[In these minutes: Reports, Student Committee on Committees change, Student
Representatives on Committees, Roles and Responsibilities
Statement]
STUDENT SENATE CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (SSCC)
MINUTES
APRIL 4, 2002
[These minutes reflect discussion
and debate at a committee of the University of Minnesota Senate or Twin Cities
Campus Assembly; none of the comments, conclusions, or actions reported in these
minutes represent the views of, nor are they binding on, the Senate or Assembly,
the Administration, or the Board of Regents.]
PRESENT: Khaled
Dajani (chair), Judy Berning, Ryan Brux, Anthony Heryla, Kari Lindeman, Matt
McBlair, Jason Stingl.
REGRETS: Nick Cecconi, Trevor Ewanochko,
Scott Ferguson, Christina Frazier, Shawn Lavelle, Ryan
Osero.
GUESTS: Yev Garif.
1. REPORTS
SSCC
Chair
Khaled Dajani reported that the withdrawal issue will be discussed
again by SCEP, with a potential policy at the April Senate meeting. He said
that the 13 credit minimum will be implemented for the Twin Cities. The Council
of Undergraduate Deans (CUD) has put together an implementation team. The
student representatives are Venora Hung, Josh LaBau, and Brian Wiedenmeier. The
policy will only affect freshmen and transfer students next fall. Tuition
banding will also be implemented to compliment the 13 credit minimum.
The
registration queue is also changing for the Twin Cities campus. It will be
phased-in, starting with Spring 2003 registration. The new queue will make a
distinction by credits earned and by full-time/part-time status. He noted that
new student senators will be sent an e-mail regarding the early registration
option available through the University Senate.
Khaled Dajani then said
that the stadium issue is still active. He is meeting with Vice President
Pfutzenreuter next week and invited other SSCC members to attend if they were
interested. He then asked members to read the stadium statement that SSCC and
the Student Senate approved last spring, which list many conditions that would
need to be met before students would support a joint-use on-campus
stadium.
He then reminded SSCC members that the Research Committee would
be discussing the issue of increased student members at their next meeting.
SSCC members are invited to attend if they are interested.
Lastly he said
that Dan Kelly, MSA President, has raised a question regarding SSCC
members’ terms on SSCC. He sent an e-mail that these students would
complete their service on April 14 and new members would be elected April 15.
Becky Hippert wrote a response back that Senate terms run through June 30, but
the issue is not resolved. If needed, the Senate Parliamentarian will be asked
to make a ruling. All members will be kept informed of the progress on this
issue.
Crookston
Matt McBlair said that interviews for CSA
positions were conducted last Monday and all positions except for the Student
Representative to the Regent was appointed. Nate Fahey was appointed as the
SSCC representative for next year. The CSA President and Vice President will be
decided next week.
GAPSA
Yev Garif said that last week was
graduate and professional student appreciation week for the state as declared by
Governor Ventura last year. Cake and ice cream were served one day along with
other events during the week. He noted that GAPSA supports the revised SSCC
membership so that it would have two representatives each year, instead of the
rotating system which is now in place. Last week, he and Tom Walsh were elected
the two new SSCC representatives. Lastly he noted that the housing survey is
continuing.
MSA
Anthony Heryla reported that elections were
recently completed and Joshua Colburn and Eric Dyer were elected MSA President
and Vice President. The other issue for MSA is a late night bus to bring
students around campus until 2 a.m. MSA will also be completing a website with
information on local landlords. The website will debut during Spring Jam. The
Crookston 10% Society recently visited campus to see how the QSCC here interacts
with student governance. It was a positive experience for both
organizations.
Morris
Ryan Brux reported that Reid LeBeau
finally received an answer from President Yudof on where the University fee
money is spent. The explanation is that the tax base is not high enough at some
campuses to pay for projects, new departments, and new admissions procedures.
Therefore, central administration needs to be able to provide funding to some
projects. The only way for central to receive funds is through this University
fee. In reality, it means that all students are supporting all projects, not
just those on their own campus. Reid expressed the need to have this fee
included in tuition so that students can receive loans for it.
Khaled
Dajani said that this fee will never become part of tuition because then central
administration will not receive it. Through the University’s funding
structure, IMG, tuition goes directly to the colleges without first going to
central administration. Colleges and departments already pay a tax on IMG
funding, but they would not want a higher tax rate. This is why the fee was
instituted. It is also easier for central administration to raise a fee than
tuition.
Ryan Brux then said that Morris is considering moving from
Division II to Division III athletics since it has not won a game in almost five
years. Chancellor Shuman is talking to all campus groups before he makes a
decision. If the change is made it could hurt campus diversity since many
minority students come to Morris so that they can participate in Division II
athletics. If Morris switches to Division III, some students may leave and
recruiting efforts many decrease.
Another issue is that the Vice
Chancellor for Finance is an interim appointment. The Chancellor is considering
whether it should be permanent but the person in the position only holds an
associate degree. MCSA will be involved in the final
decision.
Applications for the SSCC position are due tomorrow and
interviews will be conducted next week. All elections this year are uncontested
and only one student senator positions has been filled, so MCSA is dealing with
the issue of campus apathy.
He thanked the administration for selecting a
Morris student to serve on the University Services Vice President search
committee.
Lastly, he asked SSCC members to convince the President to
visit Morris in September rather than August since students will not be on
campus if he comes in August.
SCEP
Scott Ferguson sent the
following written report:
SCEP has recently talking about calendar conflicts
because in 2004 and on, the University has some conflicts with getting in enough
instruction days before Christmas. SCEP is considering starting classes before
Labor Day, even with the state fair. Also, Martin Sampson has been chosen as
chair for next year. W's will be returning to SCEP with a proposal that a
student can drop any class s/he wants the first 3 weeks, and then s/he has to
get permission. There is also a proposal that student athletes can only miss
finals for a tournament or conference championship
event.
SCSA
Jason Stingl said that the SCSA discussed the
withdrawal issue at its last meeting. Tina Falkner from the Office of the
Registrar brought figures on how many withdrawals occur in weeks three through
eight. There are 500-700 withdrawals each week from three through seven, with
another 1400 during the eighth week. SCEP has created a subcommittee to look
into withdrawals, but the only student on the subcommittee is a graduate
student. An undergraduate voice is needed since this is the group which will be
affected.
The proposed policy is no withdrawals after the second week
unless they are approved by the college scholastic committee. SCSA felt that
this withdrawal policy was a band-aid to a much bigger problem. Many classes do
not have graded assignments or mid-terms until later in the terms, and some
classes have a final exam that is over 50% of the final grade. Many colleges
might also not be able to handle the added administration for hundreds of
withdrawals each semester. These issues need to be addressed before a
withdrawal policy is put into place.
A committee member said that
students will already be punished for taking less than 13 credits by paying
more. Making withdrawing harder is too much at once, especially considering
that the University’s current policy is consistent with other
institutions.
It is not known whether this policy would apply to the
coordinate campuses as well.
It was noted that Morris students can
currently withdraw up to the tenth week without permission.
Q: How many
students drop one class but add another at the same time?
A: Tina Falkner
did not have that information.
A proposed policy has been drafted
already, which will be forwarded to the committee. SCEP meets next week at 1
p.m. to address this issue. Jason Stingl said that he and Brittny McCarthy
Barnes already plan on attending, but other interested students are
welcome.
The other issue SCSA looked at this year was tuition payment by
credit card. If the University were to accept credit cards, it would be a big
cost to shoulder, on top of rising tuition and fees. Ed Ehlinger, Director of
Boynton Health Services, said that debt counseling services are in demand on
campus and many students carry over $3000 of debt. SCSA discussed a report
saying the credit card payment should not be instituted and listed several
alternatives for students, such as loans. The problem is that many students do
not qualify for loans or grants when their parents’ income is included,
but students are not considered independent until they are 25 years old. There
are other options to find money, but students need to be aware of where to find
these resources.
2. STUDENT COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES
CHANGE
Khaled Dajani said that there is no provision in the current
Bylaws to fill mid-year vacancies on the Student Committee on Committees. This
amendment will allow vacancies to be filled. A motion was approved to place
this amendment on the April University Senate agenda for approval.
3.
STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES ON COMMITTEES
At the March Senate meeting, a
motion was made to allow more academic professionals to serve on committees, as
well as designating seats for them on Senate/Assembly committees. The changes
to add academic professional seats though, did not decrease the number of
faculty on committees. Therefore, to make sure that the student voice is not
diminished, a similar increase in student positions is being considered. He
distributed a list detailing how many positions were added to each
committee.
Members made the following comments:
- Students should push for more representatives
- Decision cannot be reached today at the meeting
Q: Why
wasn’t this task given to the Student Committee on Committees (C on
C)?
A: Currently, the Student C on C does not have any members from
Crookston, Duluth, or GAPSA, so it was felt that SSCC was a more representative
body at this time.
It was decided that Khaled Dajani and Yev Garif would
review the information and make recommendations. The recommendations would then
be voted on by e-mail so that the changes can be included on the April Senate
agenda.
4. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES STATEMENT
Committee
members read the statement and made the following comments:
- Committee represents students at large
- SSCC needs to think of different aspects to make sure that represented
groups’ voices are heard
- Members are representatives for their constituency, but who are concerned
with all students
- When votes are taken, members must vote for what is best for the entire
University
- Distinction between what association/assembly says and what college
says
- Are members completely beholden to their representative body?
- Members should present concerns to SSCC from their association/assembly
- There must be a unified front for the students
- Members are here to represent all students
- The benefits to one person or organization does not supercede the benefits
to the University as a whole
- What about other student views?
- Members need to represent all the students at their campuses
- Personal agendas need to be eliminated
- SSCC is open to ideas and opinions since other organizations can add
insight
Q: What if there is a concern but the president asks
the member not to say anything?
A: Members should feel free to still
state those concerns.
It was decided that these comments would be taken
into consideration and a revised statement would be brought back on May
2
With no other business, Khaled Dajani thanked all members for attending
and adjourned the meeting.
Becky Hippert
University Senate