2000-01 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA (No. 3)

STUDENT SENATE MINUTES
FEBRUARY 22, 2001, 2000


The third meeting of the Student Senate for 2000-01 was convened in 25 Law Building, Minneapolis campus, on Thursday, February 22, 2001, at 11:32 a.m. Coordinate campuses were linked by telephone. Checking or signing the roll as present were 45 voting student members. Mr. Percy Chaby presided.

1. ANNOUNCEMENTS

A motion was made to reorder the agenda. The motion was seconded and approved.

2. MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 19, 2000 and NOVEMBER 16, 2000
Action

MOTION:

To approve the Student Senate minutes, which are available on the Web at the following URLs. A simple majority is required for approval.

http://www1.umn.edu/usenate/stu_senate/001019stu.html

ROBERTA HUMPHREYS, Clerk
UNIVERSITY SENATE/TWIN CITIES CAMPUS ASSEMBLY

DISCUSSION:

With no discussion, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.

APPROVED

3. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSES TO STUDENT SENATE ACTIONS
Information

Health Plan Task Force Recommendations
Approved by the: Student Senate November 16, 2000
Administration January 19, 2001*
Board of Regents - no action required
*Central Administration has accepted the recommendations of the Health Plan Task Force and has charged a joint faculty/administration task force to carefully review and implement or modify, as appropriate, the recommendations of the Task Force.

2000-01 Student Legislative Coalition Legislative Agenda
Approved by the: Student Senate November 16, 2000
Administration - no action required
Board of Regents - no action required

4. AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIVERSITY SENATE/
TWIN CITIES CAMPUS ASSEMBLY
CONSTITUTION, BYLAWS, AND RULES
Information

Items 10 through 13 from the University Senate agenda are presented here for information and will be presented at the University Senate meeting for action.

5. STUDENT SENATE CHAIR REPORT

Percy Chaby, Student Senate Chair, noted that he has been working on lighting issues for the Twin Cities Campus. Recently, a campus walk-through was held with the Regents and Administrators and now campus lighting standards will be discussed. The hope is for a system-wide plan to be developed with identifiable recurring funding.

Another issue has been lobbying at the state legislature to increase the University's appropriation.

The Senate Student Affairs Committee (SCSA) has also created subcommittees to address issues such as alumni relations and event promotion.

6. STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORT

Jason Reed, Student Senate Consultative Committee (SSCC) Chair, said that today's University Senate agenda contains several constitutional changes that affect students. They include: student term limits on committees, SSCC term limits, student senator term limits, and Student Committee on Committees membership changes. Other issues before the SSCC have been the convening of the Ad Hoc Policy Committee to review each campuses processes for electing their Student Representatives to the Regents, proposing changes to the Regents Policy on Student Employment to make sure that there is a mechanism for student involvement, talking with Vice Provost Craig Swan regarding student evaluations of teaching being placed on-line, looking at the Health Benefits Advisory Committee RFP process to lower health costs while increasing options, and receiving an update from the Office of Financial Aid on their restructuring so that the student voice is heard. Q: How exactly is the Office for Financial Aid being restructured and how can students be involved?

A: The SSCC will hear this report on Thursday, March 1 from 1:30 - 3:00 p.m. in 300 Morrill Hall. Any interested students are welcome to attend.

7. CAMPUS REPORTS


Crookston - Shane Roers noted that over 100 Crookston students recently attended Lobby Day. A student rally was also held this morning to let all students know what they can still do to help. Kiehl Hall renovations are also progressing.

Duluth - Amber Benning reported that UMDSA had 200 students attend Lobby Day and will participate in a food drive in March.

Morris - Tim Dunn said that John Schwaller was recently hired as the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs. Many Morris students also attended the Lobby Day. A RFP has been issued for a new food service contract, so any student input would be appreciated. Twin Cities student senators recommended anyone but ARAMARK since this company makes a profit from the student body.

Graduate and Professional Student Association - Phil Cole noted that GAPSA has several issues that it is working on: shepherding the fees process by working with the fees task force and the waivers working group, double coverage issues for Boynton, feedback on CMU and reporting grades by the registrar, and supporting SLC's efforts and the University's request.

Minnesota Student Association - Ryan Nagle said that MSA has been working on election rules for the All Campus Election Commission, affordable off-campus housing, and Lobby Day.

8. STUDENT SERVICE FEES TASK FORCE UPDATE


Paul Enever, Chair of the Student Service Fees Task Force, said that three working groups have been formed to address administrative unit issues, student group issues, and more access to fees money by student groups. The Task Force has also recommended that the administrative units be separated from the student groups in terms of fees processes. Another possible recommendation is to create a Senate subcommittee to provide input into the fees process. This subcommittee would include faculty and students to provide input on policies and procedures to allow for a unified campus-wide approach. A report should be issued next month.

9. STUDENT LEGISLATIVE COALITION (SLC) UPDATE


Percy Chaby reported that Lobby Day was held, and while the coordinate campus turn-out was great, there was poor representation from the Twin Cities. Of the 300 Twin Cities students who signed up, only 30 attended the event. In comparison, there were almost 800 coordinate campus students present. SCL will hold more rallies on the Twin Cities campus and encourage students to write letters and e-mails, and call their representatives.

SLC is also proposing a tax bill to remove sales tax from anything that students buy that educationally-related, whereas now tax is only removed for books.

10. CLASSROOM ADVISORY SUBCOMMITTEE
Resolution on Classroom Upgrades
Action

RESOLUTION ON CLASSROOM UPGRADES

Whereas centrally scheduled classrooms are an institutional priority,

Whereas the Twin Cities General Purpose Classroom Technology Upgrade Plan is a comprehensive multi-year plan that addresses critically needed teaching and learning requirements in classrooms,

Whereas implementation of this plan, to date, has made a significant difference in meeting the needs of faculty and the expectations of students,

Whereas this plan must be accelerated to provide a strong classroom environment that will put University of Minnesota teaching and learning at a level required in a premier university, therefore,

Be it resolved that to do this, priority must be given to increased and recurring funding for the Plan.

COMMENTS:

This resolution was approved by the Classroom Advisory Subcommittee and is being presented to other campus groups for their endorsement.

PERCY CHABY, member
CLASSROOM ADVISORY SUBCOMMITTEE

DISCUSSION:

With no discussion, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.

APPROVED

11. STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
Amendments to the Regents Policy on Student Employment at the University
Action

STUDENT EMPLOYMENT AT THE UNIVERSITY

...

Section II. Student Employment Committees.

...

Subd. 2. Powers and Duties.

(a) Review, conduct public hearings on, and present recommendations to the regents, president, vice presidents, chancellors, vice chancellors, and the Student Senate Consultative Committee with respect to the rules which govern student employment on each respective campus.

...

(c) Make investigations concerning the administration of student employment either at the request of the regents, the president, vice presidents, chancellors, vice chancellors, the Student Senate Consultative Committee, or the person designated to be responsible for student employment or on its own initiative.

(d) Perform such other duties as may be assigned to it by the regents, president, vice presidents, chancellors, vice chancellors, or the Student Senate Consultative Committee.

...

COMMENT:

Currently the Student Employment Committees are autonomous from student governance. This amendment corrects this problem by ensuring that the Student Senate is more involved with employment of students.

JASON REED, Chair
STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE

DISCUSSION:

Jason Reed, Chair of the Student Senate Consultative Committee (SSCC), stated that once this amendment has been approved, it will be forwarded to the President and the Board of Regents for approval.

With no discussion, a vote was taken and the motion was approved.

APPROVED

12. BUDGET DISCUSSION WITH RICHARD PFUTZENREUTER
Discussion

Richard Pfutzenreuter, Chief Financial Office and Treasurer for the University, said that Governor has appropriated $56 million of the University's $221 million request. A new state revenue forecast will be available next week, but the indication is that the state's revenues will be down up to $500 million dollars. This is more stress on all groups to secure additional funding since the legislature uses this forecast to decide on state spending and tax relief. There have also been rumors that the Governor may decide to change his budget based on the new forecast.

As for the House and Senate, each body will develop its own budget by the end of March. Then these bills will be sent to conference committee to develop final figures. The University will not know its appropriation until the conference committee finishes. According to the state constitution, the conference committee must complete its work by the third Monday in May following the first Saturday, which this year is May 21. All completed bills are then sent to the Governor for his signature. Budget decisions will be presented to the Regents in June for review and approval.

The University's situation this year is unique because of the Governor's low appropriation in the face of several high unusual costs, such as health care and the Medical School. If the University only receives $56 million, the University will need to raise tuition 14% for two years or cut budgets 6% for two years. These are the two extremes, so any proposal would likely fall somewhere in the middle.

The goal is to increase the appropriation, although it will be a struggle to double the Governor's appropriation. Current indications are that the House will only add $14-15 million and that the Senate will be higher.

Q: What happens if the legislature approves $100-150 million but the Governor vetoes this figure?

A: Many people are worried about this situation, but legislators are under pressure from their constituents to fund higher education. There would likely be enough votes on this issue to override the Governor's veto. Spending bills need to reach the Governor, though, before the legislature adjourns otherwise there is not an opportunity to override the veto.

Q: Is there a magic number that the University needs to receive to avoid double digit tuition increases?

A: There is no firm number, and he cannot speak for the President or the Board of Regents, but it would be hard to recommend back-to-back double digit tuition increases if the Governor's appropriation was doubled.

Q: Is there any chance for only an inflationary increase in tuition?

A: There is probably no chance that a tuition increase would stay at 3%.

Q: What will be the cuts in departments that will accompany tuition increases?

A: There are no precise figures on a combination of tuition increases and department cuts. The only certain figures are when each occurs separately.

Q: What can students do to help this situation?

A: Students need to keep in touch with the President and Board of Regents, but the most important thing is to contact your legislators since they are convinced that students elected Jesse Ventura. Students need to mobilize and make their voices heard that you do not agree with the Governor's proposal.

Q: SLC has been encouraging students to send postcards. Is there anything else that students should be doing?

A: There are four more weeks to influence legislators before the budget targets are set. The biggest influence for legislators in all districts is phone calls from students and parents. Students should also contact leaders in the House and Senate as well as moderate conservatives in the House since they have deciding cotes. Some legislators, such as Phyllis Kahn, already support the University's request.

Q: In light of budget cuts, have solicitations been made for private sector funding support?

A: There is a strong relationship between poor appropriations and a backlash against the University from private donations since private donors do not want to see their money substituting for state support.

Q: If the Governor vetoes the budget after the legislature adjourns, then what is the University's appropriation?

A: In addition to the University's appropriation, the University also receives another $600 million from the state. If a budget is not approved by July 1, the start of the next budget year, the University will be short the appropriation plus $600 million. There are policies in place to reduce costs in fiscal emergencies, but the University would like to avoid this situation.

Q: What is the President and the administration doing to help students?

A: The President has been flying around the state to promote the University's request. Administrators are talking with business groups, rotaries, and lions clubs and sending letters to the editors of the newspapers.

13. OLD BUSINESS

NONE

14. NEW BUSINESS

NONE

15. ADJOURNMENT

The meeting was adjourned at 3:54 p.m.

Rebecca Hippert
Abstractor