CONSECUTIVE
MEETINGS OF:
THE
UNIVERSITY
SENATE
THE
FACULTY SENATE
THURSDAY,
MAY 1, 2008
2:30
- 5:00 P.M.
25
Mondale Hall--Twin Cities
Campus
308 Selvig Hall--Crookston
Campus
Kirby Student Center Garden
Room--Duluth Campus
Prairie
Lounge--Morris Campus
This is a
consecutive meeting of the University Senate and Faculty Senate. There are 236
voting members of the University Senate and 161 voting members of the Faculty
Senate. A simple majority must be present for a quorum. Most actions require
only a simple majority for approval. Actions requiring special majorities for
approval are noted under each of those items.
1. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSES TO SENATE
ACTIONS
Information
University
Senate
|
Resolution
on Retiree Benefits
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
University
Senate November 29, 2007
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Administration
PENDING
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Board of
Regents – no action required
|
|
Amendments
to the Protocol for Senate Committee Involvement in Central Administrator
Searches
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
University
Senate March 6, 2008
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Administration
PENDING
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Board of
Regents – no action required
|
|
Resolution
on Fair Trade Coffee
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
University
Senate April 3, 2008
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Administration
PENDING
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Board of
Regents – no action required
|
|
Resolution to Offset Imputed
Income Tax Related to Same-Sex Domestic Partner Benefits
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
University
Senate April 3, 2008
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Administration
PENDING
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Board of
Regents – no action required
|
Faculty
Senate
|
2012-13
Morris and Twin Cities Calendars
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Faculty
Senate March 6, 2008
|
|
Approved by the:
|
Administration PENDING
|
|
Approved by the:
|
Board of Regents – no
action required
|
|
Resolution
on the Budget Model
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Faculty
Senate April 3, 2008
|
|
Approved by the:
|
Administration PENDING
|
|
Approved by the:
|
Board of Regents – no
action required
|
|
Resolution
on a Faculty Expertise Database
|
|
Approved
by the:
|
Faculty
Senate April 3, 2008
|
|
Approved by the:
|
Administration PENDING
|
|
Approved by the:
|
Board of Regents – no
action required
|
2. CLERK OF THE SENATE REPORT
Committee on
Committees Election Results
Information for the Faculty Senate
FOR
INFORMATION:
In the
recent election to fill Twin Cities vacancies on the Committee on Committees,
Professors Jay Coggins, Roberta Humphreys, Jennifer Kuzma, Carol Lange, and
Joanna O'Connell were elected to three-year terms (July 1, 2008 through June 30,
2011).
STUART
GOLDSTEIN, CLERK
UNIVERSITY
SENATE
3.
EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Collection
and Reporting of Grade Data and Syllabus Requirements
Information
for the University Senate
FOR
INFORMATION:
On
February 18, 1999, in adopting a policy on "Collection and Reporting of Grade
Data and Syllabus Requirements," the Senate Committee on Educational Policy was
required to provide to the Senate "data on the mean grade point average by
designator and course level, on the percentage of As awarded by course level,
and overall collegiate grade point averages . . . for grades awarded each Fall
Semester." The policy also provides that "data should be reported for all
undergraduate students."
COMMENT:
These data will be distributed
at the meeting and are available on the web at:
http://www.irr.umn.edu/grades/.
CATHRINE WAMBACH, CHAIR
EDUCATIONAL POLICY
COMMITTEE
4.
TRIBUTE TO DECEASED MEMBERS OF THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY
FACULTY/ACADEMIC
PROFESSIONALS/STAFF
Sarabeth
Barnes
Professor
General College
1923 – 2008
Samuel B.
Feinberg
Professor
Radiology
1922 – 2008
Thea
Hodge
Academic Professional
Computer Science
1922 –
2008
Ralph E.
Rapson
Professor
Architecture and Landscape Architecture
1914
– 2008
Edward B.
Savage
Professor
Rhetoric
1923 – 2008
5.
SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
REPORT
(5 minutes)
6.
MINUTES FOR APRIL 3, 2008
Action by
the University Senate
(2
minutes)
MOTION:
To approve
the University Senate and Faculty Senate minutes, which are available on the Web
at the following URL. A simple majority is required for approval.
http://www1.umn.edu/usenate/usen/080403sen.html
STUART
GOLDSTEIN, CLERK
UNIVERSITY
SENATE
7.
FACULTY CONSULTATIVE
COMMITTEE
Academic Misconduct
Policy
Action by the University
Senate
(10 minutes)
The
text of the motion will be available at the meeting.
GARY
BALAS, CHAIR
FACULTY CONSULTATIVE
COMMITTEE
8.
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Patents and
Commercialization of Intellectual
Property
Action by the University
Senate
(20 minutes)
The
text of the motion will be available at the meeting.
DAN
DAHLBERG, CHAIR
RESEARCH
COMMITTEE
9.
RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Openness in
Research
Action by the University
Senate
(20 minutes)
The
text of the motion will be available at the meeting.
DAN
DAHLBERG, CHAIR
RESEARCH
COMMITTEE
10.
PRESIDENT’S REPORT
(10
minutes)
11.
QUESTIONS TO THE PRESIDENT
(10
minutes)
Questions
to the President should be submitted in writing to the University Senate office
no later than Tuesday, April 29, 2008. The President may also choose to take
questions from the floor.
12.
UNIVERSITY SENATE OLD BUSINESS
13.
UNIVERSITY SENATE NEW BUSINESS
14.
UNIVERSITY SENATE ADJOURNMENT
_______________________________________________________________
THIS
CONCLUDES THE UNIVERSITY SENATE
BUSINESS.THE SUBSEQUENT ITEMS ARE
FACULTY SENATE BUSINESS
ONLY._______________________________________________________________MEETING
OF THE FACULTY SENATE
15.
FACULTY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
REPORT
(5 minutes)
16.
FACULTY LEGISLATIVE LIAISON
UPDATE
(5 minutes)
17.
REPORT OF THE FACULTY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
FOR
THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE ELECTION
Action
by TC Faculty and Academic Professional Members
(2
minutes)
The
names of the candidates will be available at the meeting.
GARY
BALAS, CHAIR
FACULTY CONSULTATIVE
COMMITTEE
18. ELECTION OF FACULTY SENATE
OFFICERS
Action by the Faculty Senate
(2 minutes)
The names
of the 2008-09 Faculty Senate Vice Chair, Clerk, and Parliamentarian will be
announced at the meeting.
GARY
BALAS, CHAIR
FACULTY CONSULTATIVE
COMMITTEE
19.
FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
FACULTY
CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
Health Care
Savings Plan Proposal
Action by the
Faculty Senate
(20
minutes)
The
text of the motion will be available at the meeting.
GEOFFREY
SIRC, CHAIR
FACULTY AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE
GARY
BALAS, CHAIR
FACULTY CONSULTATIVE
COMMITTEE
20.
EDUCATIONAL POLICY
COMMITTEE
Revised Educational
Policies
Discussion by the Faculty
Senate
(20 minutes)
FIRST
SECTION FOR DISCUSSION
2.
Exams & Study Days
The Senate
Committee on Educational Policy shall have the authority to grant waivers to the
provisions of this policy, and shall report such waivers to the Faculty Senate
at its next meeting.
Examinations
During the Term
1.
Examinations during the term (e.g., mid-terms) shall normally be given only
during the regular class sessions, except that make-up exams may be given at
other times arranged to accommodate student class schedules. Otherwise, exams
may be held at times other than the regularly scheduled class period only under
unusual circumstances, and only if approved by the dean of the college. Any
regularly-scheduled examination to be held outside of regular class time must be
listed in the published class schedule.
2.
Accommodation must be provided by the examining department to any student who
encounters an academic conflict, such as between an examination scheduled
outside of regular class time and the regular class period of another course, or
if two exams are scheduled to be held simultaneously outside of regular class
time.
3.
Take-home examinations are specifically exempted from this policy.
Final
Examinations
1. All
classes that normally permit undergraduates to enroll shall follow a standard
examination schedule. Final examinations on the Twin Cities campus shall extend
over a six-day period. Coordinate campuses shall each determine the length of
their final examination period.
2. Final
examinations normally shall be two (clock) hours long; instructors may schedule
longer examinations with the approval of their department. Instructors and
departments must decide in advance of scheduling a course if the examination is
to exceed two hours. Any examinations which exceed two hours must be noted in
the class schedule, in order that students are informed and can try to
accommodate the longer examination in their schedule of final examinations.
Accommodation must be provided by the examining department to any student who
encounters a conflict with another final examination because of this lengthened
examination time.
3. For
courses that do not run for a full semester, the final examination shall be
administered (or due, in the case of take-home or other out-of-class
examinations) on the last day of the course.
4. The
requirement that the final examination period on the Twin Cities campus be six
days shall not apply to units which have been granted an exemption from the
University calendar by the Senate Committee on Educational Policy.
5. Final
Examinations at Times Other Than Regularly Scheduled
a.
Instructors are not permitted to schedule their final examinations outside of
the scheduled examination period, except under such unusual circumstances as may
be approved by the Senate Committee on Educational Policy. Requests to change
the time of the final examination must be made to the appropriate academic
officer on the campus, who will bring them to the Senate Committee on
Educational Policy.
b. When
an instructor and students conclude they wish to move the final examination for
the course to a different time and/or day during the final examination period,
the change must be (1) proposed by the instructor, (2) have the concurrence of
the department chair, and (3) must be approved unanimously by the students, via
written secret ballot.
c.
Laboratory practicums may be given during the final week of classes during the
normal lab period, and take-home or other out-of-class finals may be distributed
prior to the final exam week but may not be due before the scheduled final exam
for that course.
6.
Students with final examination conflicts, or with three (or more) final
examinations in one calendar day,[ or who have agreed to reschedule a final (in
accord with the provisions of section 3, above) will be expected to make the
appropriate rescheduling arrangements with the instructors by the end of the
second week of the term THIS LANGUAGE NEEDS ATTENTION] so that conflicts will
be eliminated. Instructors must agree to give an alternative final examination
to any student having examination conflicts or three (or more) examinations in
one calendar day.
7. Summer
Session Final Examinations: Final examinations for summer session shall be
scheduled during the regular meeting time of the course on the last day.
Study
Day
Each
campus shall decide whether or not to have a study day. For campuses that
choose to have one, the final examination period shall begin on the second day
after classes end, with the day after classes designated as a study day. In the
event classes end on a Friday, final examinations shall not start until the
following Monday. When the calendar permits, a study day should be added to the
schedule.
Classes
and Events during the Study Day/Finals Week Period
1. No
classes will be permitted after the last day of instruction for any course that
normally includes undergraduate students.
2.
Instructors may not hold a regular lecture during examination week (which can
interfere with students' other exams) and may not hold a lecture during the
first hour of the examination period and then conduct the final examination
during the remaining hour(s).
3. No
University-sponsored extra-curricular events which require the participation of
students may be scheduled from the beginning of Study Day to the end of Finals
Week. Exceptions to this policy may be granted ONLY by the Senate Committee on
Educational Policy. Any exemption granted pursuant to this policy (that is,
with the explicit authorization of the Senate Committee on Educational Policy)
shall be honored so that students who are unable to complete course requirements
during Finals Week as a result of that exemption shall be provided an
alternative and timely opportunity to do so.
Intercollegiate
Athletic
Events during Study Day and Finals Week
1. In
those instances where post-season competitive events occur during Study Day or
Finals Week (either of Day School or of Extension Classes), the Senate Committee
on Educational Policy shall consider them approved (that is, without requiring
explicit action on the part of the Committee) subject to the following
conditions:
a. The
event is in logical progression in the sport, leading from in-season competition
to conference or regional championships and then to national championship
competition;
b. The coach or other staff member in the athletic program
can demonstrate to whomever is responsible for counseling in the intercollegiate
athletics program that satisfactory alternative academic arrangements have been
made; and
c. The
event is conducted under the aegis of the NCAA or the appropriate national sport
governing body if it is not the NCAA.
2. The
academic counseling office for intercollegiate athletics will provide annually
to the chair of the Senate Committee on Educational Policy a report on the
arrangements that are made pursuant to paragraph 2, above.
3. The
Director of Athletics annually will report to the Senate Committee on
Educational Policy, early in the Fall Semester, on the number of
student-athletes who missed any Study Day or any part of Final Examinations
during the preceding year and on the academic performance of those
student-athletes. These must be written reports.
4.
Post-season or other athletic events that are invitational in nature, rather
than a natural progression to a championship, and which would take place during
Study Day or Finals Week, require the specific approval of the Senate Committee
on Educational Policy before participation may occur.
5.
Subject only to the exception noted in this policy, no travel or competition is
permitted from the period beginning with, and including, Study Day and ending
with the last day of Final Examinations. Home events may be scheduled in the
evening of the last day of Final Examinations if the examination schedule is
concluded by 1800.
6. This
policy applies only to intercollegiate athletic teams, not teams competing under
the aegis of the Department of Recreational Sports or any other unit of the
University.
POLICY ON
SPECIAL EXAMINATIONS FOR CREDIT AND PROFICIENCY
The
University of Minnesota offers currently registered undergraduate degree-seeking
students the opportunity to take special examinations, given at the discretion
of the appropriate academic department, either for proficiency or for credit.
Special
examinations shall be administered by the appropriate academic department, with
administrative oversight through the Office of the Registrar (via OneStop). The
University will charge an appropriate fee for all special examinations. The
department determines whether the examination will result in one of the
following:
(1) proficiency (yielding no credit but fulfilling prerequisites for advanced
courses or satisfying other requirements;
(2)
credit for a specific course
(3)
for credit for a general “blanket” number (such as
2999).
The
student’s college has the final authority for accepting or denying credits
towards the student’s degree program in that college. Credits earned by
examination shall not count as residence credits. A student may not first take a
University of Minnesota course and earn a grade, subsequently take an
examination for credit for that course content, and then request that the
original course grade be bracketed from the transcript.
A
student must do "C-" quality work on an "examination for credit" to earn credit
or proficiency. If the examination is for credit, a notation shall be placed on
the transcript showing the course and credits earned. Effective fall 1999,
examinations for credit earn the letter "T." These credits will be included in
the cumulative credits (but not term credits) but the "T" grade will not be
reflected in either the term or cumulative grade point average. If the
examination is for proficiency, a notation shall be made on the student’s
transcript saying "Course X satisfied by proficiency examination." . If the
student fails to do "C-" quality work on the examination, no notation shall be
made on the transcript.
The
"examination" administered by a department may be a typical final examination,
an oral test, written papers or projects, or any other combination of work which
will satisfy the examiners that the student has adequately achieved the values
of the course.
Minimum
standards for awarding credits by examination shall be determined by the
academic department giving the examination. Once special exam credit has been
awarded, the credits will remain on the student's transcript unless the credit
was awarded in error.
Credit
for Nationally-Recognized Examinations
The
University, with the concurrence of the appropriate academic department, also
recognizes and awards credits based on examinations which are taken as a part of
the Advanced Placement (AP) program, the International Baccalaureate (IB)
Program, and CLEP program. Credits for AP and IB exams are awarded at the time a
student is admitted to the University, and the administrative process for these
awards is handled by the Admissions Office (as are transfer credit
awards).
Minimum
standards for awarding credits on nationally-administered examinations shall be
established by the appropriate academic department. No department shall be
required to offer credits for nationally-recognized tests. Credits may be
awarded for a particular course if the academic department reviewing the
national examination determines that the material in the test is substantially
similar to that of an existing course; if the material is judged to be of
college level but not substantially similar to an existing course, general
departmental credits are assigned. The Admissions Office works with departments
to assure that exams are reviewed and appropriate credit awards
established.
The
national examinations shall be reviewed every five years to determine whether
the minimum standards remain appropriate.
For
more detailed guidelines on credit awards for AP and IB, see the REPORT OF THE
REVIEW COMMITTEE ON AWARDING CREDIT FOR ADVANCED PLACEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL
BACCALAUREATE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA at
http://www1.umn.edu/usenate/reports/intlbamn.html
SECOND
SECTION FOR DISCUSSION
4.
Grading, Transcripts, & Credits
GRADING
AND TRANSCRIPTS
I.
Establishment and Use of University Grading Systems
1. There
are two distinct grading systems on each campus of the University of Minnesota,
A-B-C-D-F (with pluses and minuses as permitted by this policy) and S-N. The S-N
system is a self-contained alternative to the A-F system and the two may not be
combined for a particular student in a particular course. Students may receive
grades or symbols only from the grading system under which they have registered
for a course. This policy does not require any instructor to use pluses and
minuses.
2. There
are, in addition, registration symbols identified and described in this policy
that carry neither grade nor credit.
3.
No campus, college, or program is required to offer a course on the S-N
grading system.
4. Any
unit may choose to limit grades in a particular course to the A-F or the S-N
system.
5. When
both grading systems are available to a student, he or she must declare a choice
of system as part of the initial registration for the course. The choice may not
be changed after the end of the second week of classes (the first week in summer
sessions).
6. Except
as provided in this policy in Sections I (7) and V (10), no college may use any
grading systems other than the ones established by this policy.
7. The
Law School and the Medical School are exempt from the provisions of this policy,
but shall report their grading systems, and any changes therein, to the Senate.
Any other units which believe that the national norms of their profession
require a different grading system may make application to the Senate Committee
on Educational Policy for an exemption from this policy; all such exemptions
must be approved by the University Senate.
II.
PERMANENT GRADES FOR ACADEMIC WORK FOR CREDIT
1. The
list below identifies the possible permanent grades that can be given for any
course for which credit is to be awarded. These grades will be entered on a
student's official transcript and, for an A, B, C, or D with permitted pluses
and minuses, carry the indicated grade points. (Except for the Law School, the
University does not award A+ grades, nor are D- grades permitted). The S grade
shall not carry grade points but the credits shall count toward the student's
degree program if allowed by the college, campus, or program.
A 4.00
Represents achievement that is outstanding relative to the level necessary to
meet course requirements
A- 3.67
B+ 3.33
B 3.00 Represents
achievement that is significantly above the level necessary to meet course
requirements
B- 2.67
C+ 2.33
C 2.00 Represents achievement that
meets the course requirements in every
respect
C- 1.67
D+ 1.33
D 1.0 Represents achievement that is
worthy of credit even though it fails to meet fully the course
requirements
S Represents achievement that is satisfactory, which is
equivalent to a C- or better.
2. These
definitions apply to grades awarded to students who are not enrolled in graduate
programs, but the grade points are the same no matter the level or course of
enrollment.
3.
Instructors are permitted to hold graduate and undergraduate students who are in
the same class to different standards of academic performance and
accomplishment. The syllabus must make clear what the different standards will
be for the different groups of students who may be enrolled in the class.
4. These
are the general University standards. In connection with all symbols of
achievement instructors shall define for a class, at one of its earliest
meetings and as explicitly as possible, the performance that will be necessary
to earn each.
III.
PERMANENT GRADES FOR ACADEMIC WORK FOR NO CREDIT
1. There
are two permanent grades given for a course for which no credit is to be
awarded. These grades will be entered on a student's official transcript.
F -0-
Represents failure and signifies that the work was either (1) completed but at a
level of achievement that is not worthy of credit or (2) was not completed and
there was no agreement between the instructor and the student that the student
would be awarded an I (see Section IV).
N Represents
no credit and signifies that the work was either (1) completed but at a level of
achievement that is not worthy of credit or (2) was not completed and there was
no agreement between the instructor and the student that the student would be
awarded an I (see Section III). The N carries no gradepoints and the credits for
the course do not count toward any academic degree program. The credit hours for
the course do not count in the gradepoint average.
2.
Academic dishonesty: Academic dishonesty in any portion of the academic work
for a course shall be grounds for awarding a grade of F or N for the entire
course, at the discretion of the instructor. This provision
allows instructors to award an
F or an N to a student when academic dishonesty is discovered; it does not
require an instructor to do so.
Students who enroll for a course on the A-F grading system shall receive an F if
such grade is warranted; students who enroll for a course on the S-N system
shall receive an N if such grade is warranted.
IV.
INCOMPLETES
There
shall be a symbol I, incomplete, awarded to indicate that the work of the course
has not been completed.
1. The I
shall be assigned at the discretion of the instructor when, due to extraordinary
circumstances, the student who has successfully completed a substantial portion
of the course's work was prevented from completing the work of the course on
time.
2. The
assignment of an I requires a written agreement between the instructor and
student specifying the time and manner in which the student will complete the
course requirements. In no event may any such written agreement allow a period
of longer than one year to complete the course requirements (except as provided
in section IV(8).
3. Work
to make up an I must be submitted within one year of the last day of final
examinations of the term in which the I was given for all students except
graduate and professional students; if not submitted by that time, the I will
automatically change to an F (if the student was registered on the A-F system)
or an N (if the student was registered on the S-N system) for the course. If an
I changes automatically to an F or an N, the instructor has the discretion to
reinstate the I for one additional year.
4. For
graduate and professional students, an I remains on the transcript until changed
by the instructor or department.
5. When
an I is changed to another symbol, the I is removed from the record. Once an I
has become an F or an N, under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it may
subsequently be converted to any other grade, upon petition by the instructor
(or the department if the instructor is unavailable) to the college.
6. A
student does not need to be registered at the University in order to complete
the work necessary to convert an I to a grade with credit in the time and manner
previously agreed upon between the student and the instructor. The instructor is
expected to turn in the new grade within four weeks of the date the work was
submitted by the student. (Depending on the timing of when the work is turned
in and the ability of the instructor to award a grade, an F or an N may appear
temporarily on the transcript.)
7. If a
student graduates with an I on the transcript, the I will remain permanently an
I. A student may petition his or her college, within a year of graduation, to
complete the work in the course and receive a grade. The degree GPA is frozen
upon graduation but the cumulative GPA would reflect the change in GPA if a
student chooses to complete the work and change I to a grade within a year of
graduation.
8. When
students are called to active military duty, and reach agreement with their
instructor(s) to take an incomplete, they will have up to one calendar year
following their discharge from active duty to complete their
incomplete(s).
9.
Receipt of an I in a course does not create an entitlement for a student to take
the course a second time.
V.
OTHER TRANSCRIPT SYMBOLS
1.
Transfer work: There shall be a symbol T, transfer, posted as a prefix to the
original grade, to indicate credits transferred from another institution or from
one college or campus to another within the University when reevaluation is
required.
2.
Auditing a course:
a. There
shall be a symbol V, visitor, indicating registration as an auditor or visitor,
which shall carry no credit and no grade.
b.
Students auditing a course are required to pay full tuition but do not take
exams and are not required to do homework. An auditor is entered on the class
roster (grade report), is counted as filling a seat in a controlled entry
course, and is counted in an instructor's student contact hours. Students may
not sit in on a course without registering for it.
c. A
student shall be allowed to take a previously-audited class for a grade.
3.
Withdrawing from a course:
a. There
shall be a symbol W, withdrawal, entered upon a student's record when the
student officially withdraws from a course in accordance with procedures
established by the student's college or campus. The W will be entered on the
transcript irrespective of the student's academic standing in that course if the
student withdraws from the course during the third through eighth week of class
(during the second or third weeks of summer sessions).
b. If a
student officially withdraws from a course during the first two weeks of
classes, there shall be no record of that course registration entered on the
student's transcript.
c. Except
as provided in section d, withdrawal in the ninth or later week of classes
(fourth or later in summer sessions) shall require approval of the college and
may not be granted solely because a student is failing the course; there must be
extenuating non-academic circumstances justifying late withdrawal.
d. One
time late withdrawal: Each student may, once during his or her undergraduate
enrollment, withdraw from a course without college approval, and receive the
transcript symbol W, after the eighth week of class and at any time up to and
including the last day of class for that course.
4.
Continuation course: There shall be a symbol X, indicating a student may
continue in a continuation course in which a grade cannot be determined until
the full sequence of courses is completed. The instructor shall submit a grade
for each X when the student has completed the sequence.
5. Course
in progress: There shall be a symbol K, assigned by an instructor to indicate
the course is still in progress and that a grade cannot be assigned at the
present time.
VI.
OTHER PROVISIONS
1. Zero
credit courses: Courses which carry zero credits do not count in either term or
cumulative grade point averages.
2. All
grades for academic work are based on the quality of the work submitted, not on
hours of effort.
3.
Counting Credits Toward a University Degree
a. A
course that carries University credit toward a degree in one department or
college must carry credit in all other University departments and colleges
(except insofar as those credits exceed the limit on skills credits established
in
b. A
department or college has discretion to decide whether a course compoleted in
another unit will count towards the college or department/program
requirements.
4. When a
student graduates, no further changes to his or her transcript will be made (to
that portion of the transcript related to the program from which the student
graduated) except as expressly allowed under the provisions of this policy.
5.
Releasing transcripts: The University's official transcript, the chronological
record of the student's enrollment and academic performance, will be released by
the University only at the request of the student or in accord with state or
federal statutes.
6.
Repeating Courses
a. An
undergraduate student may repeat a course only once (except as noted in section
5(c)).
b. When a
student repeats a course before receiving his/her degree, (a) both grades for
the course shall appear on the official transcript, (b) the course credits may
not be counted more than once toward degree and program requirements, and (c)
only the last enrollment for the course shall count in the student's grade point
average.
c.
Provisions 6 (a) and (b) of this policy shall not apply to courses (1) using the
same number but where students study different content each term of enrollment
and (2) to courses designated as "repetition allowed."
d. If an
undergraduate student repeats a course after his/her degree has been awarded,
the original course grade will not be excluded from the degree GPA nor will the
new grade be included in the degree GPA.
e.
Bracketing is the practice of not including a course in the calculation of a
student's GPA and not counting the course as satisfying any degree requirements,
including electives, because a student has repeated a course. When a student
repeats a course, all prior attempts are bracketed and only the most recent
attempt counts (except as provided in 6 (c)). No department or college may
bracket the courses of another department or college for any reason other than
course repetition.
7. Grade
point average: Every student shall have calculated, both at the end of each
grading period (quarter or semester) and cumulatively, a grade point average,
which shall be the ratio of grade points earned divided by the number of credits
attempted with grades of A-F (including pluses and minuses). Both the periodic
and cumulative grade point average will appear on each student's record.
8. Final
grade due date: Final grades shall be submitted to the Registrar no later than
three business days following the date of the scheduled final examination
(whether or not there is actually a final examination for the course).
9. This
policy may be modified from time to time but transcripts will not be modified
when there are changes in policy.
10.
Compiling and Reporting Grading Data
a. Data
on the mean grade point average by designator and course level, on the
percentage of As awarded by course level, and on overall collegiate grade point
averages shall be prepared for grades awarded each Fall Semester. Data should be
reported for all undergraduate students. Cells in the tables with fewer than 10
grades should be suppressed, in order to protect the privacy of students, but
the numbers should be included in the totals.
b. The
Office of Institutional Research and Reporting should see that required tables
are produced each year and provide them to the chair of the Senate Committee on
Educational Policy and to the office of the Executive Vice President and
Provost.
c. The
data tables and graphs required in 10 (a) and (b) shall be reported annually to
the Senate. These data should also be provided to all deans and department heads
and made available to faculty and students.
11. All
colleges and campuses shall publish each term a dean's list, consisting of
students who achieved a 3.666 GPA or higher and who completed a minimum of 12
credits on the A-F grading system. There will be a transcript notation for each
term that a student achieves the dean's list.
[Moved to
repeating courses section]
[Moved to new section VI (3)]
10.
Alternative Grading Systems
a.
Only the Senate Committee on Educational Policy shall have the authority to
grant to individual colleges or campuses permission to use alternative grading
methods outside the provisions of this official University system, for a
specified period (but no longer than five years), and
only for the purpose of
experimenting with a new grading system for possible system-wide adoption. Such
permission may be granted if the proposal does not interfere significantly with
the registration options of students from other colleges, campuses, and
programs. Such alternative systems shall be reported for information to the
University Senate as soon as permitted and, after the specified period, shall be
re-evaluated, either to be discontinued, or with Senate approval on
recommendation from the Senate Committee on Educational policy, made part of the
system-wide policy. Except for the provisions of this section 6, no college or
program may use any grading system except for the one contained in this policy.
b.
Because alternative grading systems, once used, must be maintained by the
University forever afterward (to preserve the integrity of the transcripts), the
Senate Committee on Educational Policy will rarely grant permission for
alternative grading systems. It will consider doing so only when (1) those who
propose it can make a persuasive case that the alternative is a more accurate
and effective way to measure and record student academic performance, and (2)
there is strong reason to believe that the proposal will be useful to all
colleges and campuses of the University (except the Law School and Medical
School).
TRANSFER
OF CREDIT
1. It
shall be the responsibility of the Director of Admissions on each campus to
identify those institutions from which credit can be transferred and to
determine whether course work is college level. If questions arise with regard
to transfer of specific courses, the Director of Admissions will confer with the
appropriate college or departmental faculty. The following general guidelines
will apply.
2. Credit
for course work taken at other institutions will be transferred subject to the
following considerations:
a. the
mission of the institution from which credits would be transferred,
b. the
comparability of the course work with University of Minnesota course work, and
c. the
appropriateness of the course work for meeting baccalaureate degree requirements
at the University of Minnesota.
3.
Regional accreditation shall usually serve as the primary criterion for
determining the transferability of course work from another institution.
4.
Credits from technical schools may be considered for transfer when appropriate
to a student's degree program. Credit is not normally transferred from
specialized or proprietary institutions, military schools, or industry-based
education programs.
5. Credit
granted by another institution for non-traditional experiences (CLEP, AP, IB,
military training) will be re-evaluated for content and comparability by the
Office of Admissions.
6.
Religious studies courses transfer if they are not doctrinal, confessional, or
sectarian in nature. Religious studies courses from public institutions transfer
without special review; religious studies courses from all other institutions
will be evaluated by appropriate college or departmental faculty.
7. The
Twin Cities campus [University? What does UMM think?] shall not accept any
transfer course with less than a "D" grade. Once a course has been accepted for
transfer, all colleges and programs will honor this decision. (A course with a
grade of less than C- will not count toward a major or a minor but it will count
toward a degree.)
CATHERINE
WAMBACH, CHAIR
EDUCATIONAL POLICY
COMMITTEE
21.
FACULTY SENATE OLD BUSINESS
22.
FACULTY SENATE NEW BUSINESS
23.
FACULTY SENATE ADJOURNMENT