Guidance of the eruption and development of the primary and permanent
dentitions is an integral part of the care of pediatric patients. Such
guidance should contribute to the development of a permanent dentition
that is in a harmonious, functional and esthetically acceptable occlusion.
But, what diagnostic tools are recommended to assess the developing occlusion?
Is a space maintainer always necessary when a primary tooth is lost prematurely?
If a space maintainer is necessary, what type is recommended for a given
clinical situation? And, what can be done when a tooth is erupting ectopically?
The following module should provide information to help you answer these
questions.
Following completion of the reading assignment and self-instructional module, the student should be able to:
|
II. Diagnosis and Treatment Planning
Dentists who care for child patients have the responsibility to recognize, differentiate, and either appropriately manage or refer abnormalities in the developing dentition as dictated by the complexity of the problem and the individual clinician’s training, knowledge, and experience. Early diagnosis and successful treatment of developing malocclusions can have both short-term and long-term benefits while achieving the goals of occlusal harmony, function and dental facial esthetics.
The variables associated with the treatment of the developing dentition which will affect the degree to which treatment is successful include, but are not limited to:
|
Many unpredictable factors can affect the management of the developing dental arches and minimize the overall success of any treatment. These factors cannot always be controlled by the dentist. Appropriate pretreatment records should include those deemed necessary by the individual clinician to adequately diagnose the patient’s condition.
Clinical examination should include:
|
|
III. Space Maintenance
Whenever primary or permanent teeth are lost prematurely and arch integrity is lost, loss of space and arch length, perimeter, or circumference may result. Migration of primary and/or permanent teeth can occur and the available space may be reduced by an amount sufficient to cause some degree of crowding in the permanent dentition.
Indications:
|
Contraindications:
|
IV. Types of Space Maintainers
The treatment modalities may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following types of appliances.
Fixed appliances:
| Band and Loop / Crown and Loop Distal Shoe Lower Lingual Arch Nance Appliance |
Removable appliances:
| Hawley appliance / Removable dentures |
Band and Loop Space Maintainer
| Indications: Loss of first primary molar Advantages: Ease of fabrication for the clinician and ease of maintenance for the patient Disadvantages: Opposing tooth may supererupt |
Crown and Loop Space Maintainer
| Indications: Loss of first primary molar with significant
loss of tooth substance of the abutment tooth Advantages: Same as above Disadvantages: More difficult to fabricate than band and loop |
Distal Shoe (Intra-alveolar Space Maintainer)
| Indications: Loss of second primary molar prior to eruption
of the first permanent molar Advantages: Maintains the second primary molar space Disadvantages: Difficult to fabricate; contraindicated in some medically compromised patients, ie. pathological heart murmur |
Lower Lingual Holding Arch (LLHA)
| Indications:
Loss of second primary molar in the mandible (counterpart to Nance)
Advantages: Maintains the tooth space and the leeway space Disadvantages: First permanent molars may be susceptible to decalcification; may be prone to breakage unless the patient is well-informed on maintenance |
Nance
| Indications:
Loss of second primary molar in the maxilla-counterpart to LLHA
Advantages: Maintains the tooth space and the leeway space Disadvantages: Meticulous hygiene of the acrylic button is required |
Hawley Appliance / Removable Acrylic
| Indications: When multiple
teeth are lost and the space maintenance and mastication are of
concern Advantages: Can maintain space as well as aid in mastication Disadvantages: Susceptible to fracture or loss |
| Exercise 1: Is a space maintainer always necessary
when a primary molar is lost prematurely?
|
| Exercise 2: Is a space maintainer necessary when
a primary incisor is lost prematurely?
|
| Exercise 3: Why is a Band and Loop (or Crown and
Loop) Space Maintainer not indicated in the premature loss of a
primary second molar?
|
V. Interceptive Orthodontics
Crowding is a characteristic feature of a significant number of all classes of malocclusion. Less than two millimeters of mandibular incisor crowding in the mixed dentition may be considered a normal transitional condition, but crowding generally affects the incisor segment as much as, if not more than, other areas of the arch. Crowding must be considered in the context of the patient’s and parent’s chief complaint and the total dental, skeletal, and soft tissues relationships.
The three most common conditions presented are:
| Ankylosis of Primary Molars (see Anatomy and Anomalies lecture)
Ectopic Eruption of the First Permanent Molar Occlusal Crossbite (anterior or posterior or both) |
|
Treatment utilizes a Modified Halterman Technique:
Anterior
Crossbite in the Permanent Dentition
Treatment should
be rendered as soon as the crossbite is diagnosed.Treatment options include:
Posterior Crossbite in the Primary Dentition
Pseudo Crossbite (functional shift cross-bite, cuspid mediated)Posterior Crossbite in the Permanent Dentition
Diagnosis: Have the cuspids edge-to-edge and then have the patient squeeze the teeth; watch for the deflection.
Treatment: Reduce the buccal of mandibular C’s and the lingual of maxillary C’s. Also consider reduction of the incisal edges of these teeth.True Crossbite:
Treatment: Consider crossbite appliance, depending on patient’s ability to comply with the treatment .
Exercise Answers
Answer 1: If the child is in the complete primary dentition, then yes a space maintainer is necessary to prevent mesial migration of the teeth distal to the one lost. If however, the child is in the transitional dentition, then a space maintainer is not always necessary. If a child loses the primary first molar and has the primary second molar and permanent first molar fully erupted and in occlusion, then a space maintainer may not be indicated.
Answer 2: No, a space maintainer is not necessary in this situation. However, for esthetic reasons a fixed or removable partial denture may be fabricated for the child.
Answer 3: In order for a space maintainer to be effective, it must maintain the available space until the succedaneus tooth erupts. In the situation of the premature loss of a primary second molar, a band and loop would be cemented onto the permanent first molar and would rest against the primary first molar. It is very likely that the primary first molar will exfoliate prior to the eruption of the second premolar. Therefore, the abutment tooth would be lost and the space maintainer would no longer be effective.