2000-01 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA (No. 4)
STUDENT SENATE MINUTES
APRIL 19,
2001
The fourth meeting of the Student Senate for 2000-01 was convened in 25
Law Building, Minneapolis campus, on Thursday, April 19, 2001, at 11:31 a.m.
Coordinate campuses were linked by telephone. Checking or signing the roll as
present were 22 voting student members. Mr. Percy Chaby
presided.
1. STADIUM DISCUSSION WITH ERIC
KRUSE
Discussion
Eric Kruse, Vice President for University Services on the Twin Cities
Campus, provided a history of the stadium issue. He noted that the University
was approached by the Sports Facilities Commission, who is the landlord of the
Metrodome, and the Vikings this last fall to support their stadium proposals
before the legislature. One proposal was to renovate the Metrodome and the
other was to build a new facility.
The University then examined what it
would need to have a successful Division 1A football program, from which
criteria were created to review each proposal. The Sports Facilities Commission
was notified that the renovated Metrodome plan does not meet the needs of the
University, but that it will honor its obligation through 2011.
The
Vikings would like to work with the University on a joint-use stadium. The
University has noted that the following conditions would need to be met:
on-campus, collegiate look and feel, provide revenue, involve no University debt
service, and cost no more than the Metrodome currently does, which is 10% of
ticket revenue.
The current proposal in the legislature is for a $500
million facility, of which $150 million would be covered by the Vikings and the
NFL. The stadium itself is in the conceptual stage and no long term plans have
been made or agreed upon. There is a bill in the tax committee to form a
commission to deal with financing a new stadium. This commission would have 3
House members, 3 Senate members, 5 members appointed by the Governor, 2 members
from labor, 2 members from business, and 2 members appointed by the Regents.
The bill asks for the members to be appointed by June 15, with a meeting by July
1, and a final report by October 31.
Q: What is the proposed
location?
A: The preferred site is in the Huron Boulevard parking
lots.
Q: With the addition of a stadium on campus, how will parking and
crime be handled?
A: If the Huron Boulevard parking lots are used, 2500
surface spots will be lost. The University has informed the Vikings that before
any stadium construction begins, these spots must be replaced. The proposal is
to create 2 parking ramps, with 4000 spaces, adjacent to the stadium. The
Vikings would receive parking revenue during their 10 home games while the
University would receive the revenue during the rest of the year.
In
terms of the influx of people on campus, the Vikings play a maximum of 13 home
games per year, including post-season play. The Gophers play a maximum of 7
home games per year. These games are mainly on Saturdays and Sundays.
Discussions would need to be held before a Monday or Thursday night game would
be scheduled. Additionally, the Metrodome holds 4 – 5 other major events,
such as concerts, and many minor events, such as high school football or
baseball. Security and safety will need to be built into the stadium design,
but this specific issue has not been addressed yet.
Q: Will there be
student representation on the financial study commission?
A: The Regents
will be allowed 2 representatives, of which they could choose to appoint a
student.
Q: If a stadium close to student housing will not improve the
surrounding area, have other locations been considered?
A: If the
University wants football to return to campus, this is the only location on the
Minneapolis campus big enough to fit a stadium. Sports arenas can spur
development and redevelopment in the surrounding area for dramatic improvements.
A new stadium would create a unique partnership between the University and the
Vikings that does not exist anywhere else.
Q: Why did the University
reject the Metrodome renovation proposal?
A: The University felt that the
Metrodome is a sterile, urban environment without a collegiate feel. It is not
on campus so there is no tie to students and alumni and other campus events
cannot be coordinated with the stadium. The Metrodome proposal was to wrap the
outside of the stadium in electronic boards to identify the event inside. This
change would take place during three football seasons, which would compromise
the environment during construction. The stadium also has a lifespan of 20
years, so there are only 5 – 10 years of use left. University
construction, though, is made to withstand 75 years of use.
Q: There are
two concerns that need to be addressed: parking cost and availability, and how
cost overruns will be addressed during construction. Have these issues been
discussed?
A: Because the stadium will be on University land, which the
University will not sell, the University will control construction, design, and
use. Any costs beyond what is provided must be paid by the Vikings.
With
no further questions, the Student Senate thanked Vice President Kruse for
attending.
3. MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 22, 2001
Action
MOTION:
To approve the Student Senate minutes, which are
available on the Web at the following URLs. A simple majority is required for
approval.
http://www1.umn.edu/usenate/student_senate/010222stu.html
ROBERTA HUMPHREYS, Clerk
UNIVERSITY SENATE/
TWIN CITIES CAMPUS ASSEMBLY
DISCUSSION:
With no discussion, a vote was taken and the
motion was approved.
APPROVED
4. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSES TO STUDENT SENATE
ACTIONS
Information
Resolution on Classroom Upgrades
|
Approved by the: |
Student
Senate February 22, 2001 Administration See Comment* Board of
Regents - no action required |
* The administration has reviewed this
resolution and agrees with the Senate that it is in the best interest of the
University to move as quickly as possible to full implementation of the Twin
Cities Classroom Technology Upgrade Plan developed by the Office of the
Executive Vice President and Provost. The resolution is gratefully accepted
with the understanding that the Plan can only be accelerated if sufficient funds
are provided by the Legislature and/or are available form other non-centrally
budgeted funds. Classroom technology needs are highlighted in the current
biennial budget request submitted to the State. The administration wishes to
note that the Twin Cities collegiate units have already committed funding to
accelerate the Plan at a pace greater than called for in the original
schedule.
Amendments to the Regents Policy on Student Employment at
the University
|
Approved by the: |
Student Senate February 22,
2001 Administration March 29, 2001 Board of Regents - PENDING
APPROVAL at May 11, 2001 meeting |
5. UNIVERSITY SENATE BYLAWS AMENDMENT
Student
Affairs Committee Bylaw Amendment
Information for the Student
Senate
(See Item 19 on the University Senate
docket)
6. STUDENT SENATE CHAIR REPORT
Percy Chaby, Student Senate Chair, reported that he has been working
with the Safety Committee on Campus to have a lighting implementation plan
created.
A new item, to be dealt with more fully next year, is a proposal
to allow students to pay for tuition with credit cards. Visa has approached the
University to start this process. There are many benefits to using credit
cards, but there are also many drawbacks which the Student Senate will need to
review.
7. STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE CHAIR
REPORT
Jason Reed, Student Senate Consultative Committee (SSCC) Chair, said
that SSCC will be appointing students to two search committees that are forming.
The search committees are for the Vice President of Multicultural Affairs,
currently held by Rusty Barcelo, and for the Director of University Libraries,
currently held by Thomas Shaughnessy.
Another issue has been financial
aid. An event will be held on April 27 when the U.S. Department of Education is
on campus to announce that the University is the first school to use
e-signatures to process financial aid applications. Others in attendance will
be Senator Paul Wellstone, Representative Betty McCullum, President Yudof, and
members of the Regents. An e-mail has been sent to students asking for escorts
for the event. Please see Jason Reed if you are interested in serving as an
escort.
SSCC has also reviewed the request from the Student Service Fees
Task Force to create a permanent subcommittee of the Student Affairs Committee
to deal with student service fees issues on a continual basis.
A fourth
item is a statement on the proposed Vikings-Gophers football stadium. This
statement was presented to the Regents on April 5.
Lastly, the amendment
to the Regents Policy on Student Employment, which the Student Senate approved
in February, has been approved by the President and will now be presented to the
Regents for final approval.
8. CAMPUS REPORTS
Crookston – Matt McBlair stated that elections have been
completed. Steve Brandt was elected President, Brent Massmann was elected Vice
Chair, and Matt McBlair will continue as the SSCC representative. A transition
banquet will be held next week.
Duluth - Amber Benning reported
that she will serve as the Legislative Affairs Chair next year and that Kari
Amstutz will continue as UMDSA President.
Morris - Tim Dunn said
that elections have been completed, except for MCSA President since neither
candidate received 50% of the votes. A run-off will be held next
week.
Graduate and Professional Student Association – Paul
Enever noted that GAPSA’s elections are completed and Phillip Cole was
elected as President and Trevor Ewanochko will serve as the SSCC
representative.
Minnesota Student Association – Jason Reed
said that Dan Kelly has been elected MSA President and Nick Dehnert will serve
as the Vice President. SSCC elections will occur on April 24.
9. STUDENT SERVICE FEES TASK FORCE UPDATE
Paul Enever, Student Senate Chair, reported that the initial
recommendations were released Monday and public hearings will be held next week.
The report is also available on-line. The recommendations are from a
system-wide task force as a result of the Supreme Court ruling that student
service fees are constitutional as long as they are distributed in a viewpoint
neutral manner. The task force determined that the University systems fits the
viewpoint neutral definition as long as decisions are based on clear and
objective criteria that are uniformly enforced.
The first recommendation
is for each campus to review their criteria for funding decisions. The second
recommendation is a subcommittee of the Student Affairs Committee to provide
input and oversight on a continuing basis. The subcommittee would be a
standing, versus ad hoc, body which would have the authority to review the fees
process on a system-wide basis and ensure that student, faculty, and staff input
is being heard.
For the Twin Cities Campus, the administrative units
will be separated from the student groups, with each having a separate fees
process. Also, a granting body will be created for non-fees-receiving
organizations. Benefits of this include a less difficult process to receive
fees while encouraging campus programming.
10. STUDENT LEGISLATIVE COALITION UPDATE
Percy Chaby, Student Legislative Coalition (SLC) President, reported
that SLC has been contacting legislators at the capitol and preparing for the
transition meeting tomorrow. He noted that whoever is elected Student Senate
Chair will be expected to attend this meeting.
11. ELECTION OF 2001-02 STUDENT SENATE
CHAIR
Election by 2001-02 Senators Only
Matthew Wohlman, a student senator from the College of Agricultural,
Food, and Environmental Sciences, was elected Student Senate
Chair.
12. ELECTION OF 2001-02 STUDENT SENATE/
STUDENT
SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE VICE CHAIR
Election by 2001-02 Senators
Only
Shawn Lavelle, a student senator from the College of Science and
Engineering at the University of Minnesota Duluth, was elected Student
Senate/Student Senate Consultative Committee Vice Chair.
13. STATEMENT ON PROPOSED STADIUM
Action by the
Student Senate
MOTION:
To approve the following statement.
STATEMENT ON THE VIKINGS/GOPHERS STADIUM
PROPOSAL
By the Student Senate Consultative Committee of the
University of Minnesota Student Senate
- Although much of the student body would like the Minnesota Vikings to stay
in Minnesota, the University of Minnesota should focus on its primary mission:
education. A new Vikings/Gophers stadium is not the top priority of the student
body.
- Financial resources provided to University by students and taxpayers must be
directed toward our primary mission: education.
- There must be appropriate consultation with the University community. The
Student Senate Consultative Committee and appropriate campus student assemblies
should be consulted during this process.
- In reviewing this proposal, the University should consider the relationship
of this proposal to its priorities. If those priorities are met, then the
University should consider the following factors in evaluating the stadium
proposal:
- Impact on the campus life of students and how 50,000 or more additional
people on campus will affect the daily lives of students and the community of
which we are a part.
- No student services fees money should be used in connection with a new
stadium
- Replacement of current surface lot parking must occur BEFORE current parking
is lost due to a stadium.
- Parking in newly created ramps should be all-day commuter spots as currently
in place in surface lots.
- Parking rates in these ramps should be affordable for students and not
greatly increased above surface lot rates.
- Campus safety issues surrounding large events like football games.
- The impact a new stadium will have on the leases of buildings, within the
area, that University departments and student organizations currently reside
in.
- No University direct or indirect contribution to capital or infrastructure
costs.
- Stadium activities must be compatible with University operations and values.
COMMENT:
This statement was approved by the Student Senate
Consultative Committee on Thursday, April 5, 2001, and was then presented at the
Board of Regents meeting on the same date.
JASON REED, Chair
STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE
COMMITTEE
DISCUSSION:
With no comments, a vote was taken and the motion
was approved.
APPROVED
16. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 12:35 p.m.
Rebecca Hippert
Abstractor