State of the University
State of the University 2014
Our Grand Challenges
March 6, 2014
Poverty. Social inequality. Religious intolerance. World hunger. Climate change. Disease. Those are among the most serious and intractable problems we face. They are among some of the world’s Grand Challenges.
Few organizations have the historic mission or the public charge to confront such challenges. Few institutions are allowed the intellectual freedom and curiosity to attack such problems from every angle—be it cultural understanding, public policy, historical perspective, or science. Few universities have the expertise across a range of disciplines, the resources, or the ambition to tackle these Grand Challenges.
But we do. And because we do, the State of the University of Minnesota is vibrant, it’s filled with ideas, and fueled by boundless human energy. Our great University overflows with unique promise that drives the economy, culture, and innovation of the state of Minnesota.
The Grand Challenges are ours—all of ours to solve. And I want this University to be known as a leader—a leader—in meeting these challenges, in our teaching, our curriculum, and in research, and public engagement.
Students, faculty, staff, donors, community partners—no matter how different your perspective is, I believe together we will continue to move this University forward because we share a belief some principles.
I believe those principles to be:
* A limitless ambition in all we do,
* An intolerance for complacency in our workplace or our work,
* Academic excellence and global impact,
* And civic responsibility to be a guiding force to meet those Grand Challenges.
We have every right and many reasons to be proud of the University of Minnesota and to be excited about the future—from Duluth to Rochester and from Crookston to Morris and the Twin Cities. And I’m about to tell you why.
But, first, allow me to acknowledge some key members of the University community. I’d like to thank our Board of Regents for standing strong, accountable, and active in supporting the U and me as, for example, we partnered with the State of Minnesota to do many great things, including a two-year tuition freeze for Minnesota resident undergraduates.
Board Chair Rick Beeson, Regents Linda Cohen, Tom Devine, and Abdul Omari, would you please stand? Regent Patricia Simmons is watching from Rochester and Regent David McMillan in Duluth, thank you for joining us electronically. If you want to stand, you can do that, too! To all of our Regents who couldn’t be here today, thank you for your thoughtful guidance and wisdom. I am lucky to have you as my bosses.
Leaders of the University Senate and the students, faculty, and staff in governance, thank you for joining us here today and for your service to the U. And thank you to the many students and faculty from UMD—sitting over here—who have travelled to the Twin Cities for Bulldog Day at the Capitol and for joining us today.
Also with us today are Minneapolis City Council member Andrew Johnson amd representatives from Senator Franken’s and Congressman Ellison’s offices. Thank you for your support of the University, and for being our partner.
I’m also delighted to welcome a number of new members of our senior leadership team. Vice President for Equity and Diversity Katrice Albert, Vice Provost and Dean of Students Danita Brown Young, Medical School Dean and Vice President for Health Sciences Brooks Jackson, University of Minnesota Foundation CEO Kathy Schmidlkofer, and University of Minnesota Alumni Association CEO Lisa Lewis are here today. Would you all stand and let people see what you look like?
Since I became President 31 months ago, we’ve seen a really pretty remarkable rejuvenation in the University’s senior leadership team, with three-quarters of our leaders either new to the U or their jobs. They bring fresh ideas, new energy, exceptional leadership, and, you should know, they bring lots of opinions about what we ought to do! We have a lot of work to do and we have a great team that does it—this team of senior leaders and a great team of deans.
Finally, I want to thank my wife, Karen Kaler of 34 years. She’s been working on me, trying to make me a better person. Progress has been slow, but I keep trying!
Two and a half years ago, in my inaugural address, I urged people to “pick up the pace.” It raised a few eyebrows. It caused a little bit of squirming in seats. I’m happy to say it also triggered many nods of approval in many of you who had grown impatient with higher education’s inertia, in general, and ours, in particular. Change may feel slow here, but we have picked up the pace, and I thank all of you.
For one, we have changed the nature of our conversation with state leaders and the citizens who elect them. The result is a solid reinvestment in this great University after nearly a decade of cutbacks. Besides achieving that historic tuition freeze, we infused new energy and resources into our research enterprise through the Minnesota Discovery, InnoVation and Economy initiative—or MnDRIVE—a four-legged research platform that seeks to solve some of our state’s most pressing challenges, the Grand Challenges I talked about earlier.
Internally, we are making significant progress on Operational Excellence, one of my top priorities and something we work on everyday. Let me tell you, we are aggressively tackling administrative costs. A few months ago we pledged to redirect $90 million from administrative costs over the next six years into the central mission. In this fiscal year alone, we’ve achieved cost savings by streamlining purchasing, conserving energy, and by increasing administrative efficiencies. We will hit our $15 million goal this year, and will continue to do that into the future.
We have had many successes, and I urge you to read about them at Excellence.UMN.edu, and you can also make suggestions there for improvements for the University.
On another front, the Enterprise System Upgrade Program is changing work streams across the University in core administrative areas, including student services, human resources, and finance. I thank the entire ESUP team for its remarkable success around what is truly a complicated set of processes.
Meanwhile, our new employee engagement initiative had a 57 percent response rate from all of you.
That’s the highest response rate ever for a University employee survey. Overall, our employees are highly engaged—you believe in our mission and want to build a career here. But some faculty and staff are frustrated with obstacles in the way of doing their jobs. Some days, I’m one of those! As we move forward we will remove barriers, we’ll improve productivity, and we’ll enhance work environments across the University. Our goal is simple: to provide you the workplace environment that allows you to do your jobs even better than you already do.
We have many other examples of innovating and improving without adding costs. For instance, the new Center for Educational Innovation, which will do exactly what it says. And last month, we created the Office of University Economic Development, to better define our role as the state’s economic engine and to reach out to partners in the business and entrepreneurial communities.
All of these changes—and many others—are driven by our mission to teach better, conduct research more freely, and to engage more effectively with our communities. What else have we accomplished? Lots and lots, and I’ll give you just a few examples.
Very importantly, we broke ground on a new Ambulatory Care Clinic and entered into a new, enhanced partnership with Fairview Health Services that will mean, over time, an additional $90 million will flow to our Medical School and improved patient care. That partnership will be called “University of Minnesota Health,” and it will reflect the quality of care we deliver.
As our Extension continues its important work across the state, we have strengthened our relationship with the agriculture and agribusiness communities. We’re intentionally supporting new synergies between CFANS and CBS.
Our students continue to be nationally recognized, such as Katrina Klett, who was awarded a coveted Truman Scholarship this year. It’s an honor that recognizes a handful of undergraduates nationwide who are committed to being “change agents.” Her spectacular achievement? Establishing beekeeping in five rural villages in western China, combining her language skills with her environmental science knowledge.
Katie is with us today, and I’d like to recognize her. Katie, would you please stand?
Our system campuses have raised their profiles and identity—all being recognized nationally for their distinctive characters. At Duluth, 22 students made history. They belonged to the first Master of Tribal Administration and Governance class, the only graduate degree program in the U.S. that trains people specifically in the best management practices for tribal governments.
We celebrated Rochester’s first-ever graduating class, and the campus received national accolades in Forbes magazine—believe it or not!—for its innovative approach to teaching and tenure and its unique relationship with the city of Rochester. Crookston was again named to the President's Higher Education Community Service Honor Roll for 2013, and it was named by U.S. News as the No. 1 best public regional Midwest college. And Morris’s commitment to sustainability and affordability landed it on the list of the Greenest Universities in the nation, and, just this week, was named by Kiplinger's as among the nation’s best values for a college education.
We continue to see our faculty among the nation’s most honored. For example, Jon Foley, director of our Institute on the Environment, won a 2014 Heinz Award, which brings with it a $250,000 award for his pioneering work in understanding global ecosystems and land use. That’s just one faculty honor that adds to a remarkable statistic from the last academic year: We at the University of Minnesota were the only institution in the country in having faculty elected to five of the academy’s most prestigious societies:
* the American Academy of Arts and Sciences,
* the National Academy of Sciences,
* the Institute of Medicine,
* the National Academy of Engineering and
* the American Philosophical Society.
I’d call that an academic quin-fecta, and only we achieved it.
Our Twin Cities College of Design established its “Degree in 3” pilot program, which I encouraged in my State of the University speech two years ago. It lets students earn their degrees in less time, enabling them to enter the workforce or pursue a graduate degree more quickly.
As I hope you know, increasing philanthropy is one of my top priorities to support students and faculty research. The generosity of friends of the University has been extremely encouraging this year. In a little over half of our fiscal year, we’ve raised nearly 80 percent of our goal, and we’re likely headed for a record year by our University of Minnesota Foundation. Philanthropy is critical to supporting students and faculty research. And our Alumni Association is implementing its strategic plan to more fully engage all 440,000 alumni—like me and many of you—across the world to be stronger advocates for our students, for each other, and the U.
We are a month away from reopening Northrop, an iconic structure that stands as testament to our commitment to the arts, humanities, and interdisciplinary education. It’s a gorgeous building.
So, we’ve accomplished much in the past year.
Let me turn now to graduate and professional education. We excel in undergraduate education across our system. But the signature of a research university is graduate education.
One of my first budget actions as president was to invest $6 million over three years to Doctoral Dissertation Fellowships. That’s been a success, and we’ve helped students complete their degrees more quickly and—I dare say—with higher quality. I am pleased to announce today that I will be renewing that support for an additional year, 2015. These are critically important fellowships for the next generation of world-class scholars, and I will make further investments consistent with the outcome of the strategic planning work.
The other pillar, of course, of post-baccalaurate education is professional education, and here the University stands alone in many disciplines in providing the state with trained professionals. Our AHC leads the way in interprofessional education for health care providers, where doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and others learn to work as a team to provide care. And our Law School impressively serves the common good in many ways, including the responding to the needs of Minnesota’s diverse immigrant groups through its recently formed Center for New Americans. That was funded with a generous gift from the Robina Foundation.
But make no mistake. Professional schools face enormous challenges in maintaining excellence and affordability. And those challenges are among the most important we face as an institution. As we have done to support our undergraduates, we will lead in exploring opportunities to partner with the State of Minnesota to educate and retain these professionals, particularly in underserved areas of Minnesota.
Which leads me to other challenges we face amid all that we’ve accomplished.
Last week, with the convening of the legislative session, we turned our attention to the Capitol seeking support from Minnesota lawmakers to upgrade our facilities so that students learn and faculty teach and research in facilities suitable for the 21st century. The request contains important funding for maintenance and renewal across the system, new buildings for science and teaching in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, and a wellness center in Crookson. I urge all of you to take seriously—please—our roles as advocates for the University, and to raise your voices, and please be sure to join our Legislative Action Network.
Another urgent challenge is ensuring that our University population mirrors the racial and cultural diversity of our state and nation. Advancing equity and diversity is a priority of mine, but we need to do better. Too often, students of color come from families of limited means. Thus, a necessary step to increasing the number of students of color is to make the University more affordable.
This year we expanded the Presidents Emerging Scholars program that serves primarily first-generation and low-income students, and that’s part of redoubling our efforts to recruit and enroll more diverse students.
We launched a new initiative—called Retaining All Our Students—to help ensure low-income students successfully transition from their first to second year of college. However, despite this work and our clear commitment, our record is poor on attracting and retaining students of color—particularly African American men. The number of African American students on our Twin Cities campus is fewer than 4 percent. And for African American men, it’s even lower. We need to showcase the academic opportunities they can find here.
We also know that for many of our students of color on the Twin Cities campus, the environment could be more welcoming. Students have said they sometimes feel singled out as the only student of color in a class, and some feel profiled by others on campus because of their race. To more proactively address these issues, we recently convened senior leaders—from my office, Equity and Diversity, the Provost’s office, Human Resources, University Services, and Student Affairs—to develop new strategies to improve campus climate. Each system campus is also attentive to these issues. With our new Campus Climate Workgroup, I look forward to seeing new initiatives this spring and next fall and I am prepared to provide the resources this team needs to implement their plans.
One especially big challenge we’ve faced this past fall on and around our Minneapolis campus is an increase in crime.
Over the past decade, public safety here has improved, with incidents dropping by half. However, this fall we saw an uptick in robberies, primarily in the neighborhoods near campus. Let me be clear, the numbers are relatively small, an increase of 7 incidents over an average of 27 during this period, with all but three of those total incidents occurring off campus.
We know that our students, their parents, legislators, and the public do not distinguish between on- or off-campus, and neither do I. We need to make sure our students are safe.
To that end, we’ve put into place an aggressive public safety initiative called Safe U. The Board of Regents supported our plan to reallocate $4.1 million to add lights and security cameras, and secure buildings. We’ve hired more police officers and student Security Monitors and have funded overtime hours for our officers. And our partners in Minneapolis have added six additional officers, with a seventh to come soon, in the Second Precinct where many of our students live, and I am grateful for that. Our students have gotten deeply involved in addressing public safety, and I thank them.
Everyone who works, studies, lives or visits our Twin Cities campus—80,000 people every day—must feel safe and secure.
This public safety challenge has underscored a pressing reality, and that is really a compelling need to be a more engaged institutional citizen and partner with the City of Minneapolis and our neighborhoods. For too long, we at the University have seemed not to care about development surrounding our Minneapolis campus, which I believe has attracted at least some of the crime we’ve experienced.
In the neighborhoods around campus, 7,000 new housing units have been added recently and another 7,000 are in the pipeline. That means a higher concentration of students living near campus than ever before. It means that the distinction between “on campus” and “off campus” has become blurred.
And these changes mean our neighborhoods have different needs today than in the past. For example, walkability, bikeability, and a range of amenities are important to neighborhood livability for our students and they need to be important to the institution. We must lead this dialogue and be more proactive, engaged, and thoughtful as a neighbor. Over the next few months, we will forge a new set of guiding principles for working with the City of Minneapolis and our neighborhoods. I expect to bring our new approach to the Board of Regents for their information in June.
The good news is that this stepped up relationship with our community dovetails perfectly with a key direction of our Strategic Planning process.
And let me turn to that now. To complete Strategic Planning on our Twin Cities campus is a high priority for this year. It is a plan that will align and be integrated with the directions of our system campuses.
When we launched this effort last summer, I laid some foundational directions. First, I wanted this plan to be bold and focused, to be developed thoughtfully but in a timely fashion, and, most importantly, to be ambitious.
If it wasn’t ambitious, then it wasn’t going to be strategic enough for me. I must tell you, I am very pleased and excited about the direction the Strategic Plan is developing under Provost Hanson’s leadership. For one, it has been faculty driven, and that’s extremely important, but staff, student, and stakeholder voices are there, too, through membership in the Strategic Planning Workgroup, online surveys, a campus conversation, and focused discussions.
With the permission of the Workgroup, I’d like to share with you the directions in which we’re headed.
The group has established a set of four strategic and overarching initiatives, strategies that will establish incentives to empower faculty and staff to excel at what they do every day.
These emerging initiatives are, I think, frankly, inspiring, and I want to spend some time on them with you.
The primary goal of the Strategic Plan is how I began these remarks: That we as a University become pre-eminent in solving the Grand Challenges of a diverse and changing world. To do that, we will hold ourselves and each other accountable, and we have to hold the bar high.
This is one of four emerging strategies: that we will support excellence and, with intention, reject complacency.
The University of Minnesota should not be a place to feel self-satisfied with the status quo. I don’t think there’s any room at all for contentment when we confront critical internal and external challenges.
The faculty and staff and students on the Workgroup who have driven this strategic planning process want us to be exceptional. I want us to be exceptional. And our community wants and demands that we be exceptional. So let’s set—and then reach—that goal.
Rejecting complacency, however, will only get us part of the way there. Another strategy, therefore, is to recruit and retain field-shaping researchers and teachers. There is no great university without world-renowned faculty, with the highest recognition and whose creative work defines their field. But we also must face a reality. Forty-one percent of our faculty members on the Twin Cities campus are 55 or older. I’m one of them! What that means is that in the next decade or so, we could be saying goodbye to many of our most valued and productive colleagues.
While their loss will be real, it is also a wonderful opportunity for renewal. We need to be proactive about attracting faculty of the future and be mindful that the world’s best young scholars will only come to a university that is vibrant, cutting edge, and diverse. So we are committed to hiring, welcoming, nurturing, and promoting the best faculty—faculty who will lead this institution into the future.
The third emerging strategy for the Strategic Planning Group is to ensure that the Twin Cities campus embraces what the Workgroup is calling “a culture of permeability.” I don’t really like that, so I call it leveraging our location. The Twin Cities campus is in the 16th largest metro area in the nation, with one of the country’s best economies, in a region regularly considered the healthiest to live, in a place with 19 Fortune 500 company headquarters, in a theater, arts, and culture mecca, and with one of the world ‘s great rivers flowing—most of the year!—the entire length of the country. This is an incredible place to live. This is an incredible institution. Better leveraging our location simply makes sense, for both us and our community.
Pragmatically, it means, among other things: more internships and eventual employment for our students, and even more research to tackle the state’s and metro area’s achievement, employment, and opportunity gaps.
At its core, this institution seeks to educate, cultivate, and empower leaders to create institutional and societal change. In order to do that, our curriculum must change. I believe we should lead in developing courses and degree programs that equip our students to tackle the Grand Challenges that rarely fall in a single discipline.
So, let me tell you a story about what could happen here in the future.
A young woman grows up in Wayzata, surrounded by neighbors in banking, finance, and management.
She thinks she wants to follow in her parents’ footsteps and lead a company. She is a really good student, so she’s admitted to the U and the Carlson School, but among her freshman classes is English 1401-W, “Literatures of the Third World.” In this class, she is introduced to authors she didn’t know, stories she’d never heard, and ideas she’d never considered.
Something clicks. She’s realizing she really must improve her writing, all the while learning about ways of knowing and being that she had never considered. She’s learning that being a business leader isn’t just about balance sheets and income statements. It’s also about clear communication, critical thinking, leadership, and curiosity.
And she discovers that—even more deeply in her sophomore year—when she takes a class at the Carlson School called Management 1005, “Corporate Responsibility and Ethics.” She is assigned the essay question—and this is not imaginary, but an assignment in 1005 this very spring—“Copper Nickel Mining in Northeastern Minnesota.” Topical. She becomes fascinated by the ethical issues that impact job creation, the environment, human rights, and regional economic development.
She talks to her Carlson professor. “I want to be a business leader,” she says, “but these courses have made me want to work through the connections between environmental issues and the economy. How do I pursue that?”
“A-ha,” says the professor. “You can now take one of our Grand Challenges minors, which intentionally explores these and related issues.”
So, the point is we must encourage students, and create ways for students to become experts in the disciplines of their college, but to cut across disciplines and recognize the skills needed to tackle these Grand Challenges.
She sees a Grand Challenge across disciplines, across colleges. Multiply that story by 7,500 graduates a year, and you have a measure of the impact this great university can have on the state and nation. So that is the evolving vision for a new Grand Challenges curriculum, and that is how our Twin Cities campus Strategic Planning process is unfolding. And I thank the Workgroup members for their exceptional work so far.
They’re not done … yet. A final plan should be in place by the end of September and then the real fun begins as we implement it. But this is bold. This is relevant. This is invigorating, and a plan to enhance critical thinking and engaged learning and research that our graduates—and their future employers—are seeking.
So let me close with this thought. As we continue to change and evolve, we must not ignore the lasting legacy this University owns across the state and around the world. We should celebrate the incredible potential we hold in our hands because of this coalition of scholars, community leaders, and the thousands of young people with dreams and solutions who have come before us. I want this University to have a Grand Ambition and apply that against our many Grand Challenges.
Let’s do that work together.
Download post–State of the U Q&A with President Kaler.