|
Week II
(April 7)
Week III (April 14)
Week IV (April 21)
Week V
(April 28)
Week VI
(May 5)
Week VII-VIII
(May 12 & 19)
Week IX
(May 26)
Week X
(June 2)
Week XI
|
Topics and Assignments
All assignments should be read before the indicated class date.
Those marked with an asterisk (*) should be read by everyone.
Other readings may be assigned for individual reports and are
supplementary. You may also want to consult reviews on the various
texts that we read in class, particularly those on which you report.
Many of them have been reviewed in historical journals (American
Historical Review, Isis, Journal of American History) or in women's
studies journals (Women's Review of Books, Signs, Women's Studies).
I. March 29 Introduction
and
Overview: Reflections on women, science, gender, and history.
What do we mean by science? by technology?
What do we mean by the terms
woman/women, female, and gender? How does science influence those
definitions?
Why are there so few women evident in the history of science?
II. April 7
Gender and Science in the Origins of Modern Science
Consider the ways
in which various contemporaries might have thought about Margaret
Cavendish. What is most compelling about Merchant's argument?
How do the readings problematize the Scientific Revolution?
*Carolyn Merchant,
The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution,
(San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1980), chapters 1, 7 and 9.
*Londa Schiebinger, The Mind Has No Sex? (Cambridge: Harvard,
1989), chapters 1-2.
*Deborah E. Harkness, "Managing an Experimental Household:
The Dees of Mortlake and the Practice of Natural Philosophy"
(Isis, 1997).
III. April 14
Science for Girls and Women
What sciences attracted women in the era
of "learned ladies?" What were the
incentives for studying within the scientific tradition? What
are the boundaries of science as
practice? How did women negotiate the amateur - professional terrain
of the early nineteenth
century?
*Margaret Rossiter, Women Scientists in America, Struggles
and Strategies
to 1940 (1982), chapter 1.
*Ann B. Schteir, Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora's
Daughters
and Botany in England 1760-1860 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins,
1996), chapters
5-6.
- Pnina Abir-Am and Dorinda Outram, eds., Uneasy Careers and
Intimate
Lives, Women in Science, 1789-1979 (New Brunswick: Rutgers
University
Press, 1987).
IV. April 21
Medical and Scientific Views of Women
There was considerable opposition to the
advanced education of women, some
of it put forward by medical doctors and scientists. Women, however,
also
gained expertise and challenged the assertions and theories by
example and
by research. How were the issues negotiated among physicians,
scientists,
ordinary women, and reformers?
*Cynthia Russett, Sexual Science: The Victorian Construction
of Womanhood
(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989).
-Martha H. Verbrugge, Able-Bodied Womanhood, Personal Health
and Social
Change in Nineteenth Century Boston (New York: Oxford University
Press,
1988), chapter 5.
-Regina Morantz-Sanchez, Sympathy and Science, Women in American
Medicine
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1985), chapters 4 and 8.
-Mary Roth Walsh, "Doctors Wanted, No Women Need Apply":
Sexual
Barriers in the Medical Profession, 1839-1975 (New Haven:
Yale University Press,
1977).
V. April 28 Women
Shape Careers in Science
Margaret Rossiter's
thesis that territorial and hierarchical structures shaped women's
options is an important theoretical construct, but there are also
other dimensions to the constraints faced by women in the expanding
scientific context of the later nineteenth century. Use the biography
and the additional readings in Rossiter to think about the importance
of particular cultural settings as well as the common features
emerging in westernized cultures.
*Ann Hibner Koblitz,
A Convergence of Lives: Sofia Kovalevskaia: Scientist, Writer,
Evolutionary (Rutgers University Press, 1998; 1993).
*Margaret Rossiter, Women Scientists in America, chapter
2-4
VI. May 5
Women Scientists as Travelers, Reality and Metaphor
The University of Minnesota is developing a digitized text project
that will focus on
women travelers in conjunction, with a number of courses. With
Amy Foster, new material on
the history of science is a pilot project currently underway.
In particular, this on-line source
will include primary materials on women who traveled to do scientific
work and on women
whose travels emboldened them to investigate the natural world;
some women traveled only
in their own backyard but nonetheless both expanded their own
"world" and
contributed to science. For this week all students will undertake
a project that relates to
the new web site, identify new sources (primary and secondary)
and make use of those
already on line. Some students may expand this assignment into
their quarter project. Do
you think these women are "tigerlilies?"
VII. and VIII.
May 12 and 19
For the next two weeks we will build on the particular interests
of
students enrolled in the class. Topics will focus on the late
19th and the
20th centuries. In addition to thinking more about women in science,
I
expect that we will consider the ways in which science intersects
with
issues of gender, with particular reference to of discussions
of biology
and sexual identity in the natural world. Some potential topics
and books
include:
Women and Popularization of Science
Vera Norwood, Made from this Earth, American Women and Nature
(1993).,
Barbara Gates, Kindred Nature: Victorian
and Edwardian Women Embrace the
Living World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Body Literature
Alice Domurat Dreger, Hermaphrodites: The Medical Invention
of Sex
(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998).
Sexism in Science
James B. Watson, The Double Helix (New York: Atheneum,
1968)
Anne Sayre, Rosalind Franklin and DNA (New York: Norton,
1975)
Women and Primatology
Donna Haraway, Primate Visions or Simians, Cyborgs, and Women:
The
Reinvention of Nature(1991)
IX. May
26
Women and Scientific Achievement
By the twentieth Century women were actively achieving recognition
in science but older patterns persisted and careers did not always
go along the idealized models of professional success. Moreover,
for those who did achieve, the ambivalence about their status
as women was apparent and their very achievements seemed to carry
expectations that were burdensome to some. What criteria seem
to be used to measure women's achievement? What are the roles
they are expected to play and how do these responsibilities intersect
with the science they pursue?
*Margaret Rossiter, Struggles and Strategies, chapters
5-6, 10-11
*Evelyn Fox Keller, "Developmental Biology as a Feminist
Cause?" in Kohlstedt and Longino, eds., Women, Gender,
and Science: New Directions, Osiris 12 (1997)
*Hilary Rose, Love, Power, and Knowledge: Toward a Feminist
Transformation of the Sciences (Indiana: Indiana University
Press, 1994), esp. chapters 6 and 7.
X. June
2
Reflections on the past and thoughts about the present.
Has Londa Schiebinger changed her focus in terms of topics and
point of view in this most recent book? Which arguments do you
find most persuasive? Which least?
*Londa Schiebinger, Has Feminist Changed Science? (Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1999).
XI.
Class Projects
Presentation of final projects to the group during final exam
week. Meeting to be scheduled.
|