1995-96                   UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA                        No. 6

                         UNIVERSITY SENATE MINUTES
                               MAY 16, 1996

      The sixth meeting of the University Senate for 1995-96 was convened in 
25 Law Building, Minneapolis campus, on Thursday, May 16, 1996, at 2:25 p.m.  
Coordinate campuses were linked by telephone.  Checking or signing the roll as 
present were 130 voting faculty/academic professional members, 24 voting 
student members, 3 ex officio members, and 5 nonmembers.  President Nils 
Hasselmo presided.


                             I. INTRODUCTIONS

      President Hasselmo introduced Dr. Stephanie Liberman, newly-appointed 
Director of the Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Office.  After brief 
remarks by Dr. Lieberman, the Senate welcomed her to the University with a 
warm round of applause.


                  II. ELECTION OF VICE CHAIR FOR 1996-97
Action

      Professor W. Andrew Collins, was elected Vice Chair of the University 
Senate for 1996-97.


                    III. FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
                           Code of Conduct
                              Action

MOTION:

      To approve the following Code of Conduct:

                             CODE OF CONDUCT

RESPONSIBLE UNIVERSITY OFFICER

President

RESPONSIBLE OFFICE

Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs

POLICY STATEMENT

All members of the University of Minnesota community are expected to adhere to 
the highest ethical standards of professional conduct and integrity. The 
values we hold among ourselves to be essential to responsible professional 
behavior include:  honesty, trustworthiness, respect and fairness in dealing 
with other people, a sense of responsibility toward others and loyalty toward 
the ethical principles espoused by the institution.  Additionally, all members 
of the University community are responsible for adherence to University 
policies and procedures and are expected to comply with State and Federal 
laws.  It is important that these values and the tradition of ethical behavior 
be consistently demonstrated, and carefully maintained.

The following guidelines relate to activities involved in interacting 
professionally with students, colleagues, and members of the public, in 
creating scholarly products or works of art, in both acquiring and using data 
and in managing finances.

Guidelines for Activities 

Members of the University community have the obligation to respect and to be 
fair to all members of the community, especially students and those persons 
under their supervision, and to foster their intellectual and professional 
growth.  Members of the University community must not engage in, nor permit, 
discrimination and harassment.  Intellectual freedom must be supported and 
persons must not abuse the authority they have been given.  Furthermore, care 
must be taken to ensure that any personal relationships do not result in 
situations that might interfere with objective judgment.

Work place and educational experiences must impart appropriate standards of 
professional conduct through instruction and example.  Members of the 
University community are expected to conscientiously fulfill their obligations 
toward students, toward advisees, toward colleagues and toward performing 
their duties as part of the University community.

All members of the University community are expected to understand and comply 
with laws and regulations related to their work.  Administrators and 
supervisors are expected to see that those who report to them are informed 
about, understand and comply with regulations such as those for health and 
safety in the workplace, including the procedures to assure the ethical 
treatment of human subjects and animals and the use of hazardous materials.  
Those involved in the maintenance of private personnel and student data have 
the obligation to fully comply with the MN Government Data Practices Act.

Authorship

In an academic environment we continually seek after knowledge and 
understanding and must transmit our findings faithfully.  All authors on a 
published work are responsible for the accuracy and fairness of the presented 
information.  All  creators of scholarly products or works of art guarantee 
the originality of their work and the provision of credit for the ideas of 
others upon whom their work is built.

It is expected that individuals be considered for inclusion as authors on work 
submitted for publication if they have contributed substantially 
intellectually to the work.  Special care must be taken to clarify authorship 
with entry level professional persons such as graduate students, post doctoral 
fellows and trainees, preferably before the work is begun.  It is 
inappropriate to include individuals as authors if they contributed only 
peripherally to the work, e.g., providing lab space, equipment or funding; 
being involved in patient care; providing patient samples; or having a 
supervisory position.  

Peer Review

Any material received to review for funding or publication is confidential and 
the ideas contained therein must not be used in any other manner by the 
reviewer unless specifically permitted.

Data Collection and Management

Falsification, fabrication and unacknowledged appropriation of the data of 
others is unethical and will not be tolerated.  At the outset of any research 
project all participants are expected to discuss and agree upon data 
management and access and retention procedures including procedures for having 
participants join or leave the project.  Privacy of collected data and rights 
to intellectual property must be protected.  Student rights to data are 
expected to be clearly specified.

All documentation necessary to reconstruct investigations is expected to be 
available and data is to be recorded in a timely and consistent manner.

Fiscal Responsibilities

Members of the University community must not accept money for research or 
gifts on behalf of the University or as part of their University activities 
except as prescribed by University policy.  All funds provided for research 
are expected to be spent in ways consistent with the funding documents and in 
compliance with the guidelines on allowable costs.  The University has the 
obligation to provide up-to-date records of financial transactions.  
Individuals in charge of budgets have an obligation to monitor records of 
expenditures for compliance with University policies and procedures and to 
allow these records to be viewed by appropriate parties.  Departmental files 
are the property of the University.

REASON FOR POLICY

To demonstrate the Universityıs commitment to the highest standards of 
professional conduct.

WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY

All members of the University community have the obligation to learn about and 
adhere to the principles embodied in this policy while the University has the 
obligation to provide the opportunities necessary to assure awareness.

RELATED INFORMATION

Several other University policies are related to this one.  These include, 
among others: Academic Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, Faculty and Staff-
Grievance Procedure, Sexual Assault, Campus Health and Safety.  On-line access 
to these policies is provided through the Universityıs web site.

CONTACTS

The main contact is the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs.  In 
addition information can be obtained from the Office of the General Counsel, 
Chancellors, Provosts, Deans, Department Heads, and Directors.

                                                          DANIEL FEENEY, Chair
                                                     Faculty Affairs Committee

DISCUSSION:

      Professor Carl Adams, chair of the Faculty Consultative Committee, and 
Professor Daniel Feeney, chair of the Faculty Affairs Committee, presented the 
motion to consider the proposed Code of Conduct which they said received 
favorable endorsement from both committees.  The policy was developed in 
response to recent findings by the NIH and to present a unified statement of 
expectations with respect to behavior.  Related policies include the  Academic 
Misconduct Policy, Conflict of Interest Policy, Sexual Assault Policy, faculty 
and staff grievance policies and procedures, and the Campus Health and Safety 
Policy.

      No comments or questions about the proposal were forthcoming and the 
President moved to the vote.  The policy was then approved by a majority of 
members present and voting.

                                                                      APPROVED


                        IV. PRESIDENT'S REPORT

      The President reported on the following:

      1)  The accreditation team from the North Central Association recently 
completed its visit to the University.  In preparation for the visit, a 
comprehensive report was prepared by the Office of Academic Affairs under the 
leadership of Senior Vice President Infante and Professor Thomas Scott, chair 
of the accreditation advisory committee.  The President said he believes the 
visit went well and expects the Association's report in 6-8 weeks.

      2)  The Board of Regents recently approved the budget for fiscal year 
1996-97 which makes the best possible compromise of the available State funds.  
While compromises had to be made, the proposal does include some significant 
additional investments and provides an all too modest compensation increase 
for employees.

      3)  Discussions of the 1997-99 biennial request are underway.  By the 
July Board meeting a conceptualized approach is expected to be ready.  In 
September, the budget will be presented to the Board for review with action 
scheduled for October.  The President said he expects a proposal to emerge 
that will strike the same kind of balance that was sought in the last request.  
In other words, a request that includes University self-help, selected tuition 
increases, and a request for increased State funding.  The University is 
operating against a backdrop of House File 1856, which sets budget levels for 
1997-99.  The University will go forward with an aggressive approach and try 
to demonstrate the enormous efforts the faculty, staff, and administrators 
have made to become more efficient, use State resources more judiciously, and 
save wherever it is possible.  

     4)  Candidates for the position of interim Senior Vice President for 
Academic Affairs are being considered and a recommendation is expected to be 
made to the Board of Regents in June.  


                      V. QUESTIONS TO THE PRESIDENT

Question:   There have been rumors that the fringe benefit rate 
            for graduate assistants will continue to increase 
            significantly during the next two years.  These high 
            rates place a serious hardship on research programs.  
            Please comment on this issue.  
Response:   President Hasselmo deferred to Senior Vice President 
            Infante for a response to the question.  Vice 
            President Infante confirmed that the rumors were 
            correct and cited some of the reasons, including:  1) 
            a significant decrease in the total base salaries on 
            which fringe benefits are based, and 2) issues 
            associated with FICA taxes.  The matter is under 
            review at the present time, particularly how benefits 
            should be funded.  

Question:   Would reducing tuition rates for graduate students  
            solve the problem?  

Response:   Vice President Infante replied that reducing tuition 
            would be a form of buy down through the use of 
            internal funds and would have certain implications on 
            the nature of tuition at the undergraduate and 
            graduate levels.


                 VI. SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT

      Professor Carl Adams took a brief moment to express appreciation to 
members of the Senate Consultative Committee for their dedication and hard 
work during the year and to all committee members and chairs who handled the 
blizzard of issues ranging from semester conversion to the tenure review, and 
finally to senators for their many contributions to the governance process.


                           VII. OLD BUSINESS

                                 NONE

                           VIII. NEW BUSINESS

     A motion to suspend the rules to consider the following resolution was 
approved.

MOTION:

      To approve the following Resolution:

RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs Ettore Infante has 
resigned from this position effective July 1, 1996; and

WHEREAS, An interim Vice President for Academic Affairs will be appointed for 
a period that might well continue into at least the first year of the next 
President's administration; and

WHEREAS, The University of Minnesota students, faculty, staff, administration, 
and Regents are arguably engaged in the most important debate about its 
structure and future in the modern history of the University; and

WHEREAS, This debate and the resultant decisions and actions require 
articulate and energetic leadership by this chief academic officer of the 
University; and

WHEREAS, It is of the utmost importance that those who are represented by this 
Senate have the highest level of confidence in the leadership, knowledge and 
experience of the interim Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs; and

WHEREAS, This interim appointment provides the opportunity to strengthen and 
re-invigorate the partnership between the faculty, administration and Board of 
Regents, and to unite us in a common goal to preserve the University during a 
year that could decisively determine its future;

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT the Senate recommends that President Nils 
Hasselmo appoint an Interim Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs:

      Who has a distinguished record of research and scholarship;
      Who has a distinguished record of teaching and involvement with student 
      affairs;
      Who is highly respected by faculty, students and staff; and
      Who has a distinguished record of service to the University and to the 
      community.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT this appointment be announced as soon as possible 
in order that this opportunity to assure and enhance the partnership between 
the constituents of this Senate and the administration may benefit from the 
visible involvement of the Interim Senior Vice President designate.

DISCUSSION:

      The Resolution was approved by a majority of members present and voting 
after several "friendly" amendments were accepted by the presenters of the 
motion.

                                                                      APPROVED


        IX. TRIBUTE TO DECEASED MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY

                                   FACULTY

                               Jean L. Johnson
                                  1932-1996

                               J. Morris Blair
                                  1919-1996

      J. Morris Blair, Professor Emeritus with the School of Physics and 
Astronomy, died March 18, 1996.  Morris joined the physics faculty at 
Minnesota in 1950, retired in 1989 and continued work in his basement office 
until his death.  While a graduate student, Morris worked on the Manhattan 
Project in 1946 at Los Alamos National Laboratory and witnessed the first 
atomic bomb test.  He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of 
Minnesota in 1946 and held postdoctoral positions at Argonne National 
Laboratories and Minnesota.  Morris was an expert designer of equipment.  He 
upgraded the University's 4MV Van de Graaff accelerator.  He designed the 
University's John H. Williams Laboratory for Nuclear Physics, where he oversaw 
the installation of a tandem Van de Graaff.  Morris was extensively involved 
in undergraduate education and for years was Director of Physics Undergraduate 
Teaching Laboratories where he developed many new experiments for 
undergraduate students and taught sophomore laboratory courses.  Morris is 
survived by his wife, Kay; sons, John of Oakdale and Carl of St. Paul; 
daughter-in-law, Kim; a sister, Ann Blair of Harrisonburg, VA; and one 
grandson.


                            A. Dean Hendrickson
                                 1927-1996

      Dr. A. Dean Hendrickson had a 45-year career in Minnesota teaching 
mathematics to both K-12 and university students.  Dr. Hendrickson was 
employed at the University of Minnesota, Duluth (UMD) from September 1966 
until his retirement September 1, 1994.  He was a nationally known scholar in 
mathematics education, received several grants from the National Science 
Foundation for innovative work in teaching mathematics, and played a 
leadership role in the development of the new standards for the National 
Council for Teachers of Mathematics.

   Professor Hendrickson died March 14, 1996 from cancer.  A memorial fund for 
prospective mathematics teachers has been established at UMD to further his 
goal of assisting exemplary young people who plan to become teachers of 
mathematics.


                             William Paradise
                                1939-1996

      Professor William Paradise began his employment with the University of 
Minnesota, Crookston (UMC) in September of 1967 as a member of the Business 
Division accounting faculty.  He was the first person hired to teach 
accounting as that was the beginning of the transition of the Crookston campus 
from a high school to a two year college.  Professor Paradise taught the 
beginning and advanced accounting courses for nearly 30 years at UMC.  He 
served as an academic advisor to numerous students and served on several 
campus committees.  The past two years he served as chair of the UMC Faculty 
Consultative Committee.  As a professional, he attended many conferences over 
the years to keep current in accounting and was one of the first faculty to 
incorporate the use of computers into his instruction.  He was an extremely 
knowledgeable and thoughtful person who challenged his students to achieve to 
their potential.  The UMC students, faculty, and administration and Crookston 
community appreciate his contributions and will miss him.


                              X. ADJOURNMENT

      The meeting was adjourned at 2:50 p.m.

                                                               Martha Kvanbeck
                                                                    Abstractor