1993-94                   UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA                        No. 4

                          STUDENT SENATE MINUTES
                              APRIL 14, 1994

     The fourth meeting of the Student Senate for 1993-94 was convened in 25 
Law Center, Minneapolis campus, on Thursday, April 14, 1994, at 12:00 noon.  
Coordinate campuses were linked by telephone.  Checking or signing the roll as 
present were 16 voting student members.  Mr. Erick Harper, Student Senate 
Chair, presided.

                          I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
                                  Action
                                                                      APPROVED
    

                    II. MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 17, 1994
                                 Action
                                                                      APPROVED


                              III. REPORTS
                              Information

STUDENT SENATE CHAIR--Mr. Erick Harper, Student Senate Chair, told senators 
that on March 30, the University and the State University system held a joint 
Lobby Day at the Capitol.  A press conference and rally was held in the 
morning which gave students an opportunity to express their views.  One issue 
that surfaced was the repeal of the one-third debt service on University 
buildings.  Lobby Day also afforded students an opportunity to meet with 
legislators.

STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE CHAIR--Mr. Love Goel reported that in a 
recent meeting with Associate Vice President Josie Johnson she expressed 
satisfaction that she is close to meeting the plan she set for herself for 
1994 regarding the recommendations of the Diversity Task Force.  Two of those 
goals were 1) increasing students of color at the University to 10% and 2) 
doubling the hiring of minority faculty.   Mr. Goel further said he had met 
with the President to discuss the tuition issue and expects a student 
resolution on tuition to be forthcoming.

STUDENT LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR--Mr. Bryan Jansen, Student Legislative Director, 
outlined the House and Senate Bills that are under consideration.  Included in 
the Bills is funding for work study programs, U2000 initiatives, and capitol 
bonding, however, the funding levels vary between the House and Senate in each 
area.


               IV. STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
                     Resolution on Bonding Priorities
                          Discussion and Action

MOTION:

     To approve the following Resolution:

                               RESOLUTION

     WHEREAS, the University of Minnesota faces a growing crisis stemming 
from the decay and obsolescence of existing buildings and facilities;

     WHEREAS, the cost of deferring maintenance increases yearly and becomes 
increasingly difficult to support;

     WHEREAS, deferred maintenance may already carry a cost burden of nearly 
a billion dollars;

     WHEREAS, continued deferral of maintenance and life safety improvements 
will have a serious effect on the functional, psychological, and financial 
well-being of the University's faculty, students, and staff;

     WHEREAS, the current state bonding process does not take sufficient 
account of the University's need for life safety improvements and facility 
renewal and maintenance;

     THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Student Senate supports the 
administration's emphasis on these matters at the Legislature;

     BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Student Senate encourages the University 
administration to develop a specific long-term strategy with the Legislature 
to define and fund the needed improvements.

DISCUSSION:

     Senator Rabun Taylor introduced the resolution.  He noted that the 
University's Legislative request this year included a significant increase for 
facilities management because of the severe deferred maintenance problem at 
the University.   He encouraged senators to support the resolution in order to 
send a strong message of support to the Administration for its efforts in this 
area.  With little discussion, the motion was approved unanimously.

                                                                      APPROVED


                        V. FINANCIAL AID PRESENTATION
                             Information and Action

     Item V. was withdrawn. 


                     VI. STUDENT SENATE REPRESENTATION
                                   Discussion

     The Student Senate briefly discussed the issue of student representation 
in the Senate.  According to the Senate Constitution, student representation 
is based on fulltime enrollment figures.  It has come to the attention of 
Senate officials that for many years the Registrar's Office has been 
submitting head count figures to the Senate instead of fulltime figures.  The 
mistake has resulted in greater student representation than was constituted by 
the Senate.  Using fulltime figures, students should have 45 Senate seats for 
1994-95.  Fulltime figures would place the total number of seats at 58.  The 
college most affected by the change is the Graduate School, which will lose 6 
seats.  Coordinate campus representation remains unchanged.  

     Mr. Raybun Taylor, Graduate School senator, argued that the Registrar's 
definition of a fulltime graduate student (9 or more credits) is not very 
realistic and recommended working with the Consultative Committee and the 
Registrar's Office to develop a more appropriate definition of a fulltime 
graduate student.


                            VII.  OLD BUSINESS

     The Student Lobby Advisory Committee's Legislative agenda for 1993-94, 
distributed to Student Senate members previously, was presented and endorsed 
by the Student Senate.


                           VIII.  NEW BUSINESS

                                     NONE


                             IX.  ADJOURNMENT

     The meeting was adjourned at 12:50 p.m.


                                                               MARTHA KVANBECK
                                                                    Abstractor