COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION
OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
Forty-second session
CONSIDERATION
OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES
UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION
Concluding observations of the Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination
Ukraine
42. The eleventh and
twelfth reports of Ukraine (CERD/C/197/Add.5 and CERD/C/226/Add.3)
were considered by the Committee at its 958th, 959th and 983rd meetings,
held on 2 and 18 March 1993 (CERD/C/SR.958, 959 and 983).
43. The reports were
introduced by the representative of the State party, who provided
information on the legislation adopted in Ukraine since the submission
of its previous report. The Ukrainian Parliament had declared that
all laws adopted by the State to which Ukraine was the successor
would remain in force as long as they were not in contradiction
with new legislation. All obligations entered into by Ukraine after
ratification by the Parliament had become an integral part of the
State's domestic law.
44. The representative
indicated that since the submission of the previous report, 122
acts and 336 decrees or legislative texts concerning the Convention
had been adopted. These included, in particular, the Act on the
Rehabilitation of Victims of Political Repression in Ukraine; the
Act relating to the security services; the Act on Citizens' Associations;
the Act on National Minorities in Ukraine; the Employment Act; and
the Act on Citizenship of Ukraine.
45. The representative
informed the Committee that as part of judicial reform a constitutional
court had been set up to rule on the constitutionality of laws and
other legislative acts. Under the Constitution, the Parliamentary
Ombudsman for Human Rights was vested with the power to refer matters
to the Constitutional Court in cases where the State had interfered
with the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens.
46. However, despite
all the legislative measures adopted by Ukraine, human rights violations
on national or religious grounds, as well as conflicts between national
groups, did occur at times. The complex situation in which Ukraine
currently found itself, characterized by hyperinflation and a dramatic
drop in the standard of living, created tensions which, when combined
with national, religious and other factors, might give rise to conflicts
or human rights violations. The Ukrainian authorities, at both the
national and local levels, were trying to reduce friction between
nationalities; as a result Ukraine was free from large-scale open
conflict between different groups.
47.
Members of the Committee welcomed the timely submission by
Ukraine of its twelfth report,
which included useful information on recent changes in the country.
However, while it provided a good overall view of the present
situation,
the report contained some extraneous material and did not always
specify exactly the extent to which the Convention was being
implemented.
They asked the delegation whether the provisions of the Convention
were directly applicable in a court of law; what the situation
was
with respect to the envisaged establishment of German colonies
on Ukrainian territory; whether Ukraine planned to conclude
agreements
with other countries on the rights of minorities such as the
one it had signed with Hungary in May 1991; and whether Jewish
emigration
from Ukraine was continuing and, if so, whether the persons concerned
emigrated without passports and why. Further information was requested
about the situation in Crimea, in particular demographic data on
the size of each population group in 1920, 1940 and 1990, and on
the content of the Act on the Status of the Crimean Autonomous Republic.
Members were concerned that the human rights of the population of
Pridnestrovye had been violated and that the Crimean Tartar problem
had not yet been solved. They also wished to know whether there
was an accepted definition of the term "minority" in Ukraine
and, if so, whether it covered national as well as ethnic, religious
or linguistic minorities.
48. With respect to
article 2 of the Convention, members of the Committee asked what
the Government of Ukraine was doing to encourage integrationist
multiracial organizations and movements. They indicated, with reference
to article 2.1 of the Convention, that the policy adopted by a State
party with regard to the elimination of racial discrimination should
be set down in a clear and comprehensive written document which
should be brought to the attention of the public and of the persons
responsible for the implementation of the policy.
49. Concerning article
3 of the Convention, members of the Committee wished to have more
detailed information about the country's attitude with regard to
the sanctions against South Africa. They asked whether Ukraine was
in favour of maintaining those sanctions and whether it had diplomatic
relations with South Africa.
50. With regard to article
4 of the Convention, members of the Committee indicated that although
the Convention had been incorporated into Ukrainian domestic law,
legislation still had to be enacted to implement the punitive provisions
of article 4. In that connection, they noted that a new version
of article 66 of the Criminal Code neither prohibited racist organizations
nor prevented official bodies from engaging in racial discrimination.
51. With respect to
article 5 of the Convention, members of the Committee wished to
know more about the rights of individuals belonging to the various
ethnic groups; how those groups took part in the executive and legislative
powers and, if such participation was provided for by law, whether
there were any quotas; whether Ukraine authorized the formation
of political parties based on ethnic origin; and what the position
was of the Ukrainian legislature regarding dual citizenship.
52. With reference to
article 6 of the Convention, members asked how it had been possible
that, in 1991, no one had been convicted under article 66 of the
Criminal Code; whether any complaints of racial discrimination had
been brought; and whether the public was sufficiently aware of article
66. Members noted that the three-year limit for the submission of
compensation claims by victims of repression by the previous regime
was too short.
53. Concerning article
7 of the Convention, members of the Committee noted that the section
of the report dealing with the implementation of that article did
not contain sufficient information. Members of the Committee wanted
to know exactly what steps Ukraine was taking in the areas of teaching,
education, culture and information to combat prejudice which gave
rise to racial discrimination and, more generally, to give effect
to article 7 of the Convention.
54. With respect to
article 14 of the Convention, members of the Committee particularly
welcomed the fact that Ukraine had recognized the competence of
the Committee to receive and to consider communications from individuals
or groups of individuals claiming to be victims of a violation of
any of the rights set forth in the Convention.
55. The representative
of the State party, replying to the questions asked and comments
made by members of the Committee, said that the views of the members
of the Committee would be an important factor in future efforts
by the Government to establish conditions for the implementation
of the provisions of the Convention. The way in which reports were
considered by the Committee enabled States parties to consider their
domestic legislation from a more critical standpoint and to remedy
shortcomings.
56. He further stated
that as a result of the ratification by Ukraine of international
human rights instruments, those instruments had been incorporated
into Ukrainian law and could be invoked in courts of law. However,
rules of principle could not be applied automatically or directly
unless they were supported by the necessary practical machinery
for their implementation, and a great deal of domestic legislation
still had to be adopted for that purpose. In regard to demographic
data, that information would be provided in table form in the next
periodic report.
57.
The representative provided the Committee with detailed information
on the issues relating
to the Crimea and the Pridnestrovye region, emphasizing that
the problem of Crimea was based not on issues of nationality
or race,
but rather on political conflicts and that therefore it did not
come within the scope of the Convention. He explained the situation
with regard to emigration to Israel, indicating that, in spite
of
the efforts undertaken by the Government, emigration continued
because life was hard in Ukraine and the prospects of better
living conditions
always prompted departure. Individuals emigrating from Ukraine
maintained their right to Ukrainian citizenship and kept their
Ukrainian passports.
The representative further explained that article 1 of the Ukrainian
law on nationality had maintained the rule set forth in the
Constitution
of the former Soviet Union granting a single nationality to the
inhabitants of Ukraine. However, dual citizenship could be
granted
on the basis of intergovernmental agreements and the Russian
Federation and Ukraine were currently engaged in negotiations
to that end.
58. Under the Act on
National Minorities, Ukraine had established a special ministry
at the national level for dealing with the problems of national
groups. In addition, it was also possible to form voluntary advisory
bodies made up of representatives of national minorities. The Act
defined a national minority as a group of Ukrainian citizens who
were not Ukrainian by nationality and who shared a sense of national
self-identification and community. According to that definition,
members of religious denominations, such as Catholics, or members
of linguistic minorities, were not considered national minorities.
59. With regard to article
3 of the Convention, the representative said that in March 1992
an agreement had been reached on the establishment of diplomatic
relations between Ukraine and the Republic of South Africa. At the
same time, Ukraine was fully committed to implementing the Security
Council decisions which had been taken with regard to South Africa.
60. Referring to article
5 of the Convention, the representative said that the problems of
religion and freedom of expression which had arisen were often due
to the dire economic situation and particularly to the very high
rate of inflation, rather than genuine religious discrimination.
He further stated that cultural organizations specific to an ethnic
group were permissible, but political parties based on ethnicity
were not legal since membership would necessarily be discriminatory.
Quotas for different nationalities in the Ukrainian Parliament had
existed in the past, but now all deputies were elected freely and
a wide range of nationalities were represented in the Parliament.
61. With respect to
article 6 of the Convention, the representative confirmed that there
had been no convictions under article 66 of the Criminal Code since
1991.
62. As far as article
7 of the Convention was concerned, the representative declared that
the Convention had been promulgated in the Gazette of the Supreme
Council, along with other human rights instruments. It had also
been translated into Ukrainian and could be found in libraries and
other places freely accessible to the public.
Concluding observations
63. The Committee commended
the regularity with which the Government of Ukraine had reported
on the implementation of the Convention, for the high quality of
its delegation's replies to questions and for its candour in acknowledging
deficiencies.
64. The Committee noted
the broad range of information provided in the twelfth periodic
report on historic changes taking place in Ukraine, its support
on the international scene for the protection of human rights and
especially national minorities, and its adoption of legal instruments
for developing democracy and strengthening the rule of law. It was
nevertheless felt that demographic data could have been presented
in a more illustrative way. Hope was expressed that the existing
situation of unrest there would be resolved with respect for human
rights and for the rights of ethnic minorities.