|
HUMAN
RIGHTS COMMITTEE SESSION 21
|
|
X
v. S, Communication No. 252/1987, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/31/D/252/l987,
U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 4 (1990).
|
|
K. Baboeram-Adhin, and J. Kamperveen et al. v. Suriname, Communication Nos. 146/1983 and 148-54/1983, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/D/146/l983, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 5 (1990). |
| L.S.N. v. Canada, Communication No. 94/1981, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 6 (1990). |
| M. M. Q. v. Uruguay, Communication No. 125/1982, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 8 (1990). |
| M.A. v. Italy, Communication No. 117/1981, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 31 (1990). |
| Disabled and handicapped persons in Italy v. Italy, Communication No. 163/1984, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 47 (1990). |
| Héctor Alfredo Romero v. Uruguay, Communication No. 85/1981, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 116 (1990). |
| Teresa Gómez de Voituret v. Uruguay, Communication No. 109/1981, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 146 (1990). |
| Antonio Viana Acosta v. Uruguay, Communication No. 110/1981, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 148 (1990). |
| Jorge Manera Johnson v. Uruguay, Communication No. 123/1982, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 155 (1990). |
| A. P. v. Italy, Communication No. 204/1986, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 67 (1990). |