1995-96                   UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA                        No. 4
                    TWIN CITIES CAMPUS ASSEMBLY MINUTES

                               MAY 2, 1996

      The fourth meeting of the Twin Cities Campus Assembly for 1995-96 was 
convened in Mayo Auditorium, Minneapolis campus, on Thursday, May 2, 1996, at 
2:00 p.m.  Checking or signing the roll as present were 98 voting 
faculty/academic professional members, 17 student members, 4 ex officio 
members, and 7 nonmembers. Mr. Joel Bergstrom, Vice Chair of the Assembly, 
presided.


                    I. EDUCATIONAL POLICY COMMITTEE
        Twin Cities Undergraduate Course and Curriculum Committee
                                Action

        TWIN CITIES UNDERGRADUATE COURSE AND CURRICULUM COMMITTEE

INTRODUCTION

      The Assembly Committee on Educational Policy (ACEP) received a 
suggestion from Provost Shively and the Change to Semesters Coordinating Group 
that it should consider recommending the establishment of a Twin Cities campus 
undergraduate course and curriculum committee.  ACEP, after discussing it, was 
persuaded that there are several reasons that such a committee should be 
established. 

      (1)  All courses proposed for the semester system should be reviewed by 
an all-campus oversight faculty/student committee to ensure adherence to the 
Semester Conversion Standards, other Senate policies, and to guard as much as 
possible against course duplication and overlap.  The committee would also 
approve majors and programs for the semester system.

      (2)  The committee would establish guidelines for approval of semester 
courses.

      (3)  Once semester courses have been established, the committee would be 
responsible for adjudicating disputes between colleges about curriculum and 
course offerings.

      (4)  The committee would NOT duplicate the work of college curriculum 
committees, nor would it, except in rare instances, review the substantive 
content of courses.  (For example, an exception might be when two colleges 
appear to be offering courses with the same content.)

      This proposal goes beyond the change to semesters to issues of the 
University's financial environment and the possibility of implementation of 
Responsibility Center Management (RCM).  If units become more responsible for 
generating revenue through tuition, it will be imperative to have a 
faculty/student curriculum oversight body to govern competition among academic 
units.

MOTION:

      To amend Article III of the Bylaws of the Twin Cities Campus Assembly to 
add a new Bylaw 9, as follows:

9.  UNDERGRADUATE COURSE AND CURRICULUM COMMITTEE 

The Undergraduate Course and Curriculum Committee shall establish guidelines 
and procedures, within the framework of the educational policies adopted by 
the Senate and Twin Cities Assembly, to review all undergraduate course 
proposals that have been approved by the appropriate college curriculum 
committee in order to consider factors that would affect curriculum and 
policies across collegiate units and across the campus as a whole. 
Undergraduate courses are all courses numbered 0-XXX, 1-XXX, 3-XXX, and 5-XXX 
(except for 5-XXX courses limited to graduate or post-baccalaureate 
professional students).

MEMBERSHIP

The Undergraduate Course and Curriculum Committee shall be jointly appointed 
by the Twin Cities Assembly Committee on Educational Policy and the Provosts 
of the Twin Cities campus and shall be composed of tenured or tenure-track 
faculty and students.  It shall have 17 members:  8 faculty (5 appointed by 
the Committee on Educational Policy and 3 appointed by the provosts, one from 
each provostal unit), 6 deans (or faculty members or collegiate administrators 
with faculty rank designated by the dean, 3 of whom will be appointed by the 
Provost of Arts, Science and Engineering, 2 appointed by the Provost of the 
Professional Schools and 1 appointed by the Provost of the Academic Health 
Center), and 3 undergraduate students appointed the Committee on Committees, 
and ex officio representation as specified by vote of the Assembly.

The chair shall be a tenured faculty member, shall be appointed by the 
President of the University, and shall serve as an ex officio member of the 
Educational Policy Committee.  Until September 1, 2000, the position of the 
chair shall be a 50-percent time funded appointment.

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 

a.    To review all courses proposed for the change to semesters.

b.    To review and approve or disapprove all new undergraduate majors and 
      programs proposals. 

c.    To settle disputes between and among colleges involving a course or 
      courses.

d.    To establish timelines for submission of course proposals to the 
      committee.

e.    To develop guidelines for course approval and to review and approve or 
      disapprove course proposals, and to make suggestions for revisions of 
      course proposals.

      In developing the guidelines for course approval, the committee will use 
      the following criteria: 
 
      1.    Policies adopted by the University Senate and the Twin Cities 
            Campus Assembly, including but not limited to those that govern 
            the relationship between credits and contact time, the 
            relationship between credit and student academic effort, and the 
            number of credits necessary for graduation.

      2.    The degree and similarity between and among courses that are 
            offered in more than one college and will determine, with 
            consultation from the college curriculum committees, faculty 
            proposing the courses, and college administrators, the necessity 
            of offering similar courses and whether one or several courses 
            shall be offered. 

      3.    The overall undergraduate curriculum of the Twin Cities Campus, 
            including the appropriateness of programs offered, the balance of 
            the programs, and the requirements of the programs (including 
            those established by the Council on Liberal Education).

      4.    The time required for the completion of a program or degree.  
            Students making normal academic progress must be able to complete 
            the program or degree in 4 years.

f.    To report back to the college curriculum committees those courses that 
      have been approved, need revision, and disapproved, including the 
      rationale for disapproval.

g.    To report to the Assembly Committee on Educational Policy and the Twin 
      Cities campus provosts.

h.    To recommend to the Committee on Educational Policy such actions or 
      policies it deems appropriate.

i.    To submit an annual report to the provosts and to the Assembly.


COMMENT:

      The temporary funding for the chair's position, staff and general 
support, and summer salary supplements for (1997) for the membership, will be 
provided by central administration.  The Assembly Steering Committee has 
reviewed this proposal and recommends action by the Assembly.

                                                      LAURA COFFIN KOCH, Chair
                                                  Educational Policy Committee


                                                                     WITHDRAWN



                            II. OLD BUSINESS

                                  NONE



                           III. NEW BUSINESS

                                  NONE



                            IV. ADJOURNMENT

      The meeting was adjourned at 2:15 p.m.

                                                               Martha Kvanbeck
                                                                    Abstractor