| [download Word file]
Overall Goal:
The overall goals of this council will be to incorporate public
engagement as a permanent and pervasive priority in teaching,
learning, and research activities throughout the university and
to enlist support for public engagement among all segments of
the university and in the larger community.
Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) Definition
of an Engaged University:
Engagement is the partnership of university knowledge and resources with those of the
public and private sectors to enrich scholarship, research, and creative activity; enhance
curriculum, teaching and learning; prepare educated, engaged citizens; strengthen democratic values
and civic responsibility; address critical societal issues; and contribute to the public good.
A. The Council will be composed of five work groups,
whose members have an interest in relevant issues and who represent
a wide range of perspectives. Each work group will address a particular
theme under the overall charge to the Council. Each work group will
have two co-chairs who will call meetings, address the issues (other
topics may be added) outlined below, and draft committee report
and recommendations for submission to the Council by April 1, 2004.
Progress reports are requested for the December 10, 2003 and February
11, 2004 Council meetings.
B. College Liaisons have been appointed by the Deans and
Chancellors to carry out the following objectives:
- Identify significant examples within each college of measurable
accomplishments within the CIC definition of an engaged university
- Identify undergraduate and graduate students within each college,
who are involved in significant engaged research and community
partnerships, whose work will be recognized through events such
as Impress the President (a roundtable with the president featuring
student presentations of their public scholarship), and the Mary
M. McEvoy Award for Public Engagement and Leadership (from GAPSA.)
- Publicize within each college the annual Outstanding Community
Service Awards and help identify candidates for these awards
- As members of the Assessment Work Group, develop meaningful
measures by which the University can assess and report the public
engagement components of its teaching, learning, and research
opportunities
Liaison activities will be coordinated by Vic Bloomfield,
Vice Provost.
C. The work groups will address the following
topics in accordance
with the overall charge to the council (other topics may be added):
Assessment
Charge statement: develop appropriate and feasible measures of
the University efforts in publicly engaged teaching, learning, and
research, and the impacts and outcomes of those efforts;
- Develop specific short term and long term expected outcomes
of council activities
- Define ways that the University of Minnesota would be different
in five years as a fully engaged university
- Develop measures, which can be tracked over time, of public
engagement as an indicator of institutional performance
Communication
Charge Statement: develop, implement and evaluate the results
of a more robust internal and external communications strategy focused
on themes of publicly engaged research and scholarship, teaching
and learning, and community partnerships;
- Increase accessibility to external and internal groups, organizations
and communities to University resources by using technology through
the University portal and other relevant ways
- Target messages of engaged university activities and programs
to specific audiences
- Develop practical proposals for strengthening mutually beneficial
connections with alumni and other constituents
Innovations
Charge Statement: identify opportunities to develop new programs,
as well as support continuation and/ expansion of existing programs
that are effective in involving students, faculty, alumni, and others
in engaged activities;
- Implications of civic engagement for curriculum, learning experiences
(including service learning and other forms of civic education),
and student life at the undergraduate and graduate levels
- Develop proposals for strengthening civic learning in particular
units
- Identify benefits to students of an engaged university
- Identify benefits to the University of engaged students
- Develop practical proposals for expanding student participation
in engaged activities
- Provide leadership for seed grants selection process
Partnerships
Charge Statement: identify and promote conditions for successful,
interactive, mutually beneficial partnerships as the main basis
for the University's connections to external groups, organizations,
and communities;
- Further develop last year's typology -- and key examples by
getting community feedback
- Work with Vic Bloomfield and the College Liaisons to map important
partnership in colleges and develop strategies (with communications)
for publicity, especially those with strong teaching and research
dimensions
- Strengthen the partnership dimension of President Bruinink's
emerging
initiatives
- Identify and strengthen partnership dimensions of faculty and
curricular development efforts
- Develop strategies for funding partnership efforts that strengthen
teaching and research
Recognition
Charge statement: develop, implement, and evaluate the results
of an integrated strategy for embedding recognition of publicly
engaged work more deeply within institutional processes for incentives,
rewards, and awards;
- Develop practical ways to recognize, encourage and reward varied
forms of engaged activities among students, faculty, staff, administrators
within colleges and other units
- Identify ways to acknowledge and articulate public engagement
as an institutional priority for the University
- Give leadership to the Outstanding Community Service Awards
program
D. Timetable: During the year the Council will
adopt practical recommendations based on reports from the work groups.
Each work group is asked to submit a progress report for the December
10, 2003 meeting and a final brief report by April 1, 2004. These
reports will be reviewed by the entire council to be used for an
annual report to the Executive Vice President and Provost on May
15, 2004.
E. Chair of the Council: The chair will convene,
coordinate, and direct the council and its work groups; coordinate
relations; draft annual report based on the reports and recommendations
from committee with approval by the council; represent the council
publicly and present its recommendations; oversee the monitoring
and assessment of results.
F. Steering Committee: The Steering Committee
will give guidance to the Chair of the Council and is made up of
administration and faculty/staff representatives. The four Vice
Provosts will be an Oversight Committee to the Chair: Vic Bloomfield,
Craig Swan, Al Sullivan, and Billie Wahlstrom.
G. Budget for Council and Work Task Groups: Each
committee is given up to $500 (contact Sue Engelmann,engel026@umn.edu)
for convening expenses. The budget will cover the overall expenses
to operate the council including the website, meeting expenses,
forums, and pilot programs/projects.
COPE Meetings 2003-4
COPE members will convene for three meetings this year to share
the issues of their work groups, and discuss overall issues relevant
to COPE. Most of the work will happen through the
work groups, which may happen face to face or online. The Co-chairs
will take leadership for convening the work groups.
December 10, 2003, 238a Morrill Hall 2:30-4:30
February 11, 2004, 238a Morrill Hall 2:30-4:30
April 14, 2004, 238a Morrill Hall 2:30-4:30
COPE Work Groups for
2003-4:
|
Assessment
Vic Bloomfield*
Sue Engelmann*
John Ziegenhagen
COPE College Liaisons
Communication
Billie Wahlstrom*
John Finnegan*
Carla Carlson
Elaine Eshenbacker
Christina Frazier
David Hamilton
Mary Koppel
Jan Morlock
Matt Sumera
Rosemary Miller
Innovation
Craig Swan*
Gerald Rinehart*
Patricia Crain
Eric Dyer, MSA
Laurel Hirt
Scott Leblanc
Martin Sampson
Susan Stubbefield
GAPSA rep
Partnerships
Harry Boyte*
Sallye McKee*
Mary Boyd
Carl Brandt
Barbara Brandt
Jeff Gorfine
Jan Hively
Cathy Jordan
Nan Kari
Jennifer Keyser
Diana Martenson
Roger McCannon
Barbara Muesing
Jon Plomondon
Tom Scott
Erik Takeshita
Mary Vogel
|
Recognition
Ed Fogelman*
Al Sullivan*
Ron Aminzade
Amos Deinard
John Fossum
Judith Martin, FCC
Joe Massey
Scott McConnell
Selected College Liaisons
Steering Committee
Ed Fogelman* Chair
Vic Bloomfield
Harry Boyte
Sue Engelmann
John Finnegan
Sallye McKee
Gerald Rinehart
Craig Swan
Al Sullivan
Billie Wahlstrom
Ex-Officio
Charles Casey
Margaret Carlson
Frank Cerra
Sandra Gardebring
Mary Nichols
Chancellors/ their representatives
|
The public purposes and responsibilities entailed
in a commitment to civic engagement are the following:
ACCESS TO LEARNING: to assure the highest
quality undergraduate, graduate, and lifelong learning opportunities
to students regardless of age, gender, race, religion, ethnicity,
income, or disability as part of connected learning experiences
that extend from K-12 schooling to collegiate education, professional
training and throughout a lifetime;
ENHANCED DIVERSITY: to promote the inclusion
and participation throughout the university and in the larger community
of people with diverse backgrounds and voices, nourishing a vigorous
pluralism in American society;
CIVIC LEARNING: to develop among all our
students the civic competence and critical thinking that empower
them as effective citizens in their localities, states, nations
and in a global environment, and to develop among people from varied
backgrounds the capacity for responsible leadership in private,
association, and public organizations and institutions
PUBLIC SCHOLARSHIP: to foster new knowledge
and creative expression in the arts, sciences, and humanities as
vital manifestations of an active life of the mind and spirit, and
to encourage faculty research and other professional work concerned
with the conditions and problems of public life that affect the
future of democratic societies and politics at home and around the
world;
SOCIAL WELL-BEING: to contribute through
the discovery, dissemination, and application of knowledge to the
economic and social well-being of communities locally, regionally,
nationally and internationally;
TRUSTED VOICE: to provide citizens and
leaders with dependable knowledge and reliable information for reaching
responsible public judgments and decisions, and so to serve as a
trusted voice in public debates over controversial issues;
PUBLIC SPACES: to provide accessible sites
and intellectual leadership for public deliberation about the meaning
and importance of civic values and civic participation in the face
of increasing globalization, corporatization and civic disengagement;
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: to collaborate with
diverse groups, organizations, institutions, and communities as
mutually helpful partners in furthering shared democratic purposes;
SELF-GOVERNANCE: to maintain the universitys
collegial self-governance and autonomy from special interests as
necessary for the accomplishment of our public purposes;
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY: to remain accountable
for serving well the people of Minnesota by pursuing actively the
full range of the universitys public purposes. |