Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content.University of Minnesota.
Driven to Discover.
Office of the President Home.

What's inside.

President Bruininks on:

Access and Affordability

The Future of Higher Education

Human Capital and Economic Impact

Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation

Organizational Excellence

PreK-12 Education

Public Engagement

Transformational Leadership


About President Bruininks

About the Office of the President

News and Communications

Contact Us

Office of the President Home


Eastcliff.

Eastcliff: The Official Residence

  Home | News and Communications

2002 State of the University Address

University of Minnesota
Robert H. Bruininks, Interim President
October 3, 2002

It is an honor, in my 35th year at the University of Minnesota, to serve as Interim President of this great institution. Succeeding Mark Yudof is a daunting task, but, from serving as Executive Vice President and Provost for five years, I can tell you that the vision he and I shared for the University remains the touchstone for my work here. Mark deserves our thanks, and I think the University community did a good job of recognizing his many contributions in the weeks leading up to his and Judy’s departure.

In fact, President Yudof finished up his work here on a day that I was out of town, so he used the office I recently moved into. When I came back, I found notes posted from Mark on my wife’s picture, my bookshelf and my favorite trophy:

  • I am a great lover of the outdoors—that’s part of the reason I’ve made this state my home for so long--and one of my prize possessions is a giant walleye I caught. (Soon after I caught the fish, my oldest son opined that, based upon observations of his father’s fishing ability, he was absolutely certain the fish had committed suicide.) Anyway, the fish is stuffed and mounted in a display case. On that case Mark left a note saying, "No time for fishing!"
  • I found another when I went to look for a pencil. This one said: "By now, you’re obviously in too deep--assign this task to the Provost!"…which gave me some insight into my life as provost for the past five years.

For my part, I want to thank the many interconnected communities here at the University, and particularly our academic community, for the support they’ve given to me and to my administration.

Susan and I have had to do some adjusting to these new titles and responsibilities. I’ve been cleared to tell you that she recently introduced herself as the "interim wife of the president."—still sorting out this new title.

While this may be a time of transition, both in university leadership and in the state budget climate, I want to assure you that leadership of this great university is fully committed to maintaining an upward trajectory, to fulfilling the promises we’ve made to the University community and to the state of Minnesota. We have an excellent team of senior leaders in place-- perhaps the best leadership team assembled here at the University. And we are governed by a dedicated group of regents as well as the wise faculty and staff with us here today.

In our research, in the caliber of students we are attracting and in the quality experience they get on our campuses, we cannot afford to slow down. We are an institution with a century and a half legacy of learning and innovation. At the same time, we are in an increasingly competitive environment—for the best faculty and staff, for the best students, for limited state dollars, for sponsored research funding, and for private gifts. Truly, to mark time is to lose ground in higher education today.

University Successes

You can see a lot at the University of Minnesota today that exemplifies our strength and vitality.

For our students, faculty, staff and alumni, the campus renaissance we have experienced on our campuses for the past several years is slowly moving from jackhammers to genomics, from dust and detours to digital technology and design. It is a great source of pride for me to see the dozens of projects that are either finished or well underway, including:

  • Cutting-edge research and education facilities like Walter Library, the Molecular and Cellular Biology Building, and the Science Building West Wing at Morris.
  • Great centers for cultural life, like the Weber Music Performance Center at UMD, UMC’s Kiehle Building expansion, and the Twin Cities’ new Art Teaching and Research Facility.
  • New living and learning spaces for students, including a significant increase in modern classrooms, Riverbend Commons on the East Bank, and the Griggs Hall addition in Duluth.
  • And the list goes on, with literally dozens of projects that strengthen our commitment to fields from architecture to plant biology to journalism and the social sciences.
  • To continue this necessary capital renewal, we will ask the Board of Regents to resubmit to the legislature the important capital projects vetoed by the Governor this past spring.

Regarding our students, both our applications and our enrollments continue to rise.

  • Across the University, we have a decades high 62,000 students enrolled—a 4 percent increase over last year.
  • Across the University, the average level of educational preparedness of incoming freshmen is the highest it has ever been.
  • And once students, particularly our undergraduates, arrive at University of Minnesota campuses, their experience continues to improve with:
    • New policies regarding minimum course loads and tuition pricing on the Twin Cities campus that appear to be having the intended effect of increased course loads, boding well for future graduation rates.
    • Online paperless financial aid, which has cut aid acceptance time from 6 weeks to 5 days.
    • Undergraduate Research Opportunities programs.
    • New first year experience programs, including new honor societies, better information for parents, special housing programs, broader participation in orientation and many other opportunities.
    • In another area of the student experience, on our Twin Cities campus, we have a newly united Department of Athletics under the spirited leadership of Joel Maturi. The department was recently ranked seventh in the nation by Sports Illustrated for its overall excellence.
  • Our graduate and professional programs are experiencing similar successes. Enrollment of these students is up by 14 percent across the University, and Graduate and Professional students comprise more than 40 percent of our graduates here in the Twin Cities.

As Art Rolnick, a graduate and a senior vice president of the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, has said, "The University’s product—the gold it produces—is its well educated students and its…research."(1) And that research enterprise continues to grow.

  • The University’s sponsored research topped half a billion dollars last year. That’s testimony to the hard work and commitment to curiosity-driven discovery among our faculty.
  • It is also a tribute to the quality and dedication of our faculty and staff that the University of Minnesota Twin Cities campus was again ranked for the second consecutive year as one of the top three public research universities in the nation by a University of Florida study.

The University’s strength and excellence extends beyond the Twin Cities campus.

On our Duluth campus, in addition to new buildings, an amazing enrollment of 9,800 students, and a second consecutive national championship in the NCAA Women’s Frozen Four, great things are happening:

  • Making good on the University’s promise to the state, a new pharmacy program at Duluth will address the statewide shortage of pharmacists.
  • In May, 28 American Indian graduates from a variety of bands and tribes received Master of Education degrees from UMD, in a cooperative program with MnSCU’s Fond du Lac College.

Moving south, our University of Minnesota, Rochester Branch signed a new agreement with MnSCU. Provost David Carl has been working hard to expand new academic programs in a variety of fields to address the education and workforce needs of Southeast Minnesota.

Zooming back up North and West, our Morris campus continues to win accolades for its unique brand of liberal arts education on a small public campus. One study ranked UMM number four among all the nation's public liberal arts colleges and moved Morris into the third tier of the "national liberal arts" institutions, making it one of the very few public institutions in that elite category.

Further north and west, in Crookston, where many of us were warmly hosted by the community during last month’s Regents meeting, UMC is marking its tenth year as a baccalaureate institution. In addition to winning a national award for "Ubiquitous Computing," UMC has also had a banner year for development, receiving the largest gift ever made to the campus and surpassing its Campaign Minnesota Goal by more than a million dollars!

And Speaking of Campaign Minnesota, our staff, faculty, volunteers, and donors deserve great accolades for exceeding our overall campaign goal of $1.3 billion as we begin our last year of this fundraising effort.

  • We’ve raised more than $1.4 billion thus far.
  • More than 8,500 faculty and staff have contributed $57 million, illustrating strong employee commitment.
  • Ninety-eight new endowed chairs have been created, as well as more than 500 endowed scholarships and fellowships.
  • In the last year, the campaign will focus on student support, our libraries, and remaining campus and college-specific goals. I am confident we will reach these goals.

Finally, throughout the 87 counties of Minnesota, our Extension service has reorganized in order to take better advantage of new technology and to provide more specialized expertise and clearer connections to the university's faculty and research.

This has been a very limited summary that defines the proud achievements, qualities and extraordinary impacts of the University of Minnesota. Overall, the state of the University is better than the Minnesota "pretty good;" it is truly strong and getting stronger.

Context, and the Case for the U

This year, more than ever, we will have to make the case for the University and for higher education. To me, it is unacceptable that only 3 percent of Minnesotans believe that higher education is a priority in addressing the state’s budget challenges.

In the broadest context, we face a challenge to the long-held consensus that higher education is a public good.

  • The education-income function today is quite striking. A person with a bachelor’s degree makes almost a million dollars more in lifetime earnings over a person with a high school education, with more advanced degrees yielding much higher rates of return.(2)
  • That private return, I fear, has begun to overshadow the public good provided by higher education—particularly by public higher education institutions like the U.
  • We know that funding for public higher education has declined substantially as a proportion of state budgets and as a percentage of personal income across the country over the past quarter century, and Minnesota has not been immune to this trend.
  • This has led many public university presidents to comment that, "We used to be state supported, then we became state assisted, and now we are state-located."(3)

In the short-term, as far as the state’s economy goes, I believe this is the most challenging year we have faced in the past 15 to 20 years.

  • Minnesota’s projected deficit, adjusted for inflation, is almost $3 billion. The state has already eliminated hundreds of jobs, and school districts as well as health and social service agencies are facing similar difficulties.
  • At the U, we’ve already absorbed a permanent, recurring $24 million cut—that’s four percent-- as part of the 2002 legislative session. We took this cut while safeguarding important academic investments.
  • In 2003, Minnesota will have a new governor and the greatest turnover in years at the Legislature. We will have to renew the case for the U with many new faces.

Fortunately, the case for funding the University remains strong, and there are many benefits that accumulate to the public from funding research universities like ours.

  • As I mentioned, the University currently attracts $527 million in sponsored research funds or 98 percent of the competitive sponsored funds that go to higher education in Minnesota. It’s an important leveraging of the state’s annual investment.
  • We have strengthened our commercialization of technology operations to help ensure that our research innovations, where viable, are taken to market to provide the greatest good possible.
  • We graduate between 10,000 and 11,000 students a year in a broad range of majors. We estimate that more than half of our graduates remain in state, contributing to the recruitment and retention of a highly trained workforce in key fields.
  • As a state, we will continue to be a net importer of talent. In that vein, the University of Minnesota is an integral part of attracting what Carnegie Mellon Prof. Richard Florida calls the creative class, an increasingly important group of skilled professionals who are a linchpin of a knowledge-based economy.(4) To keep the Twin Cities attractive as one of the top 10 "creative" urban areas, he urges investment in the University.(5)
  • We can make similar cases for the economic impact of our other campuses, not to mention our six Research and Outreach Centers. The economy of Northeast Minnesota, for example, relies on UMD for well-educated graduates, for the applied research into mineral and forest products by the Natural Resources Research Institute, and for research on environmental changes affecting the Great Lakes.
  • But the case for U funding goes beyond economic growth. We play a vital role in the cultural life of this state. As just one example, our School of Music here in Minneapolis is celebrating its 100th anniversary. Just think of that—one hundred years of teaching students what Longfellow called "the universal language of mankind." The University can lay similar long-term claims to education and creation in all the visual and performing arts, and to other major contributions to the social well-being of this state.

But,

  • Making the case for the U also extends to the way the state allocates funding for higher education.
  • After three decades in public higher education, I remain skeptical of the high tuition-high aid model, where the challenge of financing higher education is supposedly found in "letting the money follow the students." The more extreme version of this idea reminds me of what Mencken once said: "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong."
  • We do have a higher education system—public and private--in this state that has strengths in many areas. It is evident that we must have reasonable levels of financial aid for individual students that will help them finance the educational experience that best suits them.
  • It is also important to note that "the money should follow the student" position applies to support of undergraduates. The strategy does not address the need to support research or graduate and professional study. These are critically important issues for the University.
  • In my view, we have to maintain the appropriate balance in funding higher education: we must support individuals (the private good arguments) and systems (the public good side I’ve outlined previously).

Biennial Proposal—a partnership

  • As I’ve mentioned, the current state and national economic context places special responsibilities upon us this year.
  • Even in an era when state funding has waned, it is still important to recognize that the state is a crucial part of our resource base, providing over $600 million each year. It represents a third of our overall budget and more than 40 percent of our instructional budget. It is worthy of our attention.
  • We have a responsibility to the state to present what this University needs to maintain our current strength and progress, and to build on 151 years of greatness. This is not a time to be shy about the U’s needs or shrink from the challenges of investment in the U of M.
  • On the other hand, we have to maintain a position of credibility and responsibility in today’s state budget environment. We have to be cognizant of the state’s economic realities, and show that we are willing to shoulder our part by strategically and proactively making the best use of existing state and tuition dollars.
  • This month we will bring before the Board of Regents a recommendation about the broad areas of investment we need--to continue improving the U’s strength and vitality.
  • This will be our lowest biennial proposal in 10 years; it will respect the state’s economic challenges, and reaffirm our internal commitment to setting priorities and cost-savings.
  • Our approach this year will depart somewhat from past practice. Up front, we will propose a reasoned, 50-50 partnership with the state when it comes to financing our increased needs. Our proposal will show our commitment to using internal reallocation and tuition increases to invest in the future of the University at the same time that we seek essential, new state resources.
  • I’d like to digress a moment. This is an opportune time for us to think creatively about ways the University can seize natural opportunities to enhance service and productivity and to reduce unnecessary costs. That is why we are launching an enhanced service and productivity initiative, with a financial goal of achieving at least $5 million in savings through a combination of cost reductions or new revenue enhancements.
  • And what does this mean in practice? I think we can point to some good, recent examples of improved service and increased efficiency that we would like to replicate in different areas of the University:
    • Our newly created paperless student financial aid system saves 700,000 pieces of paper each year and some $250,000 in costs.
    • Our recent move to online pay statements saves the University an estimated $150,000 each year.
    • So, our efforts to improve our service and efficiency are linked to our pledge to reallocate and cut costs, a major component of the financing partnership we are proposing with the state.
    • These creative ideas came from our faculty and staff. Carol Carrier and Chuck Muscoplat, co-leaders of this critically important initiative, need your new ideas.

Biennial Proposal –Priorities

  • As a University, our successes have been catalyzed by intentionally setting priorities. In my view, great institutions and organizations set and fund their priorities, they measure and report what they value (accountability), they don’t "lurch" in their focus, and they follow through on their commitments.
  • These qualities—direction, continuity, and commitment—characterize the University of Minnesota today, and they characterize our proposal for the biennial request. In this proposal, the University will continue to:
    • Implement and Support Academic Directions. Within this area, we will seize "tipping point" opportunities by investing programs that are on the cusp of prominence; build on recent strategic investments and extend those investments into niche areas of national significance; and sustain the best at our university—that is, the programs and departments that have made us one of the top public research universities;
    • Support talented faculty and staff, the cornerstone of a strong university. This includes reasonable compensation and resources to retain our most talented colleagues.
    • Help students realize their educational goals by making investments to improve the student experience;
    • and build and maintain the academic infrastructure, from libraries to technology support which, as I’ve mentioned, is key to our ability to attract, retain and support our faculty, staff and students.

Call to Action

  • Today the University of Minnesota is in excellent health, and all of us—regents, faculty, staff, students, elected leaders and citizens of this state—can take enormous pride in how we’ve made it a better place.
  • This will be a tough year, but recall our 150 years of greatness and the significant improvement in service and academic quality in the past several years.
  • From 35 years (23%) of personal experience I can tell you that this University has faced difficult times in the past, and we have weathered them. We will weather these times as well.
  • As we embark on the next 150 years, this is a time for a renewal of the covenant we have with the people of Minnesota.
  • The people of this state have been generous to the University and they have seen us deliver on our promises.
  • They can rely on us to continue to live up to our commitments and to a heritage that reaches back even before the founding of this state.
  • I believe, that, in the end, institutions with strong values endure and thrive, no matter if they are a university, a business, or a civic group. But organizations must have a vision for the future, and they must constantly reinvent themselves around their values to achieve that vision. That is even more true in tough times. Today I believe we have a vision, and we must advance and share it.
  • To advance excellence at the University, we need your help in conveying the importance of the University and its current needs. Candidates, and then newly-elected state officials need to hear the case for the University.
  • As former U of M President Lotus Coffman once said: the University "breathes the spirit of the social order…is constantly engaged in an attempt to understand the meaning of the age (and is) dominated by a philosophy of helpfulness."
  • Let us keep that curiosity, reflection and ethos of discovery and helpfulness alive in this next year.
  • Thank you for your attention today and for your work in making this a great University, and for the honor of serving as your interim president.
  1. Quoted in Minnesota, Volume 102, No. 1, September-October, 2002.
  2. Cheeseman Day, Jennifer and Newberger, Eric C., "The Big Payoff: Educational Attainment and Synthetic Estimates of Work-Life Earnings," Current Population Reports, p. 23-10, Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, 2001.
  3. Breneman, D.W., "For Colleges, This Is Not Just Another Recession," Chronicle of Higher Education, June 14, 2002.
  4. Florida, Richard. "The Rise of the Creative Class," Washington Monthly, May 2002.
  5. Florida, Richard, in an interview on Minnesota Public Radio's Midmorning, July 17, 2002.


(back to top)