Present:
|
Absent:
|
Guests:
|
Ms. Kvanbeck reported that she and Don Cavalier, Chair, have had several conversations about the committee's budget this year; Stephanie Dilworth and George Ogbonna have also been involved in some of the discussions. She distributed two handouts to committee members: 1) the current status of the committee budget; and 2) a history of the committee's allocation from 1992-98. The committee has been allocated a consistent budget of approximately $22,000 per year, and expense transfers from the President's Office were made as supplemental allocations. The report indicated that expenses increased during 1995-97 due to its professional development program. Ms. Kvanbeck said that in the spring of 1997, she asked, at the committee's request, for the following three decision items during the annual budget process:
President Hasselmo declined the request for additional professional development funds and urged the committee to work with VP Carol Carrier in this area. Moreover, the President directed VP Carrier to continue to work with the committee on the employee recognition program, but made no transfer of funding for this item. He approved the increase in the committee's budget by $2,750. In the fall of 1997, Mr. Cavalier made a similar request to President Yudof, and his January 8 letter of response reaffirms President Hasselmo's earlier decisions.
In view of the above information, Ms. Kvanbeck urged the committee to discontinue providing any further professional development awards and to work more closely with VP Carrier in this area. The committee agreed to move in this direction.
Ms. Kvanbeck turned next to the status of the committee's FY98 budget. Because of concerns with the level at which the committee is spending in comparison with its available resources, she asked Mr. Cavalier in February to provide a plan for decreasing the committee's monthly expenses such that it would not end the year with a deficit. The committee's proposal, submitted March 4, indicated that it would not be possible for the committee to continue to operate without supplemental funding for this year and requested a $5,000 supplement.
Ms. Kvanbeck shared with the committee that she had recently been advised that the Senate will be assessed an 8 percent administrative cost reduction for FY99. In view of this and conversations she has had with the President's Office, she said it was unlikely the committee will be provided additional funding for FY99 beyond its current base and that it is possible the current funding level could be reduced depending on further budgetary decisions made this spring. She emphasized the need for the committee to live within its budget and that while supplements have been forthcoming in prior years, that will not be the pattern in the future. To meet the committee's current budget shortfall, she said she will provide a $2,000 supplement and has asked the President's Office to consider a $1,000-$3,000 additional supplement, in the hope that the committee can close FY98 without a deficit.
Questions related to fundraising options were discussed. Ms. Kvanbeck recommended that members review the current University policies regarding this practice before attempting to raise money for the committee. The use of the foundation account was also discussed; in fact, it was noted that all professional development funds were taken out of the University foundation account at one time.
Although the Civil Service Committee and the Academic Staff Advisory Committee have very comparable budgets, they conduct committee business very differently. For example, ASAC has the same number of members and represents a similar number of employees as the CSC, but use most of their budget to fund 5 monetary and professional development awards each year to University employees. Although they continue to meet on a monthly basis, ASAC does not spend their money on operations as does the Civil Service Committee. On the other hand, the Civil Service Committee handles a variety of business items, such as compensation issues, changes to the civil service rules, and legislative concerns, to name a few.
Ms. Kvanbeck said that she would be interested in attending future meetings of the Civil Service Committee upon request, and that any questions about the Senate Office, representation of civil service on senate committees, or the CSC budget can be directed to her or anyone in the Senate Office. The committee agreed to review its spending plans for the remainder of the year to see whether further reductions can be made. In closing, Ms. Kvanbeck thanked the committee for the opportunity to meet with them and said she would let them know if a supplement from the President's Office will be forthcoming.
The FY99 capital needs and rate plan considers the following three options:
Mr. Baker asked committee members for their preference between the three options provided to them in relation to parking rate increases. The Civil Service Committee preferred the second option in order to split the burden of parking rate increases between staff and students.
One committee member asked everyone to remember that the committee historically funded two receptions: 1) one reception for civil service staff who served on committees; and 2) one reception for achievement award winners. Carol Carrier, VP for Human Resources, is aware that Barb Nesheim will be contacting her to discuss options related to professional development.
A motion was passed, seconded, and approved to cancel the April meeting, hold the May meeting with ITV for coordinate campus members to eliminate travel expenses, and hold a final committee meeting in June with President Yudof and new members of the Civil Service Committee.
Wendy Williamson reported that she met twice with the awards committee to discuss the upcoming summer recognition event, approve the new logo'd clothing items for years-of-service gifts, and to improve the overall staff recognition program at the University. She asked committee members if anyone was interested in helping to plan the recognition event, and to review the following ideas and provide comments to her:
The subcommittee also discussed salary principles. A draft of the salary principles was distributed to committee members at the meeting, and any additional feedback regarding the draft should be given to Mary Berg or Linda Smith. After suggested changes are incorporated into the draft, the principles should be ready for distribution to employees for their feedback.
Nancy Lamers also reported vacation payout to the subcommittee. The payout date will be March 25; Anne Beattie from the Payroll Office informed the subcommittee that 750 employees were able to receive the payout and that the average number of hours paid out per employee was 78.
Linda Debeau-Melting attended the 3/11 subcommittee meeting to provide information regarding the proposed four job class changes in the libraries. Library Assistant III (4) and III (10) classes are getting higher salary ranges to address market issues and because the ranges of supervisory classes were not as high as the Library Tech 2 and 3 AFSCME classes they supervise. Library Specialist (5) is being abolished and the people will be promoted to Senior Library Specialists since the qualifications are similar. These class changes will result in a 6% salary increase, retroactive to January 1. Recommended action is that the full committee consider the proposed new four library job classes as being reviewed by the subcommittee.
Kaye Aho also reported that Bob Kvavik is writing a memo in support of the job class system being overhauled. Perhaps this can be used as a model for other administrators. Kaye is optimistic about University employees being in a new system within one year.
The final draft will now be forwarded to President Yudof via Carol Carrier.
The meeting adjourned at 4:15 PM.