2002-03 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
SEPTEMBER
20, 2002
STUDENT SENATE MINUTES: No. 1
The first meeting of the Student Senate for 2002-03 was convened in 25
Mondale Hall, Minneapolis campus, on Thursday, September 20, 2002, at 12:10
p .m. Coordinate campuses were linked by telephone. Checking or signing the
roll as present were 38 voting student members and 1 ex officio member. Chair
Ryan Osero presided.
1. DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSOR DAN FEENEY,
CHAIR
OF THE FACULTY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
Faculty and Student Interactions
in the Senate
Ryan Osero noted the Professor Feeney was unable to attend today’s
meeting due the time change. He will be at the October 31 meeting to speak with
the students.
2. ORIENTATION
Ryan Osero reminded senators that copies of the Student Senate handbook and
a Parliamentary Procedures guide were available at the back of the room. He
then walked senators through the Parliamentary Procedures guide, noting the
purpose and principles behind parliamentary procedure. He reminded senators
that the Student Senate is only as strong as its members. Members can only be
effective if they attend meetings and come prepared to debate and vote on items,
which includes talking to the student’s constituency prior to the
meeting.
If senators wish to make a comment or ask a question during the
meeting, they should walk to a microphone and, after being recognized by the
chair, state their name and college before proceeding. Senators cannot ask
questions or make comments from their seats because this exchange will not be
tape recorded or be broadcast to the coordinate campus senators. These same
procedures will be used during the University Senate meetings.
In
closing, he said that senators should feel free to speak to himself, Eric
Steinhoff, Judy Berning, or Becky Hippert if they have any questions during the
year.
Eric Steinhoff, Vice Chair of the Student Senate, familiarized
senators with some parts of the Student Senate Handbook but asked students to
read through the entire handbook. He asked senators to look at the inside cover
for a list of common acronyms for committees within the University Senate. He
then referred senators to the University Senate website, which contains the
meeting schedule, list of senators, and past Student Senate minutes.
Senators are responsible to their student assembly/association and
college board, as well as to the Student Senate. He reviewed the procedures for
when senators cannot attend a meeting and the flowchart for the how the
University Senate operates.
Lastly, he said that the handbook contains
contact information for the senators as well as the Student Senate leadership.
Senators should review the contact information listed in the Student Senate
handbook and let Becky Hippert know of any changes.
Q: What happens if
there is an issue that requires immediate attention but the Student Senate is
not scheduled to meet in the near future?
A: The Student Senate Chair
should be made aware of the item of business, since it is possible to hold a
special meeting for urgent items of business or the item could be introduced
under New Business if the docket is already finalized. The item could also be
discussed by the Student Senate Consultative Committee (SSCC) since it has the
authority to act on behalf of the Student Senate.
3. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Ryan Osero announced that Legislative Network is hosting an alumni
breakfast on Saturday, October 12 and they need student volunteers to serve
breakfast and distribute flyers. If anyone is interested, please contact
him.
4. MINUTES FOR APRIL 25,
2002
Action
MOTION:
To approve the Student Senate minutes, which are
available on the Web at the following URLs. A simple majority is required for
approval.
http://www1.umn.edu/usenate/ssen/020425stu.html
CAROL WELLS, CLERK
UNIVERSITY
SENATE/
TWIN CITIES CAMPUS ASSEMBLY
DISCUSSION:
With no discussion a vote was taken and the
motion was approved.
APPROVED
5. UNIVERSITY SENATE/TWIN CITIES CAMPUS
ASSEMBLY
BYLAWS AND RULES AMENDMENTS
Information for the
Student Senate
Ryan Osero called the attention of senators to a lengthy list of amendments
to the Constitution, Bylaws, and Rules which will be presented for action at
today’s University Senate meeting. He asked that everyone attend that so
these items can be approved.
6. STATEMENT ON PROPOSED
STADIUM
Information for the Student Senate
COMMENT:
This statement was approved by the Student Senate
Consultative Committee on Thursday, April 5, 2001, was presented at the Board of
Regents meeting on the same date, and was then approved by the Student Senate on
April 19, 2001.
STATEMENT ON THE VIKINGS/GOPHERS STADIUM
PROPOSAL
- Although much of the student body would like the Minnesota Vikings to stay
in Minnesota, the University of Minnesota should focus on its primary mission:
education. A new Vikings/Gophers stadium is not the top priority of the student
body.
- Financial resources provided to University by students and taxpayers must be
directed toward our primary mission: education.
- There must be appropriate consultation with the University community. The
Student Senate Consultative Committee and appropriate campus student assemblies
should be consulted during this process.
- In reviewing this proposal, the University should consider the relationship
of this proposal to its priorities. If those priorities are met, then the
University should consider the following factors in evaluating the stadium
proposal:
- Impact on the campus life of students and how 50,000 or more additional
people on campus will affect the daily lives of students and the community of
which we are a part.
- No student services fees money should be used in connection with a new
stadium
- Replacement of current surface lot parking must occur BEFORE current parking
is lost due to a stadium.
- Parking in newly created ramps should be all-day commuter spots as currently
in place in surface lots.
- Parking rates in these ramps should be affordable for students and not
greatly increased above surface lot rates.
- Campus safety issues surrounding large events like football games.
- The impact a new stadium will have on the leases of buildings, within the
area, that University departments and student organizations currently reside
in.
- No University direct or indirect contribution to capital or infrastructure
costs.
- Stadium activities must be compatible with University operations and values.
7. STUDENT SENATE CHAIR
REPORT
Ryan Osero, Student Senate Chair, welcomed senators to the 2002-03 Student
Senate. He informed senators that Eric Steinhoff, from the Morris campus, is
the Student Senate Vice Chair and Judy Berning, from the Carlson School of
Management, is the Student Senate Consultative Committee (SSCC) Chair. Senators
should feel free to contact any of them with questions or concerns. If senators
cannot attend a meeting, please contact Becky Hippert.
He then
re-emphasized that the Student Senate is only as strong as the involvement of
its members. Senators can be involved by attending meetings or sending an
alternate, be prepared with questions and concerns, talk to your constituents
about issues prior to the meetings, communicate Student Senate actions with the
students assemblies/associations and college boards, serve on a Senate/Assembly
committee, and talk with administrators regarding campus policies and
procedures.
He then thanked all senators who attended the Student Senate
Workshop and Colleen Klatt who facilitated the event.
Issues for the
Student Senate this year will include the presidential search, the Gopher/Viking
stadium proposal, the effects of the full-time policy, financial accountability,
and funding for the state Higher Education Services Office (HESO). If senators
have any other issues, please contact him or a Senate/Assembly
committee.
8. STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE CHAIR
REPORT
Judy Berning, Chair of the Student Senate Consultative Committee (SSCC),
said that issues for the SSCC this year will be the stadium proposal, work study
funding, and accountability. The last issue will involve a joint task force
with the Faculty Consultative Committee and the administration. Financial
accountability will be examined for service units, college reserves, and student
service fees.
9. CAMPUS REPORTS
Crookston – Jean Korkowski said that the Kiehle Building is
scheduled to be finished October 9 and a final design is almost complete for the
Bede Hall renovation.
Duluth – Nick Cecconi stated that new
dormitories, referred to as Griggs Towers, opened on campus this fall, ground
was broken this fall for the Swenson Science Building, updated plans have been
received for the new Recreational Sports Facility, and Kirby Hall renovations
are proceeding as scheduled.
Morris – Kevin Vogeltanz
reported that the campus is trying to rally support again for renovations to the
Social Science Building. Reginald Davis added that Morris is attempting to have
all the gubernatorial candidates visit campus.
Graduate and
Professional Student Association – No report.
Minnesota
Student Association - Judy Berning said that MSA will be sponsoring a float
in the Homecoming parade this year.
10. STUDENT SENATE TASK
FORCE
Action
MOTION:
To approve the charge to the Student Senate
Consultative Committee (SSCC) Membership Task Force
STUDENT SENATE
CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (SSCC) MEMBERSHIP TASK FORCE
1.
OBJECTIVES:
- Define the role of SSCC
- Comment on successes and shortcomings under current structure
- Make recommendations on any needed or suggested changes to the
membership
2. MEMBERSHIP (total of 6)
- A task force chair (who represent either item b, c, or d)
- One person each from student association/assembly
- All members will be selected by the Student Senate Chair and the Student
Senate Consultative Committee Chair
3. TIMELINE
- September 19, 2002 – Approval by SSCC
- September 19 – October 3, 2002 – Selection of task force chair
is made
- October 3, 2002 – Approval by Student Senate
- October 10, 2002 – The rest of task force selection is completed
- November 1, 2002 – The first meeting has been held with a timeline
being drafted
- November 2002 – A report will be given to SSCC and the Student Senate
to monitor progress of the task force
- February 2002 – The task force will submit a final report to SSCC and
the Student Senate.
- March/April 2002 – SSCC and Student Senate will act upon the
findings.
COMMENT:
Questions were raised last
year on the membership of the Student Senate Consultative Committee (SSCC). A
proposal to change the membership was brought forward to the University Senate
but was not approved. The suggestion was then made to appoint a task force to
examine both the role of SSCC and what membership would best serve that
role.
RYAN OSERO, CHAIR
STUDENT
SENATE
DISCUSSION:
Ryan Osero began by making three changes to the
motion. The first is a change to the section on membership so that the Student
Senate Chair and the Student Senate Vice Chair will be finalizing the
membership. The second change is that the motion was presented to SSCC on
September 19 for information, not for approval. The third change is in the
dates for the last two items in the timeline, which should be in 2003, not
2002.
Q: How will students be chosen and do the members need to be
senators?
A: Members do not need to be senators, just a member of each
student association/assembly. The Student Senate Chair and Vice Chair will be
talking to each student association/assembly president for recommendations and
volunteers. The chair, though, will be an at-large member.
Q: Will SSCC
approve the committee membership?
A: Since the charge for the task force
is to examine the current membership structure and how the committee functions,
he did not feel that it was appropriate that SSCC should approve the members.
The task force membership will be shared with the SSCC and the Student Senate
once it has been named, and both groups will receive reports.
With no
further discussion a vote was taken and the motion was approved.
APPROVED
11. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
12. NEW BUSINESS
A senator made a motion that the Statement on the Proposed Stadium,
previously approved by the Student Senate, be re-approved given the current
situation. The motion was seconded and the floor was opened for
discussion.
Q: What is the status of the stadium proposal?
A: Last
spring the state allocated funds to the University for a pre-design on the
stadium and to create a Memorandum of Understanding with the Vikings regarding
what a joint stadium would be and how it would operate. The memorandum is
currently being drafted and will be presented for approval at the December
Regents meeting. The location for the proposed stadium will be the Huron
parking lots.
Q: What would the parking situation be for students and
faculty during construction?
A: Parking during construction has not been
finalized, but the proposal is to use buses to transport people to and from
satellite lots. After construction, there will be two parking ramps, to replace
the lots, at a cost of $60 million and a yearly operating deficit of $3
million.
A senator commented that night class students need access to
affordable parking and all students should not rely on statements that begin
with ‘probably’.
Q: When will a response be received to the
questions and concerns that were submitted by SSCC?
A: There is no
definite date since many of the issues are still unresolved. The expectation is
that more details will become available closer to the December Board of Regents
meeting.
With no further questions, a vote was taken and the motion was
approved.
APPROVED
13. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 1:00 p.m.
Rebecca Hippert
Abstractor