|
|
|
The
Domestic Legal Framework
As discussed in the sections
on the International Legal Framework and Regional
Law and Standards,
the United Nations, Council of Europe and European Union have all created
legally binding documents that obligate States to adopt laws at the national
level with the aim of prosecuting traffickers and protecting trafficked persons
from further harm. These international bodies have placed greater emphasis
on the obligation of national governments to undertake law enforcement measures
than provide victim services. Therefore, the first legislative reform efforts
have resulted in a number of countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the
Commonwealth of Independent States(CEE/CIS) enacting legislation that criminalizes
trafficking in persons. More recently, efforts have been made to harmonize
European immigration policy, specifically asylum law, with a view to providing
trafficked persons with greater measures of protection in the destination
country. The United States has
also introduced legislation, discussed in the section on victim protection and immigration law,
which introduces specific visas for trafficked persons.
Currently, regional organizations,
such as the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and
the Stability Pact Task Force on Trafficking in Human Beings, are conducting
cooperative projects, between international organizations, national government
ministries and local NGOs, to provide assistance and services to victims.
Although signatories to the United Nations Trafficking Protocol are obliged
to undertake measures to provide victims with assistance and protection, there
are few laws at the national level regulating how such aid will be provided
and to whom.
Contents:
Resources on Domestic Legislation
Below are some resources
which advocates may find useful in researching domestic anti-trafficking laws:
The
Protection Project, a legal human rights research
institute based at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International
Studies in Washington, D.C. hosts a site that includes a searchable Legal
Library of national and international laws and case law.
The Organization for Security and Cooperation
in Europe hosts a website with information about
legislation on trafficking. The Legislationonline
site for trafficking includes links to United Nations law, Council of Europe Law
and laws from 53 countries of the CEE/CIS region, Europe and North America.
UNICEF, the Office for Democratic Institutions
and Human Rights (ODIHR) and UNHCHR published a report Trafficking
in Human Beings in Southeastern Europe:
Current situation and responses to trafficking in human beings in Albania,
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia,
the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Moldova and Romania, in
June 2002. This report includes information about law reform, law
enforcement and prosecution for the countries listed above.
The Reference
Guide for Anti-Trafficking Legislative Review with a particular emphasis
on South Eastern Europe,
also published by the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, in September
2001,
is a comprehensive guide to the types of legislation necessary for an effective
anti-trafficking policy. The Reference Guide is organized according to
broad topics, prevention, prosecution and protection and assistance for
victims,
and provides examples of national legislation where possible. The Reference
Guide is less useful as a source for specific national law, but an excellent
resource for advocates who are undertaking projects on legal reform related
to trafficking in women. The guide is also available in Russian: Руководящие
Принципы по Пересмотру
Законодательства
против Торговли
Людьми,
and in Serbian: Priručnik
za Reviziju Zakonske Regulative protiv Trgovine Ljudima.
The report Women
2000: An Investigation into the Status of Women’s Rights in the former
Soviet Union and Central and South-Eastern Europe published by the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights in November
2000 includes information about a range of women’s rights issues for 30 countries
in the CEE and CIS region, and information on legal provisions on trafficking,
where available.
Guidelines on Criminal Law
Victims of trafficking may be subjected
to a number of criminal acts, such as kidnapping, physical and sexual assault
or imprisonment, all of which are prohibited under general criminal provisions.
Advocates should exert pressure on local government authorities to prosecute
such criminal offenses when the victims are trafficked persons even when prosecution
of the crime of trafficking is not possible.
As mentioned above, many national
governments’ first legal reform efforts on the issue of trafficking in persons
is the creation of a distinct criminal offense. The creation of domestic
criminal law on trafficking serves a number of purposes. First, the existence
of a distinct offense of trafficking in human beings compels law enforcement
authorities to address the problem. As noted by human rights advocates, trafficking
and the attendant criminal violations are infrequently prosecuted in countries
without specific criminal provisions that address trafficking. In some cases,
trafficking in women is prosecuted under provisions that relate to smuggling
or forced prostitution. Because such legal provisions are limited, however,
traffickers receive relatively low penalties that are not reflective of the
scope of the criminal activity that takes place in trafficking cases and which
are not effective as a deterrent. Furthermore, victims themselves may face
prosecution for illegal entry, illegal work or involvement in prostitution.
Second, a clearly-defined offense
of trafficking allows for prosecution of a range of activities, and not merely
prostitution. According to a 2001 Council of Europe report, for example,
“No member state of the Council of Europe has made express provision under
its criminal law for an offence of keeping domestic slaves” despite the fact
that most domestic services in Europe are being fulfilled by female immigrants.
Most often, domestic servants, many of whom are subjected to intolerable working
conditions and mistreatment, are treated under domestic law as illegal immigrants.
Third, harmonized criminal law across
nations allows for cross-border law enforcement cooperation in the investigation
and prosecution of trafficking cases. Because traffickers frequently move
their victims from country to country and women are sold and re-sold in the
trafficking process, it may be necessary for more than one country to provide
information vital to the prosecution of a trafficker or trafficking ring.
Defining the Offense
The first step in the creation of criminal law
on trafficking in persons is a clear definition of the crime.
The articulation of the meaning of ‘trafficking in persons’ in
the 2000 UN Trafficking Protocol is the only legally binding international
definition. The definition
is broad and describes the crime in detail, focusing on the conditions
of forced labor and slavery-like practices, without required cross-border
movement. As Ann Jordan, Director of the Initiative Against Trafficking
in Persons of the International Human Rights Law Group. a U.S.
NGO, points out, however, the international definition is not
appropriate for use in domestic criminal codes. From The
Annotated
Guide to the UN Trafficking Protocol. Such a broad definition
of the crime contains many elements and some of the language is
vague, both of which would make prosecution difficult.
The International Human Rights Law
Group suggests alternative language that could be used in a domestic criminal
law:
“Trafficking in persons” shall mean the recruitment,
transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons, by
any means, for forced labor or services, slavery or practices
similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.
Under this definition, prosecutors
would not have to prove threat, coercion, abuse of power or other forms of
fraud or deception. The proposed definition focuses on the process of moving
a person in order to hold them in conditions of forced labor or slavery as
essential to the crime. The proposed definition also eliminates undefined
terms used in the UN Trafficking Protocol, such as “the exploitation of prostitution
of others,” and “other forms of sexual exploitation,” referring only to broad
categories of acts that are already defined as crimes in international and
national law.
The OSCE takes a different approach
from the International Human Rights Law Group, recommending that the definition
of trafficking should include at least the three following elements:
-
Acts: recruitment,
transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of a person;
-
Means: threat
or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, fraud,
deception, abuse of power or
a position of vulnerability;
-
Purpose: forced
labor or services, slavery, slavery-like practices or servitude.
From the Reference
Guide for Anti-Trafficking Legislative Review with a particular
emphasis
on South Eastern Europe.
Scope of the Law
In some other respects effective criminal law
should be more expansive than the provisions of the Protocol.
For example, the International Human Rights Law Group advises
broadening the scope of domestic legislation in so far as who
can be prosecuted. Article 4 of the Trafficking Protocol states
that its provisions apply to the prosecution of offenses that
“are transnational in nature and involve an organized criminal
group.” As Ann Jordan, the author of the Annotated Guide to the
UN Trafficking Protocol, indicates, the Protocol does “not cover
trafficking by one or two persons or internal trafficking that
has no international aspect. . . . Also not covered is trafficking
that is done entirely within a country by nationals of the country.”
Thus, effective domestic legislation should punish individual
traffickers and organized crime groups for both cross-border and
internal trafficking.
Criminalization of Activities Related
to Trafficking
The OSCE also recommends that all
activities related to trafficking be criminalized. Trafficking is often carried
out by organized groups, which participate to varying degrees in various activities,
such as recruitment, transportation, escort and accommodation of trafficked
persons. The most significant of these acts would likely be punished under
criminal trafficking or organized crime laws, but lesser acts, such as the
arrangement of employment or even the use of the services of a trafficked
victim, may not now be sufficient to establish criminal liability. In addition,
trafficking is facilitated by acts of omission, such as border guards who
ignore the activity. A strong criminal law should also recognize such failures
to act as abetting the trafficking process. Thus, the OSCE recommends the
following: that States “establish all activities related to trafficking as
criminal offences (such as instigating, aiding, abetting, attempting, omission
to act against and conspiracy to traffic), . . . specifically establish the
activities of organized criminal groups involved in trafficking as a criminal
offence [and] . . . ensure that trafficking cases involving public officials
are prosecuted and involve not only disciplinary consequences, but also sanctions
under criminal law.”
Non-criminalization of Trafficking
Victims
Another important and basic consideration in
drafting criminal law provisions on trafficking is to ensure that
the trafficking victim is not punished for her connection to the
trafficking. Provisions intended to punish accomplices to the
offenses that comprise a case of trafficking should never be used
to prosecute the victim. Thus, legislation should be drafted
with the clear intent of punishing the trafficker(s). Trafficked
persons are often treated by national law enforcement as criminals,
both in countries of destination and origin. In destination countries,
victims are most likely to be prosecuted for immigration violations,
violations of employment law and for involvement in prostitution.
If returned to their home country or country of origin, trafficking
victims could face prosecution for using false documents, illegally
leaving the country or for having worked in the sex industry.
The OSCE makes two broad recommendations to protect trafficked
persons from criminal prosecution: that States not prosecute victims
for “trafficking-related offenses” (i.e. using false documents
or working without authorization) and that if trafficked persons
are prosecuted for crimes committed during the period in which
they were trafficked, they be afforded a legal defense of having
been subjected to psychological coercion, physical force or threats
when committing the crime. The U.S. anti-trafficking law, the
Victims
of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, for example,
states that “Victims of severe forms of trafficking should not
be inappropriately incarcerated, fined, or otherwise penalized
solely for unlawful acts committed as a direct result of being
trafficked, such as using false documents, entering the country
without documentation, or working without documentation.” (Sec.
102 ((b)(19)).
Guidelines for assuring the protection
of trafficked persons are discussed in more detail below, and are also enumerated
in two documents:
The
Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights and
Human Trafficking,
issued by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (2002) and
The NGO-created Human
Rights Standards for the Treatment of Trafficked Persons by the Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women, Foundation
Against
Trafficking in Women and the International Human Rights Law
Group (1999).
Legislation on Prostitution / Commercial
Sex Work
The UN Trafficking Protocol deliberately
left the terms “exploitation of the prostitution of others” and “sexual exploitation”
undefined. This was necessary to achieve consensus among the signatory countries.
It allowed for the existence of different domestic law and policy on adult
sex work. The Trafficking Protocol intentionally does not take a position
on whether non-coerced adult sex work should be criminalized. There is currently
much debate over the issue of legalizing and regulating prostitution at the
national and international level.
Many advocates and activists argue
that all forms of prostitution exploit women and stem from structural inequalities
between women and men. Thus, the criminalization of “forced prostitution”
only implies that some forms of prostitution are legitimate and it gives sex
traffickers a defense to prosecution if they can prove the victim consented
to become a prostitute. Others advocate for a decriminalization of prostitution,
when it is entered into voluntarily, with economic and labor regulations applying.
Germany and the Netherlands have taken this approach.
Sweden’s approach is to outlaw the buying of
sexual services but not the selling. According to Swedish law,
it is a crime to purchase sex. In a 2002 recommendation by the
Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation
1545 (2002), the Council of Europe urges governments of member
States “to make trafficking in women or to knowingly use the services
of a woman victim of trafficking a criminal offence under national
law, and to strengthen legislation and enforcement mechanisms
which punish traffickers and clients of women who are victims
of trafficking.” Any legislation that addresses prostitution
or commercial sex work must be drafted in such a way to ensure
that trafficked persons are not prosecuted.
Guidelines on Victim Protection and Assistance
Effective anti-trafficking policies
include not only the prosecution of traffickers but also protecting the rights
of trafficked persons. International legal instruments, at both the UN and
European level, outline a broad range of interrelated measures that national
governments should undertake to protect and assist trafficking victims. While
much effort has been made to harmonize criminal legislation and facilitate
cooperation of law enforcement agencies across borders, the same is not necessarily
true for the provision of victim services. As Ann Jordan, Director of the
Initiative Against Trafficking in Persons of the International Human Rights
Law Group, points out “the [UN] Trafficking Protocol treats law enforcement
as a shared responsibility of all governments but it treats victim issues
as the individual responsibility of governments.” At the regional level,
however, organizations like the Stability Pact Task Force on Trafficking have
called upon governments of European countries to focus on protection of trafficked
persons through a “regional network of counter-measures,” which would involve
cross-border communication and cooperation.
The range of recommended measures
is extensive, and advocates who are working to create legislation on the provision
of services should analyze the specific needs of victims in the country.
There are, however, general guidelines about victim protection and assistance
that should be incorporated into any draft laws.
Victim Protection and Immigration Law
First, domestic legislation should ensure that
all trafficked persons, not just those who act as witnesses,
are afforded protection. The UN Trafficking Protocol makes no
distinction between trafficked persons who act as witnesses and
those who do not in its provisions regarding State obligations
to protect trafficking victims. (Article 6). The U.S. anti-trafficking
law, the Victims
of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, states
that victims of severe forms of trafficking are eligible for certain
protections. (Sec. 107). Regulations explaining the Trafficking
Act, the Interim
Rule on Protection and Assistance for Victims of Trafficking
(28 CFR Part 1100) state, however, that the Trafficking Act “requires
that all victims of severe forms of trafficking in persons be
protected while in federal custody. . . . victims of severe forms
of trafficking in persons who are potential witnesses to trafficking
in persons and whom federal law enforcement officials seek to
keep in this country in order to prosecute traffickers also receive
necessary protections, even when the victims are not in custody.”
This language could be interpreted to exclude those trafficking
victim who could not assist in the prosecution of traffickers.
Victim protection should also include
the protection of the trafficked person’s privacy and assurance of confidentiality.
The UN Trafficking Protocol obligates States “in appropriate cases and to
the extent possible under domestic law, . . . [to] protect the privacy and
identity of victims of trafficking in persons, including, inter alia,
by making legal proceedings relating to such trafficking confidential.” (Article
6). When victims’ identities are revealed, they are placed in danger of retaliation
by the trafficker. One likely scenario is that the government reveals the
names of trafficked persons when they are deported, if such information is
made public record. Furthermore, in cases when victims must be identified,
as in the case of victims who testify or otherwise aid in prosecution, the
Initiative Against Trafficking in Persons of the International Human Rights
Law Group recommends that the government be prepared to grant residency to
the victims and, in some cases, to family members as long the risk of retaliation
exists.
The ability of a government to provide
protection for victims is closely connected with how the trafficked person
is viewed under domestic immigration law. When victims are deported from
a destination country as a result of having violated immigration laws, their
safety cannot be assured. Such victims may be re-trafficked or harmed by
traffickers in retaliation. In addition, many victims face serious risk if
they are returned home or to their country of origin. Victims of trafficking
can be granted some level of protection through immigration policies that
allow them to remain in the destination country. The OSCE recommends that
States refrain from immediate expulsion of trafficked persons based on their
irregular residence status. Instead, States are urged to grant victims at
least temporary residence permits, without regard to whether the victim agrees
to give testimony in criminal proceedings. In particularly dangerous situations,
permanent residency may be warranted. The U.S. anti-trafficking law, the
Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, is an example
of legislation that includes provisions for temporary residence. The Victims
of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act amends the U.S. Immigration and
Nationality Act, creating the T and U visa categories, which do not confer
immigrant status but allow victims of trafficking to remain in the U.S. temporarily
with the possibility of lawful permanent residence status in the future.
The T and U visas differ in scope and availability.
In brief, to be eligible for a T
visa, the victim must meet at least following requirements:
- The
trafficked person is a victim of “severe forms of trafficking” defined
as
(1) “sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force,
fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has
not attained 18 years of age;” or
(2) “the recruitment,
harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for labor or
services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of
subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery.”
-
The trafficked person
is present in the U.S.
-
The trafficked person
is under 15 years of age or has complied with a request
to assist in the prosecution of trafficking
-
The trafficked person
would suffer extreme hardship involving unusual and serious
harm if removed from the U.S.
In brief, to be eligible for a U
visa, the victim must meet at least following requirements:
- The trafficked person
is a victim of one or more of the following or similar
activity in violation of U.S. Federal, state or local law: rape,
torture, torture, trafficking (but
not “severe form of trafficking”), incest, domestic
violence, sexual assault or abusive sexual contact,
prostitution or sexual exploitation, being held
hostage (including involuntary servitude), kidnapping,
abduction, unlawful criminal restraint, false imprisonment,
blackmail, manslaughter, assault
-
The trafficked person
suffered abuse because of a crime committed in the U.S.
-
The trafficked person
possesses information about the criminal activity
-
The trafficked person
would suffer extreme hardship involving unusual and
serious harm if removed from the U.S.
-
There must be certification
from a law enforcement official that the trafficked
person “has been helpful,
is being helpful, or is likely to be helpful” in the investigation or prosecution
the criminal activity
An alternative basis for providing protection
for victims of trafficking is to recognize their status as grounds
for asylum. The interconnections between trafficking, smuggling
and asylum policy are currently a topic of debate within the European
Union. In recent years, the European Union has been undergoing
a process of harmonizing its asylum procedures for member States.
Differences still exist, however, in the types of benefits that
asylum applications receive in EU countries, but generally changes
in asylum law have aimed at tightening regulations to limit the
number of asylum seekers. Human rights activists have argued
that these regulations have neither enhanced refugee protection
not resolved the problem of trafficking in Europe, but instead
undermine existing human rights standards, including the right
to asylum. A recent UNHCR Working Paper, The Trafficking and
Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game in European Asylum Policy?
identifies three possible connections between trafficking and
asylum- meaning, that refugees become involved with traffickers
or involvement in the trafficking process itself can give rise
to an asylum claim:
(1) Traffickers target vulnerable
group, such as refugees in camps, many of which are women and children. The
International Organization for Migration reported that traffickers in organized
criminal groups abducted young women from refugee camps in Albania during
the conflict in the former Yugoslavia, with the intention of forcing them
into prostitution in Western Europe.
(2) Because refuges, or persons who
have suffered persecution, have few options to leave their home country, they
may engage the services of a trafficker, knowingly or unknowingly, at the
beginning of the journey or while in transition.
(3) The trafficked person may qualify
for refugee status on the ground of persecution inherent in trafficking.
This scenario is particularly likely to occur in the case of women who are
trafficked into forced prostitution.
From UNHCR Working Paper,
The Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game in
European Asylum Policy? by John Morrison and Beth Crosland,
April 2001 (No. 29). This paper can be accessed from the UNHCR
website under “Research,” “Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Unit,” and “New Issues in Refugee Research.” A pre-publication
version of this paper is also available through the website
of the European Council on Refugees and Exiles.
From UNHCR Working Paper,
The
Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game in European
Asylum Policy? by John Morrison and Beth Crosland, UNHCR Policy
Research Unit, April 2001 (No. 29).
Victim Assistance
The obligation of national governments
to provide services to assist victims of trafficking is set forth by the United
Nations and at the European level. International legal documents call for
the provision of housing, medical and psychological aid, legal assistance
and employment or vocational training, if necessary. The extent to which
the government must provide such services is not prescribed, but generally
trafficking victims should be offered assistance that is comparable to that
which would be required by a victim of other forms of gender-based violence,
such as domestic violence. The UN Trafficking Protocol anticipates that there
is variation across countries as to the extent to which services can be offered
and thus its provisions are to be implemented progressively, to the greatest
extent possible.
Anti-corruption legislation
Trafficking is greatly facilitated
in many countries by corrupt government officials. In some cases, individual
government agents, such as border guards, police officers or court officials,
participate in or benefit directly from trafficking. Government corruption
may take the form of receiving bribes from traffickers or profits from the
trafficking industry, cooperation with traffickers or refusing to provide
trafficking victims with assistance. An effective anti-trafficking policy
at the domestic level must include laws under which to prosecute corrupt officials
and mechanisms by which corruption can be investigated. For example, the
creation of internal affairs departments within the government structure is
an example of a policy change. The prosecution of members of the government
who are found to have been complicit in trafficking, either under existing
criminal laws or specific trafficking laws, is also vital in prevent trafficking.
Trafficking in Women: Law and Policy | The
International Legal Framework | Regional
Law and Standards | List of Law
and Policy Documents
|
|