University of Minnesota

Conclusions and recommendations of the Committee against Torture, Austria, U.N. Doc. CAT/C/AUT/CO/3/CPR.1 (2005).



Thirty-fifth session
7-25 November 2005




Conclusions and recommendations of the Committee against Torture


1. The Committee considered the third periodic report of Austria (CAT/C/ 34/Add.18 ) at its 679 th and 680 th meetings (CAT/C/SR. 679 and 680), held on 16 and 17 November 2005, and adopted, at its 691 st meeting held on 24 November 2005, the following conclusions and recommendations.

A. Introduction

2. The Committee welcomes the submission of the third periodic report of Austria, which was prepared in accordance with the Committees guidelines. It notes, however, that the report was submitted with a three-year delay. The Committee appreciates the constructive dialogue with the high-level delegation and commends the comprehensive written responses provided to the list of issues, as well as the oral information provided by the State party’s delegation during the consideration of the report.

B. Positive aspects

3. The Committee welcomes the assurances of the State party regarding the relationship between observance of human rights standards and the fight against terrorism, that it will adhere strictly to the guidelines adopted in 2002 by the Council of Europe on human rights and the fight against terrorism and that it will work, during its presidency of the European Union (January-June 2006) to further strengthen the commitment towards the absolute nature of the prohibition of torture.

4. The Committee notes with satisfaction the ongoing efforts made by the State party to revise its legislation and adopt other necessary measures in order to ensure better protection of human rights and give effect to the Convention, including inter alia:


5. The Committee also welcomes:


C. Subjects of concern and recommendations


Definition of torture

6. Not withstanding the State party’s assertion that all acts that may be described as “torture” within the meaning of article 1 of the Convention are punishable under the Austrian Penal Code, the Committee observes that a definition of torture as provided by article 1 of the Convention is still not included in the Penal Code of the State party.

The Committee reiterates its previous recommendation (A/55/44, para. 50(a)) that the State party should establish adequate provisions in order to legally define torture in accordance with article 1 of the Convention, and criminalize it in accordance with article 4, paragraph 2 of the Convention.


7. The Committee is concerned about information revealing that the new Asylum Law, which entered into force on May 2004, could increase the risk of refugees being sent to supposed safe third countries, that asylum seekers could be deported before a decision on their appeal has been taken and the limited possibility of presenting new evidence during the hearing.

Since the Constitutional Court has declared some of the Act’s articles unconstitutional, the State party is requested to provide the Committee with information on the measures it intends to rectify this.

8. The Committee regrets the reported extraditions carried out by the State party after receiving diplomatic assurances from the requesting country.

The State party should provide the Committee with detailed information on cases of extradition or removal subject to receipt of diplomatic assurances since 1999. Additionally, the State party should provide the Committee with detailed information on cases of denial of extradition, return or expulsion due to the risk that the person might be subject to torture, ill-treatment or the death penalty.

9. The Committee is concerned by the limited guarantees of interrogation of women asylum seekers by female officers.

The State party should take the necessary measures to extend the guarantee that women asylum seekers will be interviewed by women officers in all instances.

Prompt and impartial investigation

10. The Committee expresses concern about the lack of prompt investigation of certain cases of torture and ill-treatment committed by law enforcement officials, as well as about the penalties imposed on perpetrators, in particular with reference to the case of death in custody in 2003 of Mr. Cheibani Wague. With regard to this case, the Committee notes with deep concern the following:

The State party should:

a) Ensure that criminal complaints regarding torture and ill-treatment lodged against its law enforcement authorities are resolved expeditiously;

b) Inform the Committee weather an appeal was lodged by the Public Prosecutor and of the result of the appeal.

Review of interrogation rules, instructions, methods and practices

11. The Committee is concerned about the restrictions on the right of an arrested person to have a counsel present during interrogation if “there is some evidence to suggest that the presence of a counsel would jeopardise further investigative steps”.

a) The Committee urges the State party to take all necessary legal and administrative guarantees to ensure that this restriction will not be misused, that it should be restricted to very serious crimes and that it should always be authorized by a judge.

b) The State party should provide in its next periodic report additional information concerning the standardization of interrogation techniques of persons in police custody and the implementation of new techniques, particularly the use of video-recording of interrogations, which the Committee encourages the State party to continue but not as an alternative to the presence of a counsel. Additionally, the Committee requests details on the measures to monitor and evaluate the use of the referred techniques.

12. The Committee is particularly concerned about the inadequacy of the legal aid system.

The Committee urges the State party to implement the recommendations of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment to establish a fully fledged and properly funded system of legal aid.

13. The Committee is concerned by the reported physical presence of police officers during medical examinations of persons in police custody.

The State party should take appropriate measures to ensure that police officers are not present during medical examinations of persons under police custody in order to guarantee the confidentiality of medical information; save under exceptional and justifiable circumstances (i.e. risk of physical aggression).

14. The Committee is concerned about the conditions of detention of juveniles, particularly that separation of persons under 18 in places of detention is not strictly observed.

The State party should:

a) Develop alternative measures of detention for juveniles;

b) Ensure strict separation of juveniles and adults in places of detention;

c) Take preventive measures to avoid physical ill-treatment of juvenile detainees, including adequate training of officers dealing with juveniles;

d) Deliver clear instructions from senior officers, both oral and written, that abusive conduct toward juveniles will not be tolerated.

Prevention of acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment

15. The Committee is concerned about the reported attitude of racism and intolerance towards foreigners by some law enforcement officials, such as cases of verbal abuses towards Roma and people of African descent.

a) The State party should continue its vigilance to ensure that the relevant existing legal and administrative measures are strictly observed and that training curricula and administrative directives constantly communicate to the staff the message that verbal and physical ill-treatment will not be tolerated, will be sanctioned accordingly and that racial motivations will aggravate the offences.

b) The State party should provide the Committee with data on cases of torture and ill-treatment where the aggravating factors as stated in section 33 of the Austrian Criminal Code, including racism and xenophobia, have been invoked in the assessment of punishment of offences.

16. The Committee regrets the fact that for numerous areas covered by the Convention, the State party was unable to supply statistics, or appropriately disaggregate those supplied (e.g. by age, gender and/or ethnic group). During the current dialogue, this occurred with respect to, for example, cases of rejection of extradition requests for fear of torture, cases of expulsion of foreigners and countries where asylum seekers have been returned. The State Party was also unable to provide detailed information on cases of sexual violence and on investigations, prosecution and punishment of perpetrators of such violations.

The State party should take measures as may be necessary to ensure that its competent authorities, as well as the Committee, are fully appraised of these details when assessing the State party's compliance with its obligations under the Convention.

17. The Committee notes with concern the reported delay of Provincial (Länder) authorities in adapting their legislation and administrative framework to implement measures taken at the federal level with the aim to enhance compliance with the Convention. The Committee is particularly concerned that, owing to perceived constitutional difficulties arising from the division of powers between federal and provincial authorities of the State party, comprehensive federal provisions regarding basic needs of refugees, including health assistance, contained in the amended Federal Care Act (2005) as well as in the Agreement on Basic Support (2004) between the Federal Government and the Provinces, have until now been adopted by the authorities in only two Provinces.

a) The State party should provide the Committee with information about the status of enactment of appropriate legal provisions by the Provincial authorities regarding the protection of the basic needs of refugees.

b) Additionally, the State party should take such measures as appropriate to ensure that the basic needs of asylum seekers are not diminished as a result of the amended Federal Care Act of 2005.

Request for information

18. The Committee further recommends the following:

That the State party should submit information on the outcome of the criminal proceedings of the case of the Austrian CIVPOL officerwho was charged with serious ill-treatment of an ethnic Albanian detainee during his service under the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), the disciplinary measures taken during the proceedings and after, as well as on the eventual compensation to the alleged victim.

19. The Committee encourages the State party to continue to contribute to the United Nations Voluntary Fund for the Victims of Torture, as it has done in the past.

20. The State party is encouraged to disseminate widely the reports submitted by Austria to the Committee and the conclusions and recommendations, in appropriate languages, through official websites, the media and non-governmental organizations.

21. The Committee requests the State party to provide, within one year, information on its response to the Committee’s recommendations contained in paragraphs 7, 8, 10(b), 12, 15(b) and 17(a) above.

22. The State party is invited to submit its next periodic report, which will be considered as the combined fourth and fifth report, by 31 December 2008, the due date of the fifth periodic report.




Home || Treaties || Search || Links