| [download Word file]
Perspectives on Institutional Accountability and Public
Engagement
John Ziegenhagen
Director, Institutional Accountability and Evaluation Studies
Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost
(612-626-8711 or ziege006@umn.edu)
1: Roots of Accountability
[the regents shall] make a report annually, to
the Legislatureexhibiting the state and progress of the Universityand
such other information as they may deem proper, or may from time
to time be required of them.
- University charter, 1851 Territorial
Laws, Chapter 3, Section 16
[the board shall] preserve institutional
autonomy, recognizing that the preservation of autonomy requires
accountability, [and shall] monitor and evaluate the performance
of the institution in achieving its goals and mission.
- Board of Regents bylaws, Subd. 1
(f-g)
[the board] holds itself accountable
to the public for accomplishing the mission of the University.Fundamental
planning documents [are] required to come to the Board [including
the] University Plan, Performance, and Accountability Report.
- Board Operations and Agenda Guidelines,
Sections I and II
2: Purposes of University Plan, Performance,
and Accountability Report
1. articulates the mission and vision of the University
2. identifies critical issues and challenges confronting the University
3. sets forth major goals, objectives, and timelines for the ongoing
pursuit of the teaching, research, and outreach functions of the
University
4. publicly demonstrates the Universitys accountability for
progress in reaching its stated goals and objectives
5. links planning, performance evaluation, and resource allocation
at the system and campus/college level
6. illustrates and analyzes longitudinal trends in key areas
7. provides a means for comparisons with peer institutions
8. identifies areas for continued work
9. identifies next steps, major directions, and policy issues
10. proposes adjustments to the Universitys goals and objectives
11. sets the framework for the University budget
3: 2002-2003 University Plan, Performance
and Accountability Report
Executive Summary Engagement: Access and Outreach
Between 1998 and 2001, the University centrally invested
nearly $3 million in research-linked,
engagement-related activities, in addition to a wide range of college
and campus-based activities.
Citizen Satisfaction
In a random telephone survey of Minnesota residents in 2002, the
Universitys average
satisfaction rating was 6.98 out of a possible 10.
Enhancing research and technology capabilities, creating
a sense of state pride, preparing the workforce of the future, and
enhancing the states quality of life were identified as the
most important University contributions to the state.
On-Line Library Holdings and Service
In 2002, there were 550,000 average daily hits on
the main library
Web page.
In 1995, the libraries had few catalogued electronic
journals or full-text electronic resources; by 2002, 16,000 e-journals
and 7,594 full-text electronic resources were part of its collections.
Metro-Area Transfer Students
The total number of metro-area transfers to University
of Minnesota campuses increased by 22 percent between 1996 and 2000,
but declined 7 percent from 2000 to 2002. In 2002, 1,109 students
from the metropolitan area transferred to UMTC, 121 to UMD, 11 to
UMM, and 12 to UMC.
Students Participating in Community Service
The Universitys goal is to involve 4,000 UMTC undergraduates
annually in community service. In 2001-02, over 3,250 undergraduate
students participated in community service or service learning experiences.
Implications for Planning and Initiatives for 2003-2004
Setting Priorities and Measuring Results. Engagement is the
Universitys newest area of development for institutional
and compact-level measures. Over the past several years, priority
has been given to restructuring and focusing the resources, priorities,
and strategies for outreach, including the establishment in 1999
of the Outstanding Community Service Awards and restructuring of
Continuing Education and the Extension Service. In 2001-02, an ad
hoc committee of the Board of Regents addressed expectations and
priorities for outreach activities at the University. In addition,
the provost established an administrative advisory committee on
public engagement and outreach that reviewed and advised on policies,
priorities, resources, models, and accountability for public engagement
and outreach activities. All committees
recommended ongoing central leadership, and a Council on Public
Engagement was appointed in June 2002.
Special Areas of Focus. A public access portal
is under development that will enable users to construct a customized
personal portal with University information of most interest to
them.
An outreach plan will be requested from colleges
as part of their compact.
Measures to evaluate needs, quality, and impact of
University engagement will be improved.
A Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) website and news
channel will be made available to the public and the University
community.
Note: The complete public engagement section of the
report is available at:
www.evpp.umn.edu/uplan/2002/engagement.pdf
4: University Stakeholders
| To Whom Is the University Accountable? |
External
- Board of Regents
- federal, state and local governments
- elected officials
- agencies
- regulators
- funders
- alumni
- donors
- individuals
- corporations
- foundations
- employers
- non-profit and community organizations
- private sector organizations
- other higher education institutions
- higher education associations
- professional communities, associations
- K-12 education
- accrediting organizations
- institutional
- collegiate, departmental/unit
- news media
- individual citizens, parents
|
Internal
- faculty
- students (and their parents)
- staff
- administrators
- volunteers
|
5: Accountability Reporting
| Attributes of Effective Accountability Reporting |
- user friendly easy to find, use, understand, transport,
and reproduce
- user powerful ability to customize and personalize
reports and information
- available any time, any place
- accurate information
- clearly communicated in language that people understand
- professionally presented
- continuously updated
- supports Universitys commitment to transparency
- useful for decision-making
- interactive with external and internal constituencies
- provides specific names and contact methods for more
information
|
|