Responses of the Regents Candidates to Questions from the
University of Minnesota Faculty Senate Consultative Committee
District 2
Dallas Bohnsack
What do you perceive as the roles of the University of Minnesota in the state,
national, and international contexts?
The University of Minnesotaâs tripartite mission of teaching and learning;
research and discovery; and outreach and public service are its roles in the
state, national, and international context. These essential, universal
principles secure a fundamental and continual University presence throughout the
local, regional, and global theaters.
Teaching and learning. Throughout the past century, the University of Minnesota
has helped guide, cultivate, and enrich the lives of millions of individuals _
individuals who, in turn, guide, cultivate, and enrich the worlds in which they
live. Furthermore, the University itself is an entity that has been made
richer, more substantive, more effective, and more reflective of the global
context by the very elements of diversity of opinion, divergence of background,
and variation of experience brought by students and instructors alike.
Research and discovery. The relevance, significance, and utility of the
University environment is not limited to those who directly experience it though
formal participation. Long acknowledged as a world-class institution, the
theoretical and applied research germinated through the University of Minnesota
has helped accomplish everything from developing more efficient, effective
techniques for measuring public opinion to healing those suffering from illness
long thought to be incurable. The implications of the Universityâs research
stretch from the house on the corner to the farthest reaches of Antarctica _ and
beyond.
Outreach and public service. From childcare to construction, from immunizations
to animal husbandry, the meaning, importance, and manifold function of the
University of Minnesota is extended each and every day through various channels
of outreach and service. Through its efforts, the "U" is not merely an abstract
entity of academic pursuit, it is a conduit to and from communities throughout
our state, throughout our nation, and throughout the world. Indeed, I firmly
believe that the Universityâs flourishing and widely-known Extension program
could be even further integrated into the community context through a presence
in virtually every department in the University system. For example, an on-site
Extension educator placed within the department of Engineering could be used as
an invaluable conduit between the department and the communities who may benefit
from cutting-edge research.
What strengths would you bring to the University and the Board of Regents? How
would your service as a Regent enhance the quality of the University of
Minnesota?
As I prepared to formally apply for the position of Regent, I naturally pondered
the appropriateness and relevance of my credentials and experience. Through
this process, I was struck by the parallels between the role of Regent and the
nature of a County Commissioner; Iâve had the privilege of serving the citizens
of Scott County on the Board of Commissioners for a total of eight years. Like
the Board of Regents, the County Board of Commissioners is a policymaking entity
that flourishes or fails upon the vision, leadership, effective collaboration,
and individual integrity of its members. Like the Board of Regents, complete
unanimity of opinion and perspective is rare; however, through healthy and
respectful dialogue, through the synthesis and analysis of responsible
information, and through the collegial guidance of the individual members, the
best decision can be reached. I am firmly committed to the process of
reflective leadership and respectful fairness.
My years with my colleagues on the Scott County Board of Commissioners have been
distinguished by this particular "consensus building" approach, and I would
relish the opportunity to contribute to the Board of Regents in this manner. A
united vision is, indeed, strengthened by the characteristics of diversification
and decentralization. Much like the principles espoused by James Madison, I
firmly believe that blind deference to complete unanimity is less a virtue than
an affliction. However, importantly, dissonance and dissention need not be the
only alternative; principled leadership and restrained guidance are absolutely
critical in the policymaking process.
I do not purport to have pat solutions and ready answers for the future of the
University of Minnesota. My vision for the Board of Regents for the University
of Minnesota is a shared vision: to strengthen it by increasing its visibility,
relevance, accessibility, and applicability in multiple arenas; to help guide it
successfully into the next millennium by meeting the challenges and needs of a
growing and diversifying population; and to fulfill the mission statement.
What does shared governance mean to you? What role would you take as a Regent
in the shared governance process?
In short, the concept of "shared governance" is one of shared responsibility,
shared authority, and shared accountability. Given its stature, function, and
mission, the authority and responsibility of the University of Minnesota is
uniquely shared among many axes: for example, all Regents must work in concert
with each other with a clarity of vision and purpose, with a dedication to a
fair and balanced process, to further the objectives, goals, and principles of
the mission statement. However, the Board is not the sole locus of University
authority and responsibility; indeed, from the Minnesota Legislature to the
President, from the Board to the faculty, the practical application of the
concept of "shared governance" is absolutely critical to the vitality of this
great institution.
As Iâve indicated above, I am not only comfortable with the dynamic and
progressive process of shared governance, I am a proponent of it.
Rholan E. Larson
What do you perceive as the roles of the University of Minnesota in the state,
national and international contexts?
The three-fold mission of the University focuses on education, research and the
public interest.
In fulfilling the first two (education and research), the faculty is the
critical component. Emphasis on research is one of the factors that enhances
the entire quality of the Universityâs many activities.
Research not only brings a greater depth of understanding to the faculty members
involved in research (and, therefore, a deeper quality of education for the
students) but also places the University on the cutting edge nationally and
internationally. This depth of knowledge also impacts the ratings of the
University compared with other institutions of higher learning. Those ratings
are significant factors in attracting competent faculty and in the respect this
institution commands in the academic community.
Public interest is also a part of the mission. In this role, the University
provides many services for the citizens of Minnesota. Developing improved
methods of communicating those opportunities and resources to the citizens of
our state must be a goal. The public interest activities of the University also
have an impact beyond the borders of the state.
What strengths would you bring to the University and the Board of Regents? How
would your service as a Regent enhance the quality of the University of
Minnesota?
While practicing my career as a Certified Public Accountant, I have held
leadership positions in many organizations in and beyond the accounting
profession. Those involvements provide an excellent background for serving as a
Regent.
I have great respect for the University of Minnesota and welcome the opportunity
to contribute as a member of the Board of Regents. I am a graduate of the
University and have had ongoing involvements. For example, I served as a member
of the University of Minnesota Advisory Council--Accounting Department. Also,
our firm recruits regularly on campus. Many of our personnel are graduates of
the University.
Some of the strengths I will bring to the Board of Regents include the
following:
¬ Proven leadership ability
¬ Willingness to express views on an issue, while listening to the views of
others
¬ Visionary
¬ Communication skills
¬ Facilitator and consensus builder
¬ Negotiator
¬ Knowledgeable about fiscal matters (finance, budgetary controls, etc.)
I will be an effective spokesman for the University. I will support efforts to
enhance the NRC ratings. I will also support efforts to improve the
effectiveness, relevance and access regarding the many activities which benefit
the citizens of Minnesota (public interest).
What does shared governance mean to you? What role would you take as a Regent
in the shared governance process?
The Board of Regents has the responsibility for governing the University. It
must approve major policies and monitor the effectiveness of the overall
operation.
For example, the faculty must have the primary responsibility for curriculum
within the various academic programs. The Boardâs role is to delegate clearly
and totally that responsibility while expecting accountability for results. The
Board has responsibility to confront any major issues which may surface out of
that process. In this example, the appropriate faculty group has primary
responsibility but should surface major issues which they believe should come to
the attention of the Board of Regents. In this way, governance must be shared
with other groups within the University. In effect, the Board delegates primary
responsibility.
Further, in this example, by placing the responsibility completely on the
appropriate faculty groups (subject only to Board oversight), we will be able to
compete more effectively on a national basis with other institutions of higher
learning.
As a Regent, I will support the concept of the Board remaining above the details
of this process while being involved in major policy decisions, monitoring
effectiveness of the programs and dealing with major issues brought to the
attention of the Board.
District 3
Richard Clarke
What do you perceive as the roles of the University of Minnesota in the state,
national and international contexts?
The University, as a land grant institution, has a multifaceted and complex
mission for research, teaching and outreach. The world is at a hinge of history
and the changes we experience will be profound. The University needs to evolve
and change as we enter the Information Age. The advance of technology around the
world will continue, probably at an ever-increasing rate, and our graduates from
all colleges will be expected to have new knowledge and skills to be effective
in the workplace and the world at home and abroad.
We need to continue to recognize how new technology will change our society and
our educational system. We donât know what challenges the 21st Century will
bring, therefore the University needs a balanced, forward looking program so
that Minnesota will not be caught reacting to events, but will play a proactive
role in shaping the next century.
The University needs to constantly reinforce its image not only as a world class
research University, but also as a prime contributor to the high quality of life
that Minnesotans enjoy. The achievements of the University have a profound
effect on the economy of Minnesota and the nation in ways that are neither
generally recognized nor appreciated by some segments of the state population.
What strengths would you bring to the University and to the Board of Regents?
How would your service as a Regent enhance the quality of the University of
Minnesota?
Three of my key areas of competence are technological, entrepreneurial and
international expertise. I have worked for Minnesota based entrepreneurial,
technological firms for my entire business career. I first started in the
computer industry at Univac in 1956 and have been associated with the industry
as it evolved in accordance with Moorâs Law (which states that the user gets
twice the performance for the same price in computer hardware every 18 months).
In looking forward, we see no "knee" in the cost/performance curve over the next
20 years. I understand where this technology is taking us and how the University
must change and evolve to meet the needs of our students and citizens. These
technological advances will affect not only business and industry, but will also
have a profound impact on society as a whole, on communities, families and
individuals, as we wrestle with the implications and ethics of the new
possibilities the technology presents. The geographic areas that learn to master
the use of the machines and to develop the complex algorithms required by
different applications will become winners in the Information Age.
I have worked for entrepreneurial firms throughout my entire business career. I
have a strong understanding of the magic mix of "money at risk and doers at
work" that is vital in the job creation process. The University plays a
significant role in training workers to staff the future needs of all
enterprises so important to the economy and overall well being of Minnesota as
we enter the Information Age.
I have experience working with complex social and technical systems. I have
traveled extensively throughout the world and have directly supervised employees
in West Berlin, Turin, Paris, UK, Sweden, Korea and Japan. I was directly
responsible for opening the China market for MTS Systems Corporation and opened
offices in Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai. These experiences give me a
worldwide perspective and a strong appreciation for cultural differences.
What does shared governance mean to you? What role would you take as a Regent in
the shared governance process?
Shared governance means three things to me:
¬ Clear lines of responsibility
¬ Knowledge of the various governance bodies with which the Board of Regents
interacts
¬ Balanced and respectful interaction with those bodies with support where
appropriate.
My understanding of the role of the Board of Regents is that the Board, in close
cooperation with the President, sets policy and direction for the University.
The Board then monitors and assesses the degree to which the policy
implementation is effective. This needs to be an ongoing, cooperative effort of
regular review of policy and modification, if appropriate. There is no place for
micromanagement of the University by the Board of Regents.
If a faculty member, department or delegation were to approach me with
information or request, my job would be to consider that information in light of
the policies set by the Board and to ascertain whether I think the policies are
clear, appropriate and fair. If I think they are not, I would present that
information to the Board and request that action be taken to clarify the
position of the Board.
District 8
Fred Friedman
1. What do you perceive as the roles of the University of Minnesota in the
state, national, and international contexts?
State - The University of Minnesota is our flagship University and should be the
leading institution and more importantly, the number one resource of the State
of Minnesota. Citizens of Minnesota should regard the U as their university,
their leading research institution, where they go for assistance in medical,
scientific, technical, and cultural areas. It should be in the forefront in
issues of diversity and it should stand for excellence. People should not only
be proud of our University but proud to have graduated from it and proud to send
their children there for both undergraduate and graduate studies.
National - Our university should be a national leader in a broad range of areas.
It should have the goal of being a top university in academic areas across the
board. It should maintain a national reputation and recruit nationally for
faculty and students. When it excels in an area, the entire university
community, other disciplines, other departments and co-curricular activities all
benefit. When it is mediocre in a subject, other areas are tarnished. There is
no reason the University should not compete for students, faculty, and research
grants on a national basis. When the University of Minnesota succeeds, it is to
our credit. When the University of Minnesota fails to succeed, it is a
criticism of the State.
International - Not only is the world shrinking in a business and communication
sense, but in an educational sense as well. The more diverse a university's
faculty and student body, the stronger the university is. The University of
Minnesota has always had a strong international flavor and that needs to
continue. The fact that we are in a large city with a large international
airport with many international corporations should be used to our advantage.
Minnesota has been internationally known for innovations in its iron ore,
timber, and medical industries. It should also be known for the University of
Minnesota. People should be proud to wear apparel that says University of
Minnesota whether they are in St. Paul, Minneapolis, Cloquet, Chicago, or
Singapore.
2. What strengths would you bring to the University and to the Board of
Regents? How would you service as a Regent enhance the quality of the
University of Minnesota?
I am an alumnus with two degrees and a graduate of two campuses of the
University of Minnesota. I have worked part-time for the University of
Minnesota Duluth as an assistant professor teaching four classes a year since
1975. I have worked on alumni affairs and University committees; I am a former
student body president and I am an attorney with 46 employees, who are
responsible for a public budget.
I regularly work with committees, governing boards, the Legislature and groups
of diverse people with diverse interests. I know what it means to build
consensus and I believe I have an excellent understanding of the difference
between policy decisions and management decisions.
My experiences as a student leader, alumni, faculty member, and an attorney with
dozens of boards and governing bodies and substantial interaction with the
Legislature has certainly trained me to advocate for the University. I believe
very strongly in the University of Minnesota, and I also believe I can
contribute to further strengthening the University community, especially in
Greater Minnesota.
3. What does shared governance mean to you? What role would you take as a
Regent in the shared governance process?
Shared government means that decisions are to be made by the faculty, students,
civil service staff, and administration of the University of Minnesota. Faculty
and students should participate in the hiring, promotion, and firing of
employees. Faculty and students should also participate in the setting of
budgets and in both short and long range planning.
Broad policy decisions and the hiring of the administration should be made by
the Board of Regents with significant input from all of the above mentioned
groups. I think there should be a clear distinction between making policy and
carrying out that policy or administering the University. The Board of Regents
should be careful not to involve themselves in management, micro-management, or
in the daily operation of the University. On the other hand, they should set
policy after careful and thorough consultation with the president, as well as
others, and serve as representatives of the people of the State of Minnesota.
Regents should always be promoting the University, the University community, and
asking the community what can be done to make the University even stronger.
I would participate in setting policy within the Board of Regents structure and
the Regents committee structure. I would enthusiastically participate in the
University and the University community, be a careful listener and an
enthusiastic and zealous advocate for the University and especially its
students. I would do everything I could to demand academic excellence and the
excellence of character of employees and students of the University. I believe
in a University of Minnesota that is demanding, a state resource and a national
and international leader while at the same time being accessible and personable.
I want to advocate for a University that people look forward to attending, and
are proud that they attended. In short, I would promote academic excellence,
community pride, and leadership of the University throughout the State.
Frances Gardeski
What do you perceive as the roles of the University of Minnesota in the state,
national and international contexts?
The role of the University needs to be that of a leader in higher education in
the State, national and international contexts. The University exists for the
populace and emphasis needs to be kept on that. The University needs to have a
visionary role and to compete on the state and national level. We need to assure
opportunity and diversity. We need to further reach minorities in our state.
Undergraduate education is important on a state and national level. We must
continue to improve and maintain the University as a premier institution so we
can draw students not only on a national level, but an international level as
well.
What strengths would you bring to the University and to the Board of Regents?
How would your service as a Regent enhance the quality of the University of
Minnesota?
I have strong visionary and leadership skills as evidenced by my accomplishments
in my recent position. I have strong financial skills. I was responsible for a
$23 million budget, the formation of 2 major affiliations and various building
projects. I understand interest-based bargaining and can work with a diverse
number of factions and bring them together to reach consensus. I understand
systems and have problem-solving skills. I have been on boards as well as worked
for governing boards.
What does shared governance mean to you? What role would you take as a Regent in
the shared governance process?
In shared governance, diverse entities have a stake in, and share responsibility
for an organization or a systemâs success. Each entity has the responsibility to
probe, listen, problem-solve and reach agreement on issues. The decision is then
supported by all. The role of the Regent is to assure the credibility of the
process.
At-Large
David Johnson
What do you perceive as the roles of the University of Minnesota in the state,
national and international contexts?
I would encourage the University to take leadership in encouraging greater
communication between the sectors of higher education in the state. The Board
of Regents, for example, could initiate contact with other governing boards. I
believe that the private colleges and MnSCU look to the University for
leadership in this regard. The agenda is formidable: financial aid allocation,
relationship of UMTC to Metro State to the metropolitan area community and
technical colleges, joint initiatives in technology. At the regional level, I
would urge UM to seize opportunities for cooperation with our counterpart
institutions. One good model is the Kellogg Foundation's Vision for Change
project, a platform for creating contact for faculty and students from UM, NDSU
and SDSU. The cooperation with UW Madison in parceling out expensive advanced
degree programs, e.g., library science, is another. UM also needs to solidify
its position in the top ranks of research universities. It should be the
nation's leading public urban university which combines research and land-grant
missions. The Morris Campus needs to lead in the public liberal arts college
movement, Crookston the baccalaureate polytechnic campuses, Duluth the small
research universities. Crookston, Duluth and Twin Cities [should lead] in
NASULGC and [the] AAU. Finally, UM needs to be profoundly internationalized on
all its campuses and activities. President Yudof's initiative to increase the
numbers of undergraduates who study abroad deserves enthusiastic support.
What strengths would you bring to the University and to the Board of Regents?
How would your service as a Regent enhance the quality of the University of
Minnesota?
My experience in senior administration in all three sectors of baccalaureate
education, private colleges, state universities and UM provides me both a
perspective upon higher education in this state and a credential for efforts to
increase cooperation with other institutions. It also has permitted me to live
in different areas of outstate Minnesota and thus to understand the importance
of the coordinate campuses, extension service, and research and outreach
centers. I would utilize that experience to help the University deal with the
demographic changes which are occurring in the state, e.g., the increasing
proportion of population, affluence and employment in the outer suburbs relative
to the metropolitan areas' central cores and the rural outstate counties. I
believe there are ways the University could strengthen the declining sector by
decentralizing some of its administrative functions.
3. Shared governance. First, I believe that there is a necessary division of
labor between Regents, administration, faculty and staff. Regents' role in
governance is to help develop and interpret University policy and long-range
direction. Regent role in governance is not to administer or micro-manage the
University. Second, the Board of Regents must affirm and demonstrate the
importance of close consultation with those sectors before final decisions are
made. Consultations must be models for consultation with those sectors. The
breakdown of communication and trust during the early phases of the tenure
discussion is a warning about what happens when the board is not sensitive to
the need for consultation and shared governance. The turnabout in the past year
demonstrates the potential for the University when governance is appropriately
2 February 1999
TO: Marvin Marshak, Faculty Legislative Liaison
FROM: David Johnson, candidate for the Regent-at-large seat
I thank you and the Faculty Consultative Committee for creating an opportunity for Regent candidates to describe our goals. Here are my replies:
1. UM in state, national and international contexts. I would encourage the University to take leadership in encouraging greater communication between the sectors of higher education in the state. The Board of Regents, for example, could initiate contact with other governing boards. I believe that the private colleges and MnSCU look to the University for leadership in this regard. The agenda is formidable: financial aid allocation, relationship of UMTC to Metro State to the metropolitan area community and technical colleges, joint inititives in technology. At the regional level, I would urge UM to seize opportunities for cooperation with our counterpart institutions. One good model is the Kellogg Foundation's Vision for Change project, a platform for creating contact for faculty and students from UM, NDSU and SDSU. The cooperation with UWMadison in parceling out expensive advanced degree programs, e.g., library science, is another. UM also needs to solidify its position in the top ranks of research universities. It should be the nation's leading public urban university which combines research and land-grant missions. The Morris Campus needs to lead in the public liberal arts college movement, Crookston the baccaluareate polytechnic campuses, Duluth the small research university. Crookston and Duluth Twin Cities in NASULGC and AAU. Finally, UM needs to be profoundly interntionalized on all its campuses and activities. President Yudof's initiative to increase the numbers of undergraduates who study abroad deserves enthusiastic suppport.
2. Strengths I would bring to the Regents. My experience in senior administration in all three sectors of baccalaureate education, private colleges, state universities and UM provides me both a perspective upon higher education in this state and a credential for efforts to increase cooperation with other institutions. It also has permitted me to live in different areas of outstate Minnesota and thus to understand the importance of the coordinate campuses, extension service, and research and outreach centers. I would utilize that experience to help the University deal with the demographic changes which are occurring in the state, e.g., the increasing proportion of population, affluence and employment in the outer suburbs relative to the metropolitan areas' central cores and the rural outstate counties. I believe there are ways the University could strengthen the declining sector by decentralizing some of its administrative functions.
3. Shared governance. First, I believe that there is a necessary division of labor between Regents, administration, faculty and staff. Regents' role in governance is to help develop and interpret University policy and long-range direction. Regent role in governance is not to administer or micro-manage the University. Second, the Board of Regents must affirm and demonstrate the importance of close consultation with those sectors before final decisions are made.consultation must be models for consultation with those sectors. The breakdown of communication and trust during the early phases of the tenure discussion is a warning about what happens when the board is not sensitive to the need for consultation and shared governance. The turnabout in the past year demonstrates the potential for the University when governance is appropriately shared.