Dismissed Congressional Employees v. Peru, Case 11.830 and 12.038, Report No. 52/00, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.111 Doc. 20 rev. at 335 (2000).
REPORT Nº
52/00
CASES 11.830 and 12.038
DISMISSED CONGRESSIONAL EMPLOYEES
PERU
June
15, 2001
I.
SUMMARY
1.
The instant report on admissibility covers Cases 11.830 and 12.038,
which have been combined because
they concern the same events, namely the dismissal of a group of 257 employees
of the National Congress of the Republic of Peru (hereinafter Peru,
the State or the Peruvian State), who attempted,
by means of domestic legal remedies, to impugn two executive decisions
issued in 1992, whereby a total of 1,117 employees of that Congress were
dismissed. The petitioners claim that Peru violated, to the detriment
of the aforementioned 257 dismissed employees, who pursued the remedies
under domestic law, the rights to a fair trial and judicial protection
enshrined in Articles 8 and 25
of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter the Convention
or the American Convention). The State contended that the
case was inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies. The Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter the Commission, the
Inter-American Commission or the IACHR) considers that
the situation that must be taken into account, in order to determine if
domestic remedies have been exhausted, is that which exists at the moment
of adopting a decision on admissibility, and decides to admit the petitions
as regards the alleged violations of the rights to a fair trial and to
judicial protection enshrined in Articles 8 and 25, respectively, of the
American Convention on Human Rights, without prejudging the merits of
the matter.
II.
PROCESSING BY THE COMMISSION
2.
The petition relating to Case 11.830, originally lodged as an application
for precautionary measures by Messrs. Adolfo Fernández Sare, Angela Valdéz
Rivera, Roberto Ribotte Rodríguez, María Huaranga Soto, and Manuel Carranza
Rodríguez, both in their own name, and on behalf of other dismissed congressional
employees, was received by the IACHR on October 18, 1997. The Commission
opened the case on November 10, 1997, transmitted the pertinent portions
of the petition to the State, and requested it for information to be submitted
within a period of 90 days. Peru
replied on January 26, 1998. On March 26, 1998, the petitioners lodged
a petition with the Commission that reproduced the alleged facts contained
in the original application for precautionary measures, as well as submitting
a copy of a judgment delivered by the Constitutional Court on November
24, 1997, published in the
official gazette, El Peruano, on January 12, 1998.
3. On February 4,
1999, Pedro Antonio Quiñones Seminario and Augusto Salomón Bellindo Orihuela,
both former congressional employees asked to named as co-petitioners in
the case. Both parties submitted additional information and observations
on different occasions. In a communication of October 20, 1999, the Bar
Association of Lima asked to be named as co-petitioner in the case and
presented letters from various former congressional employees requesting
that they be represented by the said Bar Association in Case 11.830 before
the IACHR.
4.
In addition, the petition relating to Case 12.038 was received
by the IACHR on July 10, 1998. That petition was lodged by Messrs. Zoila
Luz Begazo Salazar, Jorge Luis Pacheco Munayco, and 19 other persons,
acting both in their own name and on behalf of other employees dismissed
from the Congress. The Commission
opened the case on August 4,
1998, transmitted the pertinent portions of the petition to the Peruvian
State, and requested it for information to be submitted within a period
of 90 days. Peru applied
for an extension in which to respond and, this granted, did so on November
11, 1998. On June 28, 1999, the Commission received an amicus
curiae brief from the National Ombudsman [of Peru].
5.
On June 9, 2000, the Commission, in accordance with the provisions
set forth in Article 40(2) of its Regulations, combined the petitions
relating to Cases 11.830 and 12.038, and decided to continue to hear them
in the proceedings in Case 11.830. At the same time, the IACHR advised
both Peru and all of the petitioners of that fact.
II.
POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES
A.
Position of the petitioners
6.
The petitioners claim that on April 5, 1992, the head of the Executive
Branch of the Peruvian Government, Alberto Fujimori, ordered the dissolution
of Congress and the complete reorganization of the Judicial Branch, the
Constitutional Court, the National Judiciary Council, the Office of the
Attorney General, and the Office of the Inspector General. The petitioners
assert that such a situation led to the arbitrary removal of officials
and employees who had been appointed to their posts in accordance with
regulations that predated April 5, 1992.
7.
The petitioners say that the congressional personnel were laid
off from their jobs by Executive Decisions Nos. 1303-A-92-CACL and 1303-B-92-CACL,
which provided for the dismissal of a total of 1,117 congressional employees
and were published on December 31, 1992, in the official gazette, El
Peruano. They claim that the dismissal was carried out without the
least respect for the guarantees of due process, and that it was totally
arbitrary inasmuch as it was not supported by any of the grounds provided
for in the regulations in force at the time.
8.
The petitioners say that a group of 234 former congressional employees
filed an amparo suit appealing
the aforesaid executive decisions, which was heard by the 28th Civil Court
of Lima. By judgment of June 26, 1995, that court upheld the petition
and ordered that the employees who instituted the aforesaid proceeding
be reinstated in their jobs.
9.
The petitioners say that the Fifth Chamber for Civil Matters of
the Superior Court of Lima, on hearing the appeal filed against the lower
court decision, delivered a new judgment on February 21, 1996, and reversed
the decision of the lower court. The petitioners filed a special appeal
[recurso extraordinario] with
the Constitutional Court against that judgment. At the time the petition
was lodged with the Commission, a decision was pending on the appeal.
10.
The petitioners say that the Constitutional Court issued a decision
on November 24, 1997, that was published in the official gazette, "El
Peruano," on January 12, 1998, and upheld the judgment of the appellate
court. In the course of the trial other employees had joined the amparo
suit, with the upshot that the above decision of the Constitutional Court
finally applied to the 257 employees whose names are mentioned in the
annex to the instant report. The petitioners add that the evidence they
presented to the Constitutional Court was not accorded its due value.
They mention their disagreement with the legal reasoning used in the above-mentioned
judgment of the appellate court and in the aforesaid decision of the Constitutional
Court, and declared that it amounted overall to a violation of the rights
to a fair trial and judicial protection recognized in Articles 8 and 25
of the American Convention. They say that the Constitutional Court was
not and impartial tribunal, due to the removal of three of its members
by the Congress, and to the fact that the remaining judges of that court
lacked the requisite independence and impartiality to hear the case.
B.
Position of the State
11.
With respect to Case 11.830, the State claimed that the proceedings
in connection with the amparo suit brought by the petitioners were continuing
before the Constitutional Court, and that the delay in reaching a decision
was due to the need to safeguard the procedural guarantees of the parties
involved. The State added that the claimants acted improperly in appealing
to international jurisdiction, when there were available to them suitable
procedural mechanisms under domestic law for challenging any acts or decisions
that threaten or injure fundamental rights.
12.
With regard to the formal requirements for its admission, the State
said that petition lodged by the petitioners had to be examined independently
of their initial application for precautionary measures. The State claimed
that the allegations made in the petition are unfounded. As to violation
of the guarantee of due process, the State maintained that the petitioners
did not during the proceedings before the courts file any action designed
to stop the alleged violation of due process.
Accordingly, the Peruvian State considered that the failure to
pursue the remedies provided by domestic law resulted in the loss of the
right to petition the IACHR.
13. The
State argued that in the domestic sphere the Peruvian state has undergone
a process of modernization and that, more specifically, the Congress has
been redesigned, which has led to a 50% reduction in the overall number
of members of Congress and the axing of a large number of jobs.
14.
The State held that the petition is inadmissible inasmuch as domestic
remedies had not been exhausted at the time it was lodged.
15. As to Case 12.038,
the State requested its joinder to Case 11.830, since both concerned the
same events and the same allegedly injured persons.
III.
ANALYSIS
A.
The Commissions Competence ratione
personae, ratione materiae and ratione
temporis
16.
Under Article 44 of the American Convention the petitioners are
entitled to lodge petitions with the IACHR.[1]
Those petitions name as alleged victims individuals, in respect of whom
Peru undertook to respect and ensure the rights enshrined in the Convention.[2]
Insofar as the State is concerned, the Commission observes that Peru became
a state party to the American Convention upon ratifying it on July 28,
1978. Accordingly, the Commission is competent ratione
personae to examine the petitions.
17.
The Commission is also competent ratione
materiae and ratione temporis,
inasmuch as the facts alleged in the respective petitions tend to establish
violations of rights protected by the American Convention, and by reason
of that fact that the events in question have purportedly occurred during
or after 1992, when the duty to respect and ensure the rights recognized
in the Convention was in force for the Peruvian State.
B.
Admissibility requirements for the petition
a.
Exhaustion of domestic remedies
18.
The Peruvian State claims that the petition in Case 11.830, received
by the IACHR on October 18, 1997, was lodged prior to exhaustion of the
remedies under domestic law. The decision of the Constitutional Court,
which -both parties agree- exhausted the remedies under domestic law,
was issued on November 24, 1997, and published on January 12, 1998.
19.
In respect of the above, the Commission observes that the aforementioned
petition was indeed lodged prior to exhaustion of the remedies under domestic
law. Such a circumstance, however, is not stand in the way of its admissibility
at the current stage of the case. The admissibility requirements to be
met by a petition must be examined, generally speaking, at the moment
at which the Commission pronounces on its admissibility. Article 46 of
the Convention states that [A]dmission
by the Commission of a petition or communication lodged in accordance
with Articles 44 or 45 shall be subject to the following requirements:
a) that the remedies under domestic law have been pursued and exhausted
in accordance with generally recognized principles of international law.
With respect to the foregoing, the moment of lodging a petition is distinct
from that of pronouncement on its admissibility. Article 33 of the Regulations
of the IACHR, for instance, authorizes the Commission to ask
the petitioner to complete the requirements omitted in the petition, should
the Commission consider that the petition is inadmissible or incomplete.
20.
To accept the argument of Peru to the effect that the aforementioned
petition is allegedly inadmissible, inasmuch as at the moment it was lodged
the remedies under domestic law had not been exhausted, in spite of the
fact that at the present instance, as the Commission is pronouncing on
admissibility, those remedies have been exhausted, would imply a formalistic
decision totally at odds with the protection of the human rights enshrined
in the Convention. Such a decision would also leave the alleged victims
in a state of defenselessness, since the Commission would probably be
unable to examine their case, even were a new petition concerning the
same events to be lodged in the future. The Inter-American Court of Human
Rights has held that [I]t is generally accepted that the procedural
system is a means of attaining justice and that the latter cannot be sacrificed
for the sake of mere formalities.
21.
The Commission concludes that the situation that must be taken
into consideration in order to determine if the remedies under domestic
law have been exhausted is that which exists at the moment of adopting
a decision on admissibility. Consequently, the Commission finds that the
requirement of exhaustion of the remedies under domestic law provided
in Article 46 (1) (a) of the American Convention was met with the decision
of the Constitutional Court issued on November 24, 1997, and published
on January 12, 1998.
22.
With respect to the petition in Case 12.038, the Commission observes
that said petition was lodged on July 10, 1998, by which date the remedies
under domestic law had been duly exhausted.
b.
Filing Period
23.
The Commission finds that in Case 11.830 the petition was lodged
prior to the date of the decision that exhausted domestic remedies, whereas
in Case 12.038 the petition was received by the IACHR on July 10, 1998,
in other words, before six months had elapsed following publication, on
January 12, 1998, of the decision of the Constitutional Court that exhausted
the remedies under domestic law. Therefore, the requirement established
in Article 46 (1) (b) of the American Convention has been met.
c.
Duplication of proceedings and res
judicata
24.
The Commission finds that the subject of the petition is not pending
in another international proceeding for settlement, nor is the petition
substantially the same as one previously studied by the Commission or
by another international organization.
Accordingly, the requirements set forth in Articles 46 (1) (c)
and 47 (d) have also been met.
d.
Nature of the violations
25.
The
Commission believes that the facts alleged by the petitioners, if proven
true, could constitute violations of rights protected by the American
Convention.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
26.
The
Commission concludes that it is competent to take up the petitions under
review, and that, pursuant to Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention,
said
petitions are admissible
in the terms set out above.
27.
Based
on the factual and legal arguments given above, and without prejudging
the merits of the case,
THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION
ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECIDES:
1.
To declare the above-mentioned petitions admissible as regards
the alleged violations of the rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection
protected in Articles 8 and 25, respectively, of the American Convention
on Human Rights, without prejudging the merits of the matter.
2.
To
notify the petitioners and the State of this decision;
3.
To
continue with its analysis of the merits of the case;
4. To
publish this decision and to include it in its Annual Report to the OAS
General Assembly.
Done
and signed at Brasilia, Brazil, on this the 15th day of June
2000. Signed: Hélio Bicudo,
Chair; Claudio Grossman, First Vice Chair; Juan Méndez, Second Vice Chair;
Commission Members: Marta
Altolaguirre, Robert K. Goldman, Peter Laurie and Julio Prado Vallejo.
[1] Without prejudice to its authority to pronounce on this
point in its decision on the merits, the IACHR finds that in the case
under review the legal standing of the petitioners has not been questioned.
[2]
In light of the fact that both the petition in Case 11.830 and that
in Case 12.038 specifically name a number of ‑persons, while adding
the phrase and others, and that while processing the case
the IACHR has received from the petitioners various lists of names of
alleged victims, as well as having also received joinder applications
from other persons asking to be named as alleged victims, the IACHR
regards as alleged victims all the persons covered by the decision of
the Constitutional Court of November 24, 1997, who are specifically
named in the annex to the instant report. The foregoing without prejudice
to holding as alleged victims the respective relatives of the deceased
persons who are on that list, or diminishing such decisions as the IACHR
might adopt in respect of other incidents that might arise.
ANNEX
TO REPORT N° 52/00
CASES 11.830 AND 12.038
DISMISSED CONGRESSIONAL EMPLOYEES
PERU
LIST OF PERSONS COVERED BY THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF NOVEMBER 24, 1997, WHO ARE REGARDED AS ALLEGED VICTIMS IN THE RECORD CONTAINING CASES 11.830 AND 12.038 BEFORE THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS.
1. Aguado Alfaro,
José |
48. Chávez García, Bladimir |
95. Gonzáles Panuera, Luis |
2. Aguilar Rojas,
Felix |
49. Cherrez Córdova,
Rosa |
96. Gonzáles Sánchez, Anabel Iris |
3. Aguilar Rojas,
Gisela |
50. Chino Villegas,
Wilfredo |
97. Grández Alvarado
César |
4. Albornoz Alva,
Luis Rodolfo |
51. Chipana Quispe, Tiburcio |
98. Guevara Gallo, Rodolfo |
5. Alcántara Ramos, Juana |
52. Chipana Rodríquez, Luis |
99. Guzmán Rebatta, Juan |
6. Aliaga Lama, Luis |
53. Cisneros Urbina,
Esther |
100. Hayasshi Bejarano, Folgges Luis
|
7. Alvarado Achicahuala, Juan |
54. Clerque Gonzáles, José |
101. Hernández
Fernández, Ricardo |
8. Alvarado Galván,
Eriberto Rodolfo |
55. Cobeñas Pariamache,
Felix |
102. Herrera Madueño, Caro |
9. Alvarado Suárez,
Mónica Lourdes |
56. Colán Villegas, Laura |
103. Herrera Rojas, Lucas |
10. Alvarez Gutiérrez, Marleni |
57. Condezo Espinoza, Antonio |
104. Herrera Valdez, Reynaldo |
11. Ampuero Ampuero, Victor |
58. Córdova Melgarejo,
Antonia Elizabeth |
105. Hijar Cerpa,
Andrés |
12. Angeles Ponte,
Nancy Violeta |
59. Cornelio Dávila,
Hipólito |
106. Hinojosa Silva,
Jesús |
13. Araca Sosa,
José Raúl |
60. Cornelio Figueroa,
Daysi |
107. Hinostroza Toro, Tito |
14. Arcos Díaz,
Cecilia |
61. Coronado Peña,
José Raúl |
108. Huamán Cárdenas, Juan |
15. Arévalo Torres,
Rosa |
62. Cuadros Livelli,
Manuel |
109. Huamán Trinidad, Wilfredo Emilio |
16. Arias Infantes, Guillermo |
63. Cubas Vásquez, Lupo |
110. Huamantumba Vásquez, Mery |
17. Arnez Macedo, Daniel |
64. De la Cruz Paredes, Marcial |
111. Huaraca Vargas, Olimpio |
18. Atauje Montes, Máximo |
65. De la Cruz Paredes, Walter |
112. Huaranga Soto, María |
19. Ayala Palomino, Herlinda |
66. Del Aguila Chamaya, Dully |
113. Hurtado Gutiérrez,
Miguel |
20. Ballarta Rueda, Alfredo |
67. Del Castillo Meza, Victor |
114. Ibánez Ortiz,
Sara |
21. Barba Ureña,
Telmo Jaime |
68. Delgado Gómez, Juan Francisco |
115. Ibarra Nato, Susana |
22. Barbarán Quispe, Jaime |
69. Delgado Suárez, Raquel |
116. Inga Coronado, María |
23. Bautista Apolaya, Max |
70. Dergán Alcántara, Gloria |
117. Infantes Vásquez, María |
24. Begazo Salazar, Zoila Luz |
71. Dextre Cano, Edgar |
118. Jaimes Cano, Marco Antonio |
25. Belleza Cabanillas, Inés |
72. Dextre Ordóñez, Edison |
119. Kitano la Torre, Elsi Judith |
26. Bellido Orihuela, Augusto |
73. Díaz Campos, Flavio |
120. La Cruz Crespo, Carlos |
27. Beltrán Aguilar, Leoncio |
74. Díaz Céspedes, Nina |
121. Loayza Arcos, Lucy |
28. Bereche Riojas, Lidia |
75. Díaz López,
Orlando |
122. Lozano Muñoz, Julio |
29. Bracamonte
Chiringano, Juana |
76. Echevarría Flores, Gumercinda |
123. Luna Aragón,
Elizabeth |
30. Bravo Sarco,
César Augusto |
77. Echevarría Suárez, Ruth Cecilia |
124. Magallan Galoc, Jakeline |
31. Burga Cardozo, Vilma |
78. Elera Molero, Luis |
125. Malpartida Gutierrez, Héctor |
32. Cabanillas Toro, Guadalupe |
79. Erquiñigo Ramón,
Santiago |
126. Marchena Alva,
Jorge |
33. Cabrera Enríquez,
Alfredo |
80. Espinoza Fernández,
Féliz |
127. Margarito
Silva, Manuel |
34. Cajusol Bances, Juan |
81. Eugenio Centeno,
Virginia |
128. Marrugarra
Neyra, Luis |
35. Callirgos Tarazona,
Ricardo |
82. Fernández Sare,
Adolfo |
129. Medina Ramírez,
Sergio Alejandro |
36. Camargo Matensio,
Henry |
83. Ferradas Nuñez,
Pablo Jorge |
130. Meléndez Saavedra,
Inés |
37. Campos Alarcón,
Dana |
84. Flores Guillén,
Lilia Carolina |
131. Menacho Salas,
Aquilino |
38. Cánepa Campos,
Rosa |
85. Flores Salinas,
Javier |
132. Mendoza Michuy,
Manuel |
39. Cárdenas Pinto,
Herver Victor |
86. Gallegos Ramírez, Luz |
133. Molina Ugarte, Noemi |
40. Carranza Rodríguez, Manuel |
87. Galvez Saldaña, Nélida |
134. Montalván Alvarado, César |
41. Carrillo Quiñones, Elizabeth |
88. Ganoza Rivera, Jorge |
135. Montes Pacora, Hugo |
42. Castro Salvatierra, Teodoro |
89. García Huallpa, Ana María |
136. Montes Yacsahuache, Hugo |
43. Ccapali Atoccsa, Irene |
90. García Vergara, Segundo |
137. Montoya Luna, Jaime Jhonny |
44. Ccapali Atoccsa, Zenón |
91. Gimeno Aleman, Cecilia Victoria
|
138. Moreno Gonzáles, Margarita |
45. Chala, Sergio Antonio |
92. Gonzáles Castillo, Ricardo |
139. Mujica Esquivel,
Liz |
46. Changanaqui
Chávez, José |
93. Gonzáles Figueroa, Máximo |
140. Muñoz Jesús, Berilda |
47. Chara Pacheco, Luisa |
94. Gonzáles Guillén, Gustavo |
141. Murillo de Díaz, Rosa Isabel |
142. Navarro Sánchez,
Jorge |
188. Rivera Martinez,
Nelly |
234. Urrunaga Linares,
Victor Manuel |
143. Navarro, Delano
Marcelo |
189. Rodas Romero,
Julio |
235. Valdez Rivera,
Angela |
144. Nizama Zelaya, Víctor |
190. Rodríguez Briones, Johel |
236. Valdez Tellez, Hilda |
145. Núñez Centeno, Victor |
191. Rodriguez Campos, Rommy Cecilia
|
237. Valeriano Sebastián, Bonifacio
Ramón |
146. Núñez Morales, Carmen |
192. Rodríguez Espada, Eugenio |
238. Varias Trabanco, Freddy |
147. Ordoñez Quispe, Marco Antonio |
193. Rodríguez Garcia, Elisa |
239. Vásquez Leguía, Oscar |
148. Ore León,
Jorge |
194. Rodríguez Reaño, Vicente Waldo |
240. Vásquez Quesada, Juan |
149. Orrillo-Vásques Torres, Flavia |
195. Rojas Cortez, Victor |
241. Vásquez Quiñones, Soledad |
150. Ortega Martell, Carlos |
196. Rojas Figueroa, Luis |
242. Vásquez Sánches, Fidel |
151. Owada Amado, Oscar |
197. Rojas Vega, Irma |
243. Vega Díaz, Ivan Alex |
152. Pacheco Munayco, Jorge |
198. Roman Toro, Isaías |
244. Velásquez
Machuca, Edgard |
153. Paitán Mauricio, Catalina |
199. Romero Chang, María |
245. Vereau Palma, Cita |
154. Pajares Godoy, Moises |
200. Saavedra Ambrosio, José |
246. Vera Vitoriño, Elizabeth |
155. Paredes Cubas, Rosa |
201. Saavedra Mego, Violeta |
247. Vidal Vidal, Eva |
156. Paredes Cubas, Walter Roberto |
202. Saavedra Vega, Armando |
248. Villar Contreras, José |
157. Páucar Dávila, Rebeca |
203. Salas Sobrino, Frida |
249. Villareal Rodríguez, Hermelinda |
158. Pedreschi
de Berróspi, Graciela |
204. Salazar Caycho,
Eduardo |
250. Villegas Guerra,
Wilburt |
159. Peredo Cavassa,
Alicia |
205. Salazar Venegas,
María |
251. Vizcarra Zorrilla,
Neyda |
160. Peredo Cavassa,
Mario |
206. Salcedo Olivares,
Liduvina |
252. Zapata Zapata,
Rosario |
161. Pérez Guevara,
César |
207. Sánchez Alarcón,
Reyna |
253. Zapata Espinoza,
Elsa Silvia |
162. Pérez Polo,
Rosalía |
208. Sánchez Campos,
Luz |
254. Zavaleta Saavedra,
Carmen |
163. Pereyra Salazar,
Walter |
209. Sánchez Candia,
Raúl |
255. Zegarra Castro,
David Orlando |
164. Pichilingue
Romero, Teresa |
210. Sánchez Lozano, Juan Carlos |
256. Zegarra Zevallos, Segundo |
165. Pilco Guerra, Luisa |
211. Santibañez Velásquez, Oscar |
257. Zumaeta Flores, Ivan |
166. Pizarro Sanchez, Consuelo |
212. Santisteban, Urmeneta, Ronald |
|
167. Pohll Luna, Amelia Rosario |
213. Sarnaqué Vargas, César |
|
168. Polo Castañeda, Agustín Miguel
Arturo |
214. Silva Baca, Elieberto |
|
169. Purizaca Arámbulo,
José |
215. Silva Baca,
Victor |
|
170. Quineche Díaz, María Elena |
216. Silva Delgado,
Iván |
|
171. Quiñónes
Atalaya, Lira |
217. Sipán Guerra, Javier |
|
172. Quiñónes Díaz,
Manuel |
218. Solís Martell, Clemencia |
|
173. Quiñónes Seminario, Pedro |
219. Solís Retuerto,
Wilder |
|
174. Ramírez Cadenas,
Jacinta |
220. Solís Roca,
Eleuterio |
|
175. Ramírez Granados, Margarita |
221. Soria Cañas, Edith |
|
176. Ramírez Rodríguez, Mónica Emperatriz |
222. Sosa Alvarez, Carmen |
|
177. Ramos de la Cruz, Elmi |
223. Soto Santana, Giovanna Elset |
|
178. Ravello Velásquez, John |
224. Soto Santana, Walter |
|
179. Retuerto Aranda,
Rómulo |
225. Sotomayor Vargas, Rubén Javier |
|
180. Revelo Infante, Ronald Luciano
|
226. Talledo Añazco, Luz Angélica |
|
181. Reyes Caballero, Rubén |
227. Torres Hoyo, Lety |
|
182. Ribotte Rodríguez, Roberto |
228. Torres Martínez, Juan |
|
183. Rigaid Arevalo, Julio Antonio |
229. Torres Prieto,
Rolando Alfonso |
|
184. Rivas Cappelletti, Carlos |
230. Uchuya Chacaltana, Leoncio |
|
185. Rivas Chara, Jorge Martín |
231. Ugarte Pierrend, Juana |
|
186. Rivera Delgado, Bertha |
232. Unzueta Medina, Carlos |
|
187. Rivera Loayza, Carmen |
233. Urquiza Alcántara, Ronald |
|