|
Approved by the:
|
University Senate - December 6, 2001
Administration - no action required
Board of Regents - no action required
|
STATEMENT REGARDING GENERAL PURPOSE CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE PLAN
Statement regarding General Purpose Classroom Technology
Upgrade Plan
Adopted November 13, 2001
The Senate Committee on Finance and Planning reiterates its strong
support for assigning a high institutional priority to providing funding for the
“General Purpose Classroom Technology Upgrade Plan”
The
Committee views the lack of sufficient technology equipped general purpose
classrooms with great concern. We note that the faculty’s needs for
projection-capable Internet connected general classrooms far outstrip supply.
Likewise, matriculating students are increasingly used to experiencing
technology in classrooms in their K –12 education. They bring high
expectations to the University of Minnesota, and we need to measure
up.
The Committee has closely followed the “General Purpose
Classroom Upgrade Plan” since its inception, and is on the record as
endorsing the plan and recommending accelerated implementation. We also note
that the Classroom Advisory Subcommittee as well as numerous governance,
faculty, and student committees and groups have favorably endorsed the Tech
Upgrade plan. All agree that this plan provides the critically important
baseline level of classroom technology, and the foundation for future technology
enhancements. The $7M, multi-year, phased plan began in FY- 00 and is scheduled
to be complete at the end of FY- 04.
The Senate Committee on Finance and
Planning particularly notes that the Tech Upgrade plan identifies recurring
funding requirements for life-cycle maintenance, equipment replacement, and
support staffing as elements of the basic plan. We support this up-front
identification of life-cycle costs as a fiscally prudent approach to upgrading
classroom technology infrastructure.
We note with great concern that the
tech upgrade work to date has been funded only with one-time funds. The
recurring life cycle costs for technology-enhanced classrooms has not been
funded. We are, however, accruing these costs. Given the importance of general
classrooms and their technology infrastructure, we cannot continue to defer
these costs without jeopardizing our teaching and learning mission.
The
committee applauds the completion of 65 tech upgrade installations by the start
of the Fall 2001 semester. We note however, that the plan called for completion
of 146 rooms by this time. Funding shortfalls have caused the U to fall behind
the Tech Upgrade Plan’s timetable of completing 300 classrooms by end
FY-04.
The Senate Committee on Finance and Planning strongly supports
and urges funding of the General Purpose Classroom Tech Upgrade Plan, and its
counterparts on the coordinate campuses, to complete, on schedule, the funding
of recurring life-cycle classroom costs as well the establishment of a stable
recurring funding stream for general purpose classrooms.