifications to the Uniform Grading and
Transcript Policy (new language is underlined):
II. PERMANENT GRADES FOR ACADEMIC WORK
1. There are five permanent grades given for a single course for which credit
shall be awarded. . . .
S Represents achievement that is satisfactory, which is equivalent to a C- or
better.
. . . .
3. In connection with all symbols of achievement, and especially for the S,
instructors shall define for a class, at one of its earliest meetings and as
explicitly as possible, the performance that will be necessary to earn each
(subject to the provision in this policy that the amount and quality of work
required for an S may not be less than that required for a C-). [In any
class, instructors have the right to set the level of performance required for
an S at any level. They may not set it at less than a C-.]
. . . .
IV. OTHER PROVISIONS
. . . .
5. The course syllabus for every course which enrolls undergraduates shall
include the definitions of grades set out in Section II (1) of this policy, as
follows, and shall also include the workload expectations set forth in the
Senate Policy Statement on Class Hour-Credit Ratio, as follows.
A - achievement that is outstanding relative to the level necessary to meet
course requirements.
B - achievement that is significantly above the level necessary to meet course
requirements.
C - achievement that meets the course requirements in every respect.
D - achievement that is worthy of credit even though it fails to meet fully the
course requirements.
S - achievement that is satisfactory, which is equivalent to a C- or better
(achievement required for an S is at the discretion of the instructor but
may be no lower than equivalent to a C-).
----
F (or N) - Represents failure (or no credit) and signifies that the work was
either (1) completed but at a level of achievement that is not worthy of credit
or (2) was not completed and there was no agreement between the instructor and
the student that the student would be awarded an I (see also I).
I - (Incomplete) Assigned at the discretion of the instructor when, due to
extraordinary circumstances, e.g., hospitalization, a student is prevented
from completing the work of the course on time. Requires a written agreement
between instructor and student.
Academic Dishonesty
Academic dishonesty in any portion of the academic work for a course shall be
grounds for awarding a grade of F or N for the entire course.
-----
One conventional credit is hereby defined as equivalent to three hours of
learning effort per week, averaged over an appropriate time interval, necessary
for an average student taking that course to achieve an average grade in that
course.
COMMENT:
The Senate office and members of SCEP have received inquiries about setting
the level of performance required for an S. The provisions of the existing
Senate Uniform Grading and Transcript Policy are cited above, with a proposed
editorial clarification. The language of the policy implies, but does not
explicitly state, that instructors may set the performance required for an S at
any level. The only requirement of the policy is that it not be less than
equivalent to a C-.
Inasmuch as this is already implied in the policy, SCEP reports this
clarification for information only, because Senate action is not required. The
clarification is also reflected in the language recommended for use on course
syllabi.
JUDITH MARTIN, Chair
EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE
VII. EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Semester Conversion Standards
Action
MOTION:
That the Senate adopt the following changes to the semester conversion
standards, as follows (new language is underlined; language to be
deleted is struck out):
STANDARDS FOR THE SEMESTER CONVERSION
[A note on use of terms: For the purposes of this document, references to
"class hour" or "contact hour" or "hour" are defined as a 50-minute period.]
SECTION 1A: There shall be two semesters, each of which shall include a minimum
of 70 days of instruction, and a maximum of 75 days of
instruction, at least one study day, and approximately one
week of final examinations (including Saturdays but not Sundays).
For the fall semester, classes shall begin after Labor Day and
the exam period shall end not later than December 23.
For the spring semester, classes shall begin on the Tuesday following
the third Monday of January and provide 74 or 75 class days of
instruction.
Departments may schedule a short three-week intersession following the end of
the spring semester and before the first summer term, using Summer Session
compensation and tuition practices. No department shall be obligated to offer
courses or academic work during this three-week term.
There shall be a standard eight-week summer session, which may not begin before
K-12 public school classes are completed. No department shall be obligated to
offer courses or academic work during this eight week session. Departments and
programs may also work with Summer Session to deliver courses over either
shorter or longer periods of time and with different starting and ending
dates.
Colleges and campuses may authorize courses shorter than the term of
enrollment, subject to the approval of appropriate curriculum review
committees.
Final examinations normally shall be two (clock) hours long; instructors may
schedule longer examinations with the approval of their department. Instructors
and departments must decide in advance of scheduling a course if the
examination is to exceed two hours. Any examinations which exceed two hours
must be noted in the class schedule, in order that students are informed and
can accommodate the longer examination in their schedule of final
examinations.
Final grades shall be submitted to the Registrar no later than three business
days following the date of the scheduled final examination (whether or not
there is actually a final examination for the course). In the case of Fall
Semester grades, the Registrar shall have the authority to extend the deadline
if the due dates fall on or over the holidays.
The standard class period during fall and spring semester shall be 50 minutes.
The standard cla period during the summer term(s) shall be in proportion to the
length of the summer term vis-à-vis the two semesters.
SECTION 1B: Section 1A shall apply to all campuses of the University.
SECTION 1C: All campuses of the University shall have the same
calendar.
COMMENT:
The Committee on Educational Policy, after reviewing numerous proposed
calendars for future years, and after considering the academic calendars that
have been adopted for next year, has concluded that the Standards for the
Semester Conversion regarding uniformity of calendars are not, cannot, and
probably should not be followed. We have listened to explanations of why
particular colleges or campuses are unable to conform their calendars to a
uniform University calendar. These explanations made sense to us. We do not
believe there is any particular virtue in having a University-wide calendar
that is exactly uniform on all campuses and colleges, so recommend to the
Senate that the requirement be eliminated.
JUDITH MARTIN, Chair
EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE
DISCUSSION:
Professor Judith Martin, chair of the Educational Policy Committee (SCEP), said
that when this policy was originally passed, SCEP had a wish for uniformity
with the change to semesters. Unfortunately, whatever proposal is made for the
Twin Cities does not work for the coordinate campuses. This motion then
removes the uniform calendar piece from the Semester Conversion Standards. The
floor was then opened for questions.
Q: Will the standard 50 minute class period be changed?
A: That is not included in the current motion.
With no further questions, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.
APPROVED
VIII. FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Principal Investigator Eligibility on Sponsored Projects Policy
Action
MOTION:
To approve the following policy:
Principal Investigator Eligibility on Sponsored Projects
Policy
PREAMBLE
University of Minnesota faculty on regular appointments are expected to
contribute to the University's research, teaching and outreach mission. The
following policy has been developed to provide guidance to department and
collegiate officials in reviewing research and/or training applications to be
submitted for sponsored support. Units may develop additional or more
restrictive standards regarding this matter; however, the minimum standards of
this policy must be incorporated into department or collegiate policies and
procedures.
POLICY
SECTION I: ELIGIBILITY FOR PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR STATUS
- Faculty who hold regular appointments are automatically eligible to serve as
principal investigators.
- Term and non-regular faculty, and other academic employees (such as P &
A employees) may serve as principal or co- investigators on research grants and
contracts and other sponsored projects upon approval by the department head
and/or the dean of the unit in which the individual is employed, according to
policies established by the unit.
- Individuals holding "graduate student/professional training" academic
appointments may serve as principal investigators on sponsored projects that
the funding agency has specified as programs for which students are eligible.
Applications in this category must receive the approval of the department head
and/or the dean of the college or school in which the student is registered.
The department head and/or the dean must inform the applicant that his or her
position as principal investigator in no way affects his or her status as a
student, nor does it commit the University to any future employment.
- In unusual circumstances, employees holding non-academic titles may serve as
principal investigators, subject to approval by the department head and/or the
dean of the unit in which the individual is employed.
- Some funding sources stipulate the criteria for principal investigators for
their grants. Those criteria can be followed if they are compatible with the
University's criteria.
- Principal investigator roles and responsibilities are listed in the "Roles
and responsibilities " section of the Vice President for Research's web site
at: http://www.research.umn.edu/research.html.
SECTION II: DETERMINATION OF PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR STATUS
- The responsibility for determining the status of an individual (other than
regular faculty) as principal investigator rests with the department head or
the dean who must exercise appropriate judgment regarding the individual's
capability to provide the scientific/technical leadership and administrative
management of the project. These must be the primary criteria for the
determination of principal investigator status.
SECTION III: APPROVAL OF PROPOSALS
- Responsibility for the approval for all research and training project
proposals rests with department heads, deans or comparable University officers,
and ultimately the Sponsored Projects Administration (SPA). The SPA will not
forward any application for sponsored support without the approval of the
appropriate department head(s) and dean(s).
- At least three factors may enter the decision of department heads and deans
when approving or disapproving the Proposal. The most important is that the
proposer must have principal investigator status. Other factors include the
space available to house the project and the availability of the resources
necessary to conduct or complete the project.
- Principal investigators must have completed all required training before any
award documents will be released by the SPA.
SECTION IV
- Grants and contracts for sponsored research and training projects are
awarded to the University of Minnesota, rather than to individual
investigators. Should the principal investigator, of whatever title, leave the
University prior to completion of the project, the future of that project shall
be governed by the terms of that contract/grant agreement, the wishes of the
sponsor, or negotiations among the sponsor, the University, and the principal
investigator, as is appropriate in the specific circumstances.
- The relationship of principal investigator to the University is governed by
the appointment document. The approval of individuals as principal
investigators or co-investigators in no way affects the rights, claims, and
duties of such persons as may be specified in the tenure code or elsewhere. In
particular, responsibilities as principal investigator or co-investigator do
not imply any commitment on the part of the University of Minnesota to any
subsequent appointment beyond the term of appointment then in effect.
- Appropriate affirmative action/equal opportunity policies and procedures
apply to hiring non-regular or term academic and non-academic staff on
sponsored research and training projects. Regardless of the availability or
presumed availability of sponsored support, staff may not be hired independent
of appropriate affirmative action policies and procedures.
- The status of principal investigator is granted by the department head or
the dean before the approval of the proposal by the department head and/or dean
and the SPA. However principal investigator status may be rescinded for just
cause in accord with applicable University policies with the right of review
through the Judicial Committee or the all-University grievance process as
appropriate.
KENT BALES, Chair
FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
LEN KUHI, Chair
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
DISCUSSION:
Professor Kent Bales, chair of the Faculty Affairs Committee (SCFA), informed
the senators that friendly amendments were made to the policy to include emerti
professors in the list of faculty automatically eligible to be principal
investigators and to make sure that space was available to conduct research.
Professor David Hamilton added that this updates a policy from 1980.
Q: In Section I, number 2 it states "...upon approval by the department
head and/or dean of the unit..." Does this mean that the individual principal
investigator is approved? Can someone be turned down?
A: Faculty as defined by the policy are automatically principal
investigators. There are people who were not addressed in the previous policy
who the University feels could now serve in this capacity. There are a number
of criteria to be met, such as space and funding, which could allow the
department head and/or dean to not approve a project.
Q: It seems to imply that contract employees could be approved, not
approved, and/or removed by the action of the dean and/or department head.
A: The policy does not read this way and seems fair and equitable to all
parties.
With no further questions, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.
APPROVED
IX. FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Education in the Responsible Conduct of Sponsored Research
and Grants Management Policy
Action
MOTION:
To approve the following policy:
Education in the Responsible Conduct of Sponsored
Research
and Grants Management Policy
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Faculty, staff and students serve in various roles on projects and activities
in support of the research, scholarship and artistic mission of the University.
The commitment to the highest standards of ethical behavior and fulfillment of
the fiduciary duties of public funding are fundamental to the responsibility of
serving as principal investigator or in another role on these projects. The
University in turn has the responsibility to ensure that principal
investigators, researchers, artists, scholars, and their staff and students
have access to the necessary information and supporting resources to meet these
expectations.
To help meet these shared responsibilities the Vice President for Research and
Dean of the Graduate School has established a program to address the current
and continuing educational needs of all personnel involved in externally and
internally funded research, instructional and public service activities.
GUIDELINES
The following guidelines are adopted to direct the implementation of an
educational program to address the needs of faculty, staff and students:
- The program will be under the direction of the Vice President for Research
and Dean of the Graduate School.
- The Vice President and Dean will establish and sustain three advisory
committees, one for each of the major constituencies having organizational and
functional responsibility on projects:
- academic personnel (including faculty, department heads, directors,
Deans and other academic administrators),
- administrative staff (including all personnel who perform
administrative tasks),
- technical and research staff and students serving on projects
(including graduate, undergraduate, and post-doctorate students).
- Each advisory committee will
- identify the educational needs of its constituency,
- develop a comprehensive curriculum,
- oversee the content of the programming,
- recommend delivery formats,
- propose appropriate recognition or accreditation,
- establish continuing education requirements as appropriate.
- In conjunction with the Vice President and Dean, the Center for Human
Resource Development will maintain information on participation in educational
activities and develop mechanisms to assess the effectiveness of the
educational program.
- The University has the responsibility to publicize the educational
requirements of this policy to all employees, to commit the resources necessary
to establish and sustain the ongoing educational program, and to see that it is
actually carried out.
KENT BALES, Chair
FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
LEN KUHI, Chair
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
DISCUSSION:
Professor Kent Bales, chair of the Faculty Affairs Committee (SCFA), said that
this policy initiates "...the implementation of an educational program to
address the needs of faculty, staff, and students..." in the responsible
conduct of sponsored research and grants management. The floor was then opened
for questions.
With no questions, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.
APPROVED
X. PRESIDENT'S REPORT
President Yudof began by thanking the Faculty Consultative Committee (FCC) and
the Student Senate for their resolutions on the allegations of academic
misconduct in the Men's Basketball program. These resolutions are helpful and
show that the University is united in its determination to see that this matter
is quickly, thoroughly, and fairly investigated. Two independent law firms are
investigating the allegations. Faculty and students will need to take a
careful look at the policies in this area once the investigations are
completed, since the academic integrity of the University must be valued above
any game.
He then thanked the FCC for their resolution on the vandalism that destroyed
many University labs. 12 labs were vandalized at Elliott Hall and Lions Lab
with the estimated damage at $1 - 2 million. Over 100 animals were stolen and
then subsequently released. Efforts are beingm ade to recover data from the
equipment that was damaged. Security will also be examined. The FBI,
University Police, and the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension of Hennepin County
are all involved in the investigation. Both buildings are operating, but on a
reduced scale and without many of the animals. Senior Vice President Frank
Cerra and I authorized expenditures to replace equipment and other losses
before the insurance funds were available.
In its biennial request, the University requested $198 million from the
Legislature to support initiatives in 5 areas. The Governor was supportive of
this proposal and recommended $122 million along with a $36 million endowment
to be managed by the University Medical Foundation in support of health
profession education. The House appropriated $121.7 million with no provision
for an endowment for the Academic Health Center (AHC). Their bill did include
a place saver for this item, so it is still part of the conference bill and can
be included in the conference debates. The Senate bill appears to provide only
$82 million.
There are many competing demands for funding, including the expectation of
citizens that a significant share of the current surplus, as well as the
tobacco settlement funds, will be returned to the citizens of Minnesota.
However, in the view of many people in the state, given the large size of the
budget surplus, the Legislature also has an historic opportunity to make
investments that will stimulate the state's economy and have lasting benefits
for the citizens and the University. Included in this is the ability to offer
competitive compensation for faculty, a first class undergraduate education,
and save the future of the AHC. The AHC is currently running a deficit of $4 -
5 million per year. Similar problems are also being seen at other institutions
around the country. People throughout the state seem to be in support of
continued funding, as well as using some of the tobacco settlement to create an
endowment. He then asked everyone to write letters or talk to their
representative. He concluded by thanking Professor Marvin Marshak, Cheryl
Jorgensen, and Institutional Relations for their efforts.
XI. QUESTIONS TO THE PRESIDENT
NONE
XII. SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT
Professor Sara Evans, chair of the Senate Consultative Committee (SCC), said
that many projects this year have been under the themes of shared governance
and the intellectual future of the University. Lately, the University has been
concerned with its intellectual present. Resolutions have been passed about
academic integrity in response to the basketball allegations and academic
freedom in response to the vandalism of labs. The University's intellectual
future is bound to the University's fate in the Legislature. She asked that
everyone write and talk with legislators in support of the University.
She then reminded the faculty that Academic Appointments and Intellectual
Property were going to be discussed later this afternoon and faculty discussion
was greatly needed.
The Faculty Consultative Committee (FCC), in association with the American
Association of University Professors (AAUP), has sponsored a series of three
evenings with professors who were hired within the last three years. The hope
of these dinners is to draw the new faculty into the community as a whole, to
help them avoid being isolated in their departments. The FCC and the AHC
administrators are also in the middle of another series of workshops on the
topic of shared governance.
Today, SCC leadership was elected for the following year. Professor Fred
Morrison will serve as the chair and Professor David Hamilton will serve as the
vice chair. These two individuals will be able to work with the administration
on the issues confronting the University today, the budget and grants
management.
President Yudof thanked Professor Evans for all of her work. He has attended
the workshops with the AHC and finds them special in that groups of faculty are
volunteering to help other groups of faculty at the University.
XIII. TRIBUTE TO DECEASED MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY
FACULTY
William F. Bear
Professor
Agricultural Engineering
1927-1999
Caroline A. Brede
Associate Professor
Law School
1912-1999
Caroline A. Brede, a 64-year employee of the Law School and one of the
University's longest-serving employees, died Thursday, April 1, 1999
Miss Brede graduated cum laude from the University of Minnesota in 1933 with a
Bachelor of Science degree in Library Science. She was a member of Phi Beta
Kappa and a charter member of the Sigma Epsilon Sigma Women's Honor Society.
Upon graduation, she was hired as a cataloger at the University Library. Two
years later, Arthur C. Pulling recruited her to fill a similar position at the
Law Library. In 1945, she was appointed Assistant Director of the Law Library
and served in that capacity until 1982. She served as Acting Director of the
Library in 1960 upon the departure of Library Director Leon Liddell and again
in 1978 with the departure of George Grossman. Since her retirement from the
Library in 1982, Ms. Brede served as Special Assistant to the Dean of the Law
School.
Throughout her career, she was dedicated to her work at the Law School and to
the importance of education. She was very active in the American Association
of Law Libraries at both the national and regional level. She served as
President of the Minnesota Association of Law Libraries in 1958. She also was
an active member of the University Women's Club and was a volunteer at Fairview
University Medical Center.
William C. Gemeinhardt
Associate Dean
College of Education and Student Affairs-UMD
1927-1999
Dr. William C. Gemeinhardt, retired Associate Dean of the College of Education
and Human Service Professions at the University of Minnesota Duluth, died on
Wednesday, February 24, 1999, in his home.
He was born in Milwaukee. He received his master's degree and a doctorate
degree in philosophy from the University of Minnesota. He headed the
Department of Education at Northern State Teachers College in Aberdeen, South
Dakota, where he taught from 1955 to 1965. He taught at Winona State Teachers
College in 1965 and 1966. He began teaching at the University of Minnesota
Duluth in 1966, and taught in the Department of Elementary Education and the
Department of Child and Family Development. He became Associate Dean of the
College of Education and Human Service Professions in 1986 and held that
position until his retirement in 1992.
He served in Guam during World War II in the U.S. Navy. He was a member of
Pilgrim Congregational Church, and of Phi Delta Kappa, serving as its area
coordinator for several years. He had also been active in the PTA at Cobb
School in Duluth, Minnesota. His parents were William E. and Caroline
Gemeinhardt.
He is survived by his wife, Dorothy, a daughter Patricia (Lonne) Isaacson of
Maplewood, Minnesota, and grandchildren John and Jason. Services were held in
Duluth.
Archie L. Good
Professor
Veterinary Biology
1921-1999
Archie Leroy Good was born on January 8, 1921, the son of Harry Harrison and
Susan (Weiser) Good at Marysville, Pennsylvania. He was the second to last
child of 11 children. At the death of both parents when Archie was 7 years
old, he was placed in the Milton Hershey School, for orphan children at
Hershey, PA, where he stayed through Junior College. Even at a young age his
trustworthiness and reliability singled him out for special privileges and
responsibilities. During Junior College, convinced of his outstanding aptitude
and ability, they supported him in his bid for a gubernatorial grant which was
awarded allowing him to attend the University of Pennsylvania School of
Veterinary Medicine on a full scholarship. In 1975 he was honored as their
distinguished alumnus of the year.
Archie graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1943 as a Veterinary
Medical Doctor (VMD). That same year he married Ruth (Hess) Good and after
only seven months together he was shipped to the South Pacific during World War
II to serve in the U.S. Army Veterinary Corps for three years. After Archie's
discharge in 1946 as a Major, he immediately began and completed his Master of
Science degree at Kansas State University and taught there for five years.
They then moved to Minnesota where he taught Physiology in the Veterinary
College at the University of Minnesota from 1951 - 1987. During his early
teaching years he also earned his Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota.
As an academic, Archie had a wide range of interests chief among them
temperature regulation and blood clotting. He has to withstand kidding for the
USAF sponsored research early in his a career on the effect of low
environmental temperature on body heat regulation. He would sit in a walk-in
freezer at 40 below zero when Minnesota outdoor temperatures were 20 below
doing his research. Only a devoted physiologist would indulge his curiosity in
such extremes. Archie returned to his research interests in body temperature
regulation late in his career cooperating with others researching the outdoor
calf hutch rearing practice. He was interested in hypothermia and fever and
never felt that the two conditions were adequately differentiated. He authored
many significant articles which have appeared in professional journals and
other noted publications. Mentally, he was always doing research.
Archie cared a great deal about his role as a teacher and researcher in
Veterinary Physiology. He did not seek recognition. He was an effective
teacher and an example to students, undergraduate, professional and graduate
students at all levels of accomplishment. He knew that, in addition to
knowledge of veterinary science and manipulative skills, concern for others,
integrity, reliability and fairness were very important characteristics for
those who entered the Veterinary Medical profession. Those that worked with
him knew that Archie had those qualities.
From the veterinary student's perspective, he was a teacher who was tough and
demanding, supportive and a good mentor. From a colleague's perspective, he
was a man known for his keen sense of humor and ready story to share. He could
be distinguished by his crew cut, bow tie, honesty, ability to keep a
confidence, no indulgence in gossip or character assassination, generosity,
spiritually rooted, always gentle and constructive language, devoted husband
and father, and challenging teacher. All that knew him have been privileged to
have been in his company.
Archie continued to seek out ways to continue to be a responsible, productive
citizen and so continued to serve the community after his retirement from the
University by volunteering at the Hubbs Learning Center where he taught reading
and math. Archie also volunteered many hours of service to his church, doing
whatever was in his capacity to do. In his love for animals, he was an avid
bird watcher and imparted his love of birds to his children and
grandchildren.
His marriage of 55 years produced four children: Thomas (Nancy), Susan
(Charles) West, Stephen (Deborah), and Barbara (Daniel) Roloff; and seven
grandchildren: Julie and Taryn Good, David West, Scott and Kimberly Good, and
Thomas and Cara Roloff.
Archie was a man who made family a priority and showed his devotion by giving
us his time, love, care and generosity. Though we are proud of Archie's
academic record and accomplishments and his willingness to serve the community,
we will remember him for his wonderful, endearing personal qualities that
caused us to know and be secure in his love for us.
Paul R. Hasbargen
Professor
Agriculture Economics
1929-1999
Carole Y. Keels
Professor
Social Sciences-UMM
1944-1999
Iftikhar A. Khan
Associate Professor
English
1924-1999
Burtrum C. Schiele
Professor
Psychiatry
1904-1999
Clark D. Starr
Professor
Communication Disorders
1927-1999
Eric N. Stokes
Professor
Music
1930-1999
George T. Tani
Professor
Ophthalmology
1915-1999
Dr. George T. Tani, ophthalmologist and retired clinical professor at the
University of Minnesota School of Medicine, died of pulmonary cardiac arrest on
March 22, 1999 at the age of 83.
Tani was born on December 16, 1915 in Oakland, California. He graduated from
the University of California School of Optometry in 1939. During World War II,
he was interned at a relocation camp in Idaho for Japanese-Americans where he
served as the camp tometrist. He was released in 1943 to serve as an autopsy
assistant in Chicago. In 1944, he joined the Army's U.S. Military Intelligence
Language School at Fort Snelling. Tani married his wife, Yoshi, in 1945 at the
Fort Snelling Chapel.
Tani was accepted by the University of Minnesota Medical School in 1947, and
graduated in 1950. His Ophthalmology Residency was at the Mayo Clinic. He
established his own clinic, Tani Eye Associates, where he was later joined by
his sons, Doug and Paul, practice. He dedicated more than 30 years of his life
to teaching at the University of Minnesota and Regions Hospital in St. Paul.
In addition, he worked hard to secure philanthropic support for the Department
of Ophthalmology at the University of Minnesota. To recognize 30 years of
volunteers service to the University's ophthalmology department and the Lion's
Eye Bank, Tani was awarded the first Outstanding Alumni Service Award from the
Vision Foundation in 1991. In 1993, he received the Asian-Pacific Leadership
Award from the State of Minnesota Council on Asian-Pacific Minnesotans for
providing community and health services. Tani was former president of the Mayo
Clinic Ophthalmology Alumni Association, the University of Minnesota Medical
Alumni Association, the Japan American Society of Minnesota and the North
Maplewood Lions Club.
At his memorial service, colleagues remembered Tani as a generous, caring man
dedicated to his students, his clients and his country. He is survived by his
wife, Yoshi; a daughter, Kay; two sons, Paul and Doug; a brother, three
sisters, seven granddaughters and a great-grandson.
STUDENTS
Kristopher Jung Jae Clyne
College of Liberal Arts
XIV. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
XV. NEW BUSINESS
NONE
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 3:44 p.m.
Rebecca Hippert
Abstractor