by the Government of Mauritius to the concluding observations
of the Human Rights Committee on the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Northern Ireland and Overseas Territories
1. By letter dated 3 January 2002, the Permanent Representative of Mauritius
to the United Nations Office at Geneva transmitted to the Chairman of
the Human Rights Committee the comments of the Mauritius authorities on
paragraph 38 of the advance unedited version of the concluding observations
of the Human Rights Committee: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland (CCPR/CO/73/UK, CCPR/CO/73/UKOT dated 5 November 2001), released
by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, in which mention
is made of the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT).
2. The Government of the Republic of Mauritius wishes to submit the following
clarifications to the members of the Human Rights Committee.
3. Mauritius consists mainly of an island of 720 square miles found in
the south-west of the Indian Ocean and which has a population of 1.2 million.
4. Mauritius obtained its independence from the United Kingdom on 12 March
1968. Prior to Mauritius being granted its independence, the Chagos Archipelago
was unlawfully excised by the United Kingdom from the territory of Mauritius.
This excision was done in violation of the United Nations Declaration
on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples (General
Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960) prohibiting the dismemberment
of any colonial territory prior to independence, and Assembly resolutions
2066 (XX) of 16 December 1965, 2232 (XXI) of 20 December 1966 and 2357
(XXII) of 19 December 1967. It should be noted that paragraph 6 of the
Declaration stipulates that "Any attempt aimed at the partial or
total disruption of national unity and the territorial integrity of a
country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter
of the United Nations".
5. The Chagos Archipelago had always been under the administrative rule
of Mauritius until its unlawful excision by the then colonial power. Mauritius
has never relinquished its sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago and
has, ever since this unlawful excision, consistently and persistently
pressed the United Kingdom Government both in bilateral and multilateral
forums for the early and unconditional return of the Chagos Archipelago
6. In this context, the Government of Mauritius has continuously received
the support of the Organization of African Unity and the Non-Aligned Movement
on this issue. Only recently, the OAU Council of Ministers meeting in
Lusaka in July 2001 reiterated its unflinching support to the Government
of Mauritius in its endeavours and efforts to restore its sovereignty
over the Chagos Archipelago and called upon the United Kingdom to put
an end to its continued unlawful occupation of the Chagos Archipelago
and to return it to Mauritius, thereby completing the process of decolonization.
The OAU Council further exhorted the United Kingdom authorities not to
take any steps or measures likely to adversely impact on the sovereignty
7. Mauritius also reiterates its request every year at the United Nations
General Assembly for the return of the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius.
In accordance with article 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, Mauritius has repeatedly called for the former inhabitants
of the Chagos Archipelago and their families, who were forcibly evicted
to Mauritius by the then colonial power, to be allowed to return to the
Archipelago, including Diego Garcia. At the General Assembly in November
2001, Mauritius reiterated its claim of sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago.
8. The Mauritian Government therefore does not recognize any British Indian
Ocean Territory (BIOT) or any British Overseas Territory (BOT) insofar
as those terms purport to describe or refer to the Chagos Archipelago.
The Mauritius Government continues to vehemently challenge the competence
of the British Government or any other Government to legislate for a part
of Mauritian territory which is and has always been under Mauritian sovereignty
and intends to take measures to vindicate its right at all relevant places
9. Whenever the Chagos issue has been raised, Her Majesty's Government
in the United Kingdom has maintained that sovereignty over the Chagos
Archipelago will revert to Mauritius when the military facility on Diego
Garcia is no longer needed for the defence of the West. Indeed, in a letter
dated 1 July 1992 addressed to the Mauritian authorities, the British
authorities gave an undertaking to the Government of Mauritius that when
the Chagos would no longer be needed for the defence purposes of the United
Kingdom and the United States, it will be ceded to Mauritius.
10. Mauritius is still pursuing the resolution of this issue through diplomatic
means and has sought the support of the United States to that end. The
Mauritius authorities will, however, remain vigilant with regard to any
attempt from any quarter likely to cause an adverse impact on the sovereignty
11. The Government of Mauritius would be grateful if the Office of the
High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Human Rights Committee could
consider the foregoing elements when finalizing the documents under reference.